Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: AVANTE AT LEESBURG, INC., D/B/A AVANTE AT LEESBURG
Judges: BARBARA J. STAROS
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Leesburg, Florida
Filed: Aug. 19, 2002
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, December 13, 2002.
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2003
Summary: Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaints and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Agency did not meet its burden of proof in that it did not prove that a Class III deficiency was not corrected within the time frame established by the agency. Recommend dismissal of Administrative Complaint.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION!”
Certified Artie W Wimbe:
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ADMINISTRATION,
SENDERS RECORD
Petitioner,
vs. AHCA NO. 2002040251
AVANTE AT LEESBURG, INC., D/B/A
AVANTE AT LEESBURG,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
(“AHCA”), by and through its undersigned counsel, and files
this Administrative Complaint against AVANTE AT LEESBURG,
INC., D/B/A AVANTE AT LEESBURG (“Respondent”), pursuant to
Section 120.569, and 120.57, Florida Statutes (2001), and
alleges:
Nature of the Action
1. This is an action to impose an administrative
fine upon Respondent pursuant to Section 400.419, Florida
Statutes.
Jurisdiction And Venue
2. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Sections
120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes.
3. AHCA has jurisdiction over Respondent pursuant to
Chapter 400 Part III, Florida Statutes.
4. Venue vests pursuant to Rule 28-106.207, Florida
Administrative Code.
vr” ~~
PARTIES
5. AHCA is the regulatory agency responsible for
licensure of nursing homes and enforcement of all
applicable Florida laws and rules governing skilled nursing
facilities pursuant to the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of
1987, Title Iv, Subtitle C (as amended) ; Chapter 400, Part
II, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 59A-4, Florida
Administrative Code, respectively.
6. Respondent is a skilled nursing facility in the
State of Florida, whose 116-bed nursing home is located at
2000 Edgewood Avenue, Leesburg, Florida 34748. Respondent
is and was at all times material hereto licensed as a
skilled nursing facility license number SNF1026096;
certificate number 8730, effective May 13, 2002 through May
31, 2002. Respondent was subsequently issued skilled
nursing facility license number SNF 1026096; certificate
number 8746, effective June 1, 2002 through May 31, 2003.
7. Respondent was at all times material hereto, a
licensed facility under the licensing authority of AHCA,
and was required to comply with all applicable regulations,
statutes and rules.
COUNT I
oe
RESPONDENT FAILED TO MEET PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS OF QUALITY
BY ITS FAILURE TO PROPERLY FOLLOW PHYSICIAN ORDERS.
42 CFR $483.20 (k) (3) (i) (2001) ;
Rule 59A-4.1288, Fla. Admin. Code (2001.
8. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates by reference
Paragraphs one (1) through seven (7) above as if fully set
forth herein.
9. On or about March 28, 2002, AHCA conducted a
Survey at Respondent’s facility. A class III deficiency
was cited against Respondent based on the findings below:
2
—" ant
Based on record review and staff interviews the facility did not follow physician
orders on 1 of 5 residents.
Findings:
Review of the medical record revealed that an order for "Serum albumin now and
yearly” was written as part of the admission orders on 3/11/02. Review of the
medical record did not reveal that a serum albumin was performed as ordered.
Interview with the administrator on 3/28/02 at 1:40 PM revealed that the serum
albumin was not performed.
10. The facility was given a mandated correction date
of April 28, 2002,
Tl. On or about May 13, 2002, AHCA conducted a
follow-up survey at Respondent’s facility. A class IIT
deficiency was cited against Respondent based on the
findings below:
Based on record review and staff interviews the facility did not follow physician
orders on 1 of 21 residents (Resident #1). Failure to follow physician orders could
result in the resident in not receiving the attended therapeutic benefit,
Findings:
Interview with the director of nursing on 5/14/02 at 4:35 PM revealed that the
order was missed and not followed.
12. Based on all of the foregoing, Respondent
violated 42 CFR § 483.20 (k) (3) (i) via Rule S9A-4.1288,
Florida Administrative Code, by failing to meet
professional Standards of quality, by failing to properly
follow and implement physician orders.
13. Pursuant to Section 400.23 (8) (c) , Florida
Statutes, the foregoing is a class IIt deficiency because
the agency determines it will result in no more than
minimal physical, mental, or psychosocial discomfort to the
resident or has the potential to compromise the resident’s
ability to maintain or reach his or her highest practical
physical, mental, or psychosocial well-being, as defined by
an accurate and comprehensive resident assessment, plan of
care, and provision of services. A class IIt deficiency is
subject to a civil penalty of $1,000 for an isolated
deficiency, $2,000 for a patterned deficiency, and $3,000
for a widespread deficiency. The fine amount shall be
doubled for each deficiency if the facility was previously
cited for one or more class I or class If deficiencies
during the last annual inspection or any inspection or
complaint investigation since the last annual inspection.
A citation for a class III deficiency must specify the time
within which the deficiency is required to be corrected.
If a class III deficiency is corrected within the time
specified, no civil penalty shall be imposed. AHCA is
authorized to impose a fine against Respondent in the
amount of $1,000.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA respectfully requests the following
relief;
a) Make factual and legal findings in favor of AHCA.
b) Impose a fine in the amount of $1,000.00.
c) Any other general and equitable relief as deemed
appropriate.
Dated: July 12, 2002
Agency for Health Care Administration
’
Jodi/C. Page, Es e,
Senior Attorney
NOTICE
Respondent, AVANTE AT LEESBURG, INC., D/B/A AVANTE AT
LEESBURG hereby is notified that Respondent has a right to
request an administrative hearing pursuant to Sections
120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes (2001). Specific
options for administrative action are set out in the
attached Election of Rights form and explained in the
attached Explanation of Rights form. All requests for a
hearing shall be sent to AHCA, Jodi c, Page, Esquire,
Senior Attorney, Agency for Health Care Administration,
2727 Mahan Drive, Building 3, Mail Stop #3, Tallahassee,
Florida, 32308.
RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT THE FAILURE TO REQUEST
A HEARING WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS oF RECEIPT OF THIS
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT WILL RESULT IN AN ADMISSION OF THE
FACTS ALLEGED IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT AND THE ENTRY
OF A FINAL ORDER BY AHCA.
Dated: July 12, 2002
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
a
Jo . Page, E e,
Senior Attorney
Fla. Bar. No. 0174629
2727 Mahan Drive, MS#3
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(850) 921-6362 (office)
(850) 921-0158 (fax)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
ee ERI CE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the
Administrative Complaint has been sent Certified mail (#
7106 4575 1294 2049 8842) to Avante at Leesburg, 2000
Edgewood Avenue, Leesburg, Florida 34748; this 19% day of
2002.
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
1
Seer
Jodi . Page, E ,
Senior Attorney
Fla. Bar. No. 0174629
2727 Mahan Drive, MS#3
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(850) 921-6362 (office)
(850) 921-0158 (fax)
Docket for Case No: 02-003254
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Apr. 18, 2003 |
Final Order filed.
|
Dec. 13, 2002 |
Recommended Order issued (hearing held October 23, 2002) CASE CLOSED.
|
Dec. 13, 2002 |
Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
|
Nov. 19, 2002 |
Agency`s Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Nov. 19, 2002 |
Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
|
Nov. 04, 2002 |
Transcript of Proceedings filed. |
Oct. 30, 2002 |
Letter to Judge Staros from J. Page enclosing additional page to Petitioner`s exhibit no. 6 filed.
|
Oct. 23, 2002 |
CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames. |
Oct. 16, 2002 |
Joint Prehearing Stipulation (filed via facsimile).
|
Oct. 16, 2002 |
Petitioner`s Response to Pre-Hearing Instructions (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 18, 2002 |
Petitioner`s First Set of Requests for Admission, Interrogatories, and Request for Production of Documents (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 09, 2002 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Sep. 09, 2002 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for October 23 and 24, 2002; 10:00 a.m.; Leesburg, FL).
|
Sep. 09, 2002 |
Order of Consolidation issued. (consolidated cases are: 02-003254, 02-003255)
|
Aug. 28, 2002 |
Joint Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Aug. 28, 2002 |
Motion to Consolidate (case requested to be consolidated 02-3254, 02-3255) (filed by Respondent via facsimile)
|
Aug. 21, 2002 |
Initial Order issued.
|
Aug. 19, 2002 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Aug. 19, 2002 |
Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Aug. 19, 2002 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|
Orders for Case No: 02-003254
Issue Date |
Document |
Summary |
Apr. 09, 2003 |
Agency Final Order
|
|
Dec. 13, 2002 |
Recommended Order
|
Agency did not meet its burden of proof in that it did not prove that a Class III deficiency was not corrected within the time frame established by the agency. Recommend dismissal of Administrative Complaint.
|