Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING vs FENEL ANTOINE, 97-005272 (1997)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 97-005272 Visitors: 32
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING
Respondent: FENEL ANTOINE
Judges: J. D. PARRISH
Agency: Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Nov. 07, 1997
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, April 1, 1999.

Latest Update: Jun. 14, 1999
Summary: Whether the Respondent committed the violation alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent's admission of investigation work outside the scope of his employment constitutes violation of law.
97-5272.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION ) OF LICENSING, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 97-5272

)

FENEL ANTOINE, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, a formal hearing was held in this case by video teleconference from Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on February 11, 1999, before J. D. Parrish, a designated Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Steve Bensko, Esquire

Department of State Division of Licensing

The Capitol, Mail Station 4 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250


For Respondent: David C. Rash, Esquire

Law Offices of Johnson & Rash 1509 Northeast Fourth Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


Whether the Respondent committed the violation alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


This case began on October 9, 1997, when the Department of State, Division of Licensing (Department) issued an Administrative Complaint against the Respondent, Fenel Antoine. Such complaint alleged that Respondent had violated Section 493.6118(2), Florida Statutes, by conducting or advertising the business of private investigation without a proper license.

Thereafter, Respondent timely filed an Election of Rights which requested a formal hearing. The matter was forwarded to the Division of Administrative Hearings for formal proceedings on November 7, 1997.

At the hearing, Petitioner presented testimony from Catherine Robinson, an investigator employed by the Division of Licensing; and John Esposito, an investigator with the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, formerly a private investigator. Respondent testified in his own behalf.

Respondent's Exhibit numbered 13 was admitted into evidence. Respondent's Exhibit numbered 14 was proffered for the record but not admitted.

The Transcript of the proceedings was filed with the Division of Administrative Hearings on February 24, 1999. The parties were granted leave until March 24, 1999, to file their proposed recommended orders. Petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order was filed with the Division of Administrative Hearings on March 24, 1999, and Respondent's Proposed Recommended Order was

filed on March 29, 1999. The parties’ orders have been considered in the preparation of this Recommended Order.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. The Petitioner is the state agency charged with the responsibility of regulating persons engaged in the business of private investigation.

  2. At all times material to the allegations of this case, Respondent was licensed as a class "CC" private investigator intern, license number CC97-00449.

  3. Respondent also holds a class "G" statewide firearms license, license number G97-01406.

  4. During some period prior to September 3, 1997, Respondent was employed by J.R. Investigative Agency.

    Mr. Onativia owns and operates J.R. Investigative Agency.


  5. In August 1997, Mr. Onativia filed a complaint with the Department that Respondent was conducting private investigations without a license.

  6. Ms. Robinson, an investigator for the Division of Licensing, was assigned to review the complaint.

  7. Ms. Robinson contacted Respondent and advised him that the agency had received a complaint that he was conducting investigations on his own without an agency license.

  8. Respondent admitted he was doing investigations but claimed Mr. Onativia knew of his activities. He further admitted to Ms. Robinson that he was doing investigations on his own for

    attorneys in order to support his family.


  9. Respondent had also admitted to the investigation activities to John Esposito.

  10. After Ms. Robinson confirmed the information with Mr. Esposito as to the admissions made by Respondent, investigation of the complaint stopped.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  11. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to, and the subject matter of, these proceedings.

  12. Section 493.6118(1)(g), Florida Statutes, provides:


    1. The following constitute grounds for which disciplinary action specified in subsection (2) may be taken by the department against any licensee, agency, or applicant regulated by this chapter, or any unlicensed person engaged in activities regulated under this chapter.

      * * *


      (g) Conducting activities regulated under this chapter without a license or with a revoked or suspended license.


  13. Section 493.6201(1), Florida Statutes, provides:


    1. Any person, firm, company, partnership, or corporation which engages in business as a private investigative agency shall have a Class "A" license. A Class "A" license is valid for only one location.


  14. Section 493.6101, Florida Statutes, provides, in pertinent part:

    1. "Department" means the Department of State.


    2. "Person" means any individual, firm, company, agency, organization, partnership, or corporation.


    3. "Licensee" means any person licensed under this chapter.

      * * *

      (6) "Advertising" means the submission of bids, contracting, or making known by any public notice or solicitation of business, directly or indirectly, that services regulated under this chapter are available for consideration.


      * * *


      1. "Sponsor" means any Class "C," Class "MA," or Class "M" licensee who supervises and maintains under his or her direction and control a Class "CC" intern; or any Class "E" or Class "MR" licensee who supervises and maintains under his or her direction and control a Class "EE" intern.


      2. "Intern" means an individual who studies as a trainee or apprentice under the direction and control of a designated sponsoring licensee.


      * * *


      1. "Private investigative agency" means any person who, for consideration, advertises as providing or is engaged in the business of furnishing private investigations.


      2. "Private investigator" means any individual who, for consideration, advertises as providing or performs private investigation. This does not include an informant who, on a one-time or limited basis, as a result of a unique expertise, ability, vocation, or special access and who, under the direction and control of a Class "C" licensee or a Class "MA" licensee, provides information or services that would otherwise be included in the definition of private investigation.


      3. "Private investigation" means the investigation by a person or persons for the purpose of obtaining information with reference to any of the following matters:


      1. Crime or wrongs done or threatened against the United States or any state or territory of the United States, when

        operating under express written authority of the governmental official responsible for authorizing such investigation.


      2. The identity, habits, conduct, movements, whereabouts, affiliations, associations, transactions, reputation, or character of any society, person, or group of persons.


      3. The credibility of witnesses or other persons.


      4. The whereabouts of missing persons, owners of abandoned property or escheated property, or heirs to estates.


      5. The location or recovery of lost or stolen property.


      6. The causes and origin of, or responsibility for, fires, libels, slanders, losses, accidents, damage, or injuries to real or personal property.


      7. The business of securing evidence to be used before investigating committees or boards of award or arbitration or in the trial of civil or criminal cases and the preparation therefor.


  15. Rule 1C-3.120(1)(c), Florida Administrative Code, provides:

    1. Procedures. Any person who meets the qualifications prescribed by chapter 493, Florida Statutes, and desires a license in the profession or services provided for in the law, shall file with the Division an application using the applications and support forms in Rule 1C-3.100.


      * * *


      (c) Each license issued by the Division shall specify on its face the classification of such license. No licensed agency or individual shall engage in regulated activities reserved for any other

      classification without possessing the appropriate license. No license issued in any of the licensed classifications shall be transferable from the original licensee to any other person. In addition, all licenses will expire at midnight of every second year after date of issuance.


  16. In this case the Department has established that the Respondent conducted investigations without being properly licensed. Respondent admitted the wrongdoing to at least two individuals, Ms. Robinson and Mr. Esposito. Respondent argues that since neither person personally observed Respondent in the performance of such investigative duties, Petitioner has failed in its burden of proof. Such argument is rejected.

  17. Respondent admitted performing investigations for attorneys whose work was not channeled through his former employer. Respondent's after-the-fact attempt to reverse himself and explain the circumstances of such unlicensed work has not been deemed credibly persuasive.

  18. Having considered the testimony of Ms. Robinson and Mr. Esposito controlling in this matter, it is concluded Petitioner has established by clear and convincing evidence the allegations of this case.

RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Department of State, Division of Licensing, enter a Final Order revoking Respondent's class "CC" license.

DONE AND ENTERED this 1st day of April, 1999, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


J. D. PARRISH Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 1st day of April, 1999.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Honorable Katherine Harris, Secretary of State Department of State

The Capitol, Plaza 02 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250


Deborah K. Kearney, General Counsel Department of State

The Capitol, Lower Level 10 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250


Steve Bensko, Esquire Department of State Division of Licensing

The Capitol, Mail Station 4 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250


David C. Rash, Esquire

Law Offices of Johnson and Rash 1509 Northeast Fourth Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will

issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 97-005272
Issue Date Proceedings
Jun. 14, 1999 Notice of Appeal filed. (filed by: David C. Rash )
May 24, 1999 Final Order filed.
Apr. 22, 1999 Respondent`s Exceptions to Recommended Order filed.
Apr. 01, 1999 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 02/11/99.
Mar. 29, 1999 (D. Rash) Proposed Recommended Order (For Judge Signature) filed.
Mar. 24, 1999 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Mar. 05, 1999 Order sent out. (PRO`s due by 3/24/99)
Mar. 05, 1999 Respondent`s Motion for Extension of Time (filed via facsimile).
Mar. 01, 1999 Letter to JDP from D. Rash Re: Transcript filed.
Feb. 24, 1999 Transcript filed.
Feb. 16, 1999 Deposition of Ermelindo M. Onativia, Jr. ; Respondent`s Notice of Filing Exhibit 13 (Admitted Into Evidence) Exhibit 14 (Profered But Not Admitted) filed.
Feb. 11, 1999 Video Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
Feb. 10, 1999 (Respondent) Supplemental Exhibit List rec`d
Feb. 08, 1999 Respondent Antoine`s Witness List rec`d
Feb. 05, 1999 Respoondent`s Notice of Taking Deposition filed.
Feb. 04, 1999 Respondent`s Exhibit List; Exhibits; Respondent`s Responseto Petitioner`s Third Request for Admissions rec`d
Jan. 29, 1999 (Petitioner) Notice of Intent to Use Similar Fact Evidence rec`d
Jan. 29, 1999 Petitioner`s Witness List, Exhibit List and Witness Participation Locations rec`d
Jan. 29, 1999 Order sent out. (motion to quash is granted)
Jan. 26, 1999 Letter to DOS from F. Antoine (RE: motion to quash subpoena); Subpoena for Deposition (filed via facsimile).
Jan. 15, 1999 Respondent`s Notice of Taking Deposition filed.
Dec. 30, 1998 (Petitioner) Notice of Serving Discovery; Petitioner`s Third Request for Admissions filed.
Nov. 16, 1998 Respondent`s Response to Petitioner`s Request for Admissions filed.
Nov. 02, 1998 (Petitioner) Notice of Serving Discovery; Petitioner`s Second Request for Admissions filed.
Oct. 27, 1998 Notice of Hearing by Video sent out. (Video Hearing set for 2/11/99; 9:00am; Ft. Lauderdale & Tallahassee)
Sep. 30, 1998 Joint Response to Order Granting Continuance and Requiring Rescheduling Recommendation filed.
Sep. 16, 1998 Order Granting Continuance sent out. (hearing cancelled; parties to provide suggested hearing information by 9/30/98)
Sep. 15, 1998 Respondent`s Motion for Continuance (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 14, 1998 Order Denying Request for Continuance sent out.
Sep. 14, 1998 (Petitioner) Amended Exhibit List; Exhibit filed.
Sep. 14, 1998 Letter to JDP from Fenel Antoine (RE: request that judge contact witnesses to testify) (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 14, 1998 Petitioner`s Witness List and Witness Participation Locations filed.
Sep. 09, 1998 Letter to Judge Parrish from Fenel Antione (Re: Continuance) (filed via facsimile).
Jun. 25, 1998 Order sent out. (request to relinquish jurisdiction is denied; re: admissions; hearing reset to video hearing for 9/22/98)
Jun. 25, 1998 Notice of Video Hearing sent out. (Video Hearing set for 9/22/98; 9:45am; Ft. Lauderdale & Tallahassee)
Jun. 25, 1998 Notice of Ex Parte Communication sent out. (re: letter filed. at DOAH on 6/15/98)
Jun. 25, 1998 Letter to JDP from Fenel Antoine (RE: objections to harassment by Mr. Bensko) (filed via facsimile).
Jun. 25, 1998 Letter to DOAH from F. Antoine (RE: request for extension) (filed via facsimile).
Jun. 25, 1998 Petitioner`s Response to "Notice of Ex Parte Communication and Order Canceling Hearing" Requiring Submission of Respondent`s Untimely Admissions and Renewed Motion to Deem Admitted Petitioner`s Request for Admissions and to Relinquish Jurisdiction r
Jun. 01, 1998 Letter to JDP from F. Antoine (Re; request that judge not hear any other motions without his presence) filed.
May 29, 1998 Order of Ex Parte Communication and Order Cancelling Hearing sent out. (admissions entered by Respondent to be filed within 10 days)
May 29, 1998 Letter to JDP from F. Antoine (RE: request that judge no hear any other motions without his presence) (filed via facsimile).
May 29, 1998 Petitioner`s Motion to Deem Admitted Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions and Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction and Emergency Motion to Cancel Hearing filed.
May 26, 1998 Letter to JDP from F. Antoine Re: Request for Continuance filed.
May 26, 1998 Letter to JDP from F. Antoine (RE: request for continuance) (filed via facsimile).
May 26, 1998 Letter to Judge Parrish form Fenel Antoine (filed via facsimile).
May 22, 1998 Notice of Ex Parte Communication sent out. (Re: Letter filed. at DOAH on 5/20/98)
Apr. 20, 1998 (Petitioner) Notice of Serving Discovery filed.
Apr. 13, 1998 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed.
Mar. 09, 1998 Notice of Ex Parte Communication and Order Rescheduling Hearing sent out. (3/20/98 hearing cancelled & reset for 6/4/98; 9:00am; Ft. Lauderdale)
Mar. 09, 1998 Order sent out. (motion for substitution of counsel is granted; Respondent to respond to the motion for continuance by 3/3/98)
Feb. 19, 1998 Order sent out. (Respondent`s counsel granted leave to withdraw)
Feb. 17, 1998 (From M. Guy) Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed.
Feb. 17, 1998 (Petitioner) Motion for Continuance filed.
Jan. 26, 1998 Motion to Withdraw filed. (from G. Seligman)
Dec. 15, 1997 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 3/20/98; 9:00am; Ft. Lauderdale)
Dec. 01, 1997 Ltr. to SLS from K. Reid Bronson re: Reply to Initial Order filed.
Nov. 14, 1997 Initial Order issued.
Nov. 14, 1997 Initial Order issued.
Nov. 07, 1997 Agency referral letter; Agency Action, Election of Rignts; Request for Administrative Hearing filed.

Orders for Case No: 97-005272
Issue Date Document Summary
May 14, 1999 Agency Final Order
Apr. 01, 1999 Recommended Order Respondent's admission of investigation work outside the scope of his employment constitutes violation of law.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer