Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

VERNON JACKSON vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, 02-002672 (2002)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 02-002672 Visitors: 12
Petitioner: VERNON JACKSON
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
Judges: DON W. DAVIS
Agency: Department of Children and Family Services
Locations: Quincy, Florida
Filed: Jul. 05, 2002
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, October 17, 2002.

Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2003
Summary: The issue is whether Petitioner should be granted an exemption from disqualification for working in a position of trust with disabled adults and children pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 435, Florida Statutes.Employee background screening is not applicable to employee for misdemeanor committed by him prior to effective date of screening statute. Employee should be granted an exemption from disqualification.
02-2672.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


VERNON JACKSON,


Petitioner,


vs.


DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,


Respondent.

)

)

)

)

) Case No. 02-2672

)

)

)

)

)

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Administrative Law Judge Don W. Davis conducted a formal hearing in the above-styled case on September 18, 2002, in Quincy, Florida. The following appearances were entered:

For Petitioner: Ben R. Patterson, Esquire

315 Beard Street Post Office Box 4289

Tallahassee, Florida 32315-4289


For Respondent: John R. Perry, Esquire

Department of Children and Family Services

2639 North Monroe Street Building A, Room 104 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2949


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


The issue is whether Petitioner should be granted an exemption from disqualification for working in a position of trust with disabled adults and children pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 435, Florida Statutes.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


By letter dated May 30, 2002, Respondent advised Petitioner that Petitioner's request for exemption had been denied.

Petitioner timely requested formal administrative proceedings with regard to Respondent's exemption denial and the matter was transferred to the Division of Administrative Hearings.

At the final hearing, Petitioner testified in his own behalf and presented the testimony of three other witnesses. Respondent presented testimony of two witnesses and four exhibits.

No transcript was provided. The parties submitted Proposed Recommended Orders which have been reviewed in the course of preparation of this Recommended Order.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Since 1979, Petitioner, Vernon Jackson (Petitioner), has been employed by the Department of Children and Family Services (Respondent) or its predecessor government agency, with the exception of a period in 1996-97. He is presently classified as a psychiatric aide.

  2. Petitioner worked in a unit of the Florida State Hospital in Chattahoochee, Florida, which provides care to the patients of the facility, and he is a caregiver. It is in that capacity that he is subject to the employment screening requirements of Chapter 435 of the Florida Statutes.

  3. On August 23, 1980, Petitioner's girlfriend, Willie Thomas, got into an argument with a 17-year-old girl named Gwendolyn Arnold. When the argument between Thomas and Arnold escalated into a physical fight, Petitioner became involved in the fray. Arnold's 15-year-old brother also joined in the activity. As a result of the incident, Petitioner was charged with the misdemeanor offenses of disorderly conduct, resisting arrest without violence, and battery.

  4. Petitioner pled guilty to all three of the charged offenses. Adjudication of guilt was withheld by the court. Petitioner paid a fine of $50, plus costs, for the first two counts, disorderly conduct and resisting arrest without violence, and a fine of $100, plus costs, for the battery charge. In conjunction with the battery charge he was placed on probation for a period of one year.

  5. Petitioner's next criminal episode also involved Willie Thomas, his earlier girlfriend. On April 16, 1981, Petitioner was arrested and pled guilty to trespassing at Thomas’ home. He was required to pay a fine of $50. Although, adjudication was again withheld, he was placed on probation to run concurrently with his earlier probation sentence.

  6. Some months later, on November 19, 1981, Petitioner pled guilty to disorderly conduct involving a public brawl with

    two men. He paid a fine of $75 and adjudication of guilt was withheld.

  7. Employment screening at the Florida State Hospital was commenced in 1997 for positions of employment similar to that held by Petitioner. Petitioner's 1980 offense and 1981 plea was overlooked until this year. On or about April 20, 2002, after discovery of the battery offense, a decision was made to remove him from a caregiver position pending resolution of his request for an exemption.

  8. With a birth date of January 21, 1960, Petitioner was


    20 years of age at the time of his first offense and 21 years of age when he last committed a criminal offense.

  9. Several supervisors of Petitioner testified that he was at all times a caring and diligent worker. Those supervisors included Karen Alford (“He was good.”); Freddie Culver (described Mr. Jackson as showing a lot of care and kindness); and Helen Conrad (“Excellent”).

  10. The parties stipulated that Julia Thomas and Barry Moore would testify to similar conclusion and opinions as to the quality of Petitioner's employment. Petitioner’s performance appraisals were at least satisfactory.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  11. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to and subject matter of the above styled cause. Section 120.57(1) Florida Statutes.

  12. Respondent disqualified Petitioner for an offense that occurred before October 1, 1995. The provisions of Chapter

    95-228 of the Laws of Florida that created Chapter 435 of the Florida Statutes provided that employment screening provisions of the statute did not become effective until October 1, 1995, and did not apply to offenses committed before that date.1 It is also axiomatic that a preexisting interest may be not be taken by legislation passed subsequent to the creation of that interest. For those reasons Mr. Jackson should not be disqualified in 2002 for offenses to which he pled in 1980.

    See Florida Public Employees Council 79, AFSCME v. Department of Children and Family Services, 794 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Guest v. Department of Juvenile Justice, 786 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

  13. In the Guest decision, the court considered the appeal of Mr. Guest concerning a claim that Chapter 435, Florida Statutes, was unconstitutional. The court upheld the decision of the circuit court that required Mr. Guest to exhaust his administrative remedies. As to Guest’s claim that the statute was facially unconstitutional, the court said:


    Id.

    As to the facial constitutional challenge, we conclude that the appellant does not have standing. Florida Law Chapter 95-228 created Chapter 435, Florida Statutes, on employment screening. In section 64 of the act, the legislature stated that “this act shall take effect October 1, 1995, and shall apply to offenses committed on or after that date.”

    Ch. 95-228, Sec. 64, at 2076, Laws of Fla. In as much as the appellant allegedly committed his offenses in 1985, the appellant does not have standing to raise any facial constitutionality issues concerning Chapter 435. Thus, we affirm the appealed order without reaching the merits of the facial constitutionality challenge. See, Singletary v. State, 322 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1975).


  14. Even if Petitioner were subject to disqualification


from his employment on the basis of his prior offenses committed in 1980-81, he should be granted an exemption. The first offense occurred in 1980 when he was but 20 years of age. There were no serious injuries, and Petitioner has had no criminal problems since 1981. His employment history shows that he is a dependable, conscientious, and diligent employee.

RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is

RECOMMENDED that a final order be entered granting Petitioner an exemption from disqualification.

DONE AND ENTERED this 17th day of October, 2002, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


DON W. DAVIS

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 17th day of October, 2002.


ENDNOTE


1/ Section 64 of Chapter 95-228 provides, "Except as otherwise provided herein, this act shall take effect October 1, 1995, and shall apply to offenses committed on or after that date."


COPIES FURNISHED:


Ben R. Patterson, Esquire Patterson and Traynham

315 Beard Street Post Office Box 4289

Tallahassee, Florida 32315-4289


John R. Perry, Esquire Department of Children and

Family Services

2639 North Monroe Street Building A, Suite 104 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2949

Paul F. Flounlacker, Jr., Agency Clerk Department of Children and

Family Services

1317 Winewood Boulevard Building 2, Room 204B Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700


Josie Tomayo, General Counsel Department of Children and

Family Services

1317 Winewood Boulevard

Building 2, Room 204

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 02-002672
Issue Date Proceedings
Jan. 30, 2003 Final Order filed.
Oct. 17, 2002 Recommended Order issued (hearing held September 18, 2002) CASE CLOSED.
Oct. 17, 2002 Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
Sep. 30, 2002 Petitioner`s Post-Hearing Memorandum; Proposed Findings of Fact filed.
Sep. 30, 2002 Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Sep. 18, 2002 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
Sep. 17, 2002 (Joint) Prehearing Statement (filed via facsimile).
Jul. 23, 2002 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
Jul. 23, 2002 Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for September 18, 2002; 10:00 a.m.; Quincy, FL).
Jul. 18, 2002 Response to Initial Order filed Respondent.
Jul. 09, 2002 Initial Order issued.
Jul. 05, 2002 Denial of Request for Exemption filed.
Jul. 05, 2002 Petition for Exemption; Demand for Section 120.57(1), F.S., Hearing filed.
Jul. 05, 2002 Notice filed.

Orders for Case No: 02-002672
Issue Date Document Summary
Jan. 28, 2003 Agency Final Order
Oct. 17, 2002 Recommended Order Employee background screening is not applicable to employee for misdemeanor committed by him prior to effective date of screening statute. Employee should be granted an exemption from disqualification.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer