Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BOBBY WILLIAMS, D/B/A BOBBY WILLIAMS FARMS vs DAL DON PRODUCE, INC.; AND FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, 04-002881 (2004)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 04-002881 Visitors: 14
Petitioner: BOBBY WILLIAMS, D/B/A BOBBY WILLIAMS FARMS
Respondent: DAL DON PRODUCE, INC.; AND FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND
Judges: DANIEL MANRY
Agency: Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Locations: Sebring, Florida
Filed: Aug. 17, 2004
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, November 3, 2004.

Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2004
Summary: The issue for determination in this proceeding is whether Respondent, Dal Don Produce, Inc. (Dal Don), owes Petitioner $5,956 for watermelons for the reasons stated in the Producer Complaint filed with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (Department) on December 26, 2003.Petitioner showed that Respondent failed to pay $5,956.60 for watermelons Petitioner delivered to Respondent and that responsibility for payment evolves to the issues of one bond.
04-2881

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


BOBBY WILLIAMS, d/b/a BOBBY ) WILLIAMS FARMS, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

DAL DON PRODUCE, INC. AND ) FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF ) MARYLAND, )

)

Respondents. )


Case No. 04-2881

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Administrative Law Judge Daniel Manry conducted the administrative hearing of this case on October 1, 2004, in Sebring, Florida, on behalf of the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH).

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Bobby Williams, pro se

Bobby Williams Farms 5005 Placid View Drive

Lake Placid, Florida 33582 For Dal Don Produce, Inc.:

(No Appearance)


For Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland:


(No Appearance)

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


The issue for determination in this proceeding is whether Respondent, Dal Don Produce, Inc. (Dal Don), owes Petitioner

$5,956 for watermelons for the reasons stated in the Producer Complaint filed with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (Department) on December 26, 2003.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


On December 26, 2003, Petitioner filed a Producer Complaint with the Department pursuant to Section 601.66, Florida Statutes (2003). By letter dated August 16, 2004, the Department referred the matter to DOAH to conduct an administrative hearing. Neither of the Respondents in this case appeared at the administrative hearing.

At the hearing, Petitioner presented the testimony of two witnesses and submitted three exhibits for admission into evidence. The identity of the witnesses and exhibits and any attendant rulings, are set forth in the official record of this proceeding. Petitioner did not request a transcript of the administrative hearing and did not file a proposed recommended order.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Pursuant to an agreement between Petitioner and Dal Don, Petitioner delivered seven loads of watermelons to Dal Don

    between November 11 and 24, 2003. The watermelons weighed


    approximately 291,016 pounds.


  2. Dal Don agreed to pay Petitioner $21,956.60 for the watermelons. Dal Don paid Petitioner only $16,000. Dal Don owes Petitioner $5,956.60. Dal Don did not provide Petitioner with an accounting or explanation for the unpaid amount.

  3. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland (Fidelity) is the surety for Dal Don and provided bond for Dal Don pursuant to Surety Bond Number 08374953 (the bond). The conditions and provisions of the bond are to assure proper accounting and payment to producers, including Petitioner. In the absence of payment from Dal Don, responsibility for payment evolves to Fidelity.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  4. DOAH has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this proceeding pursuant to Subsection 120.57(1), Florida Statutes (2004). DOAH provided the parties with adequate notice of the administrative hearing. Neither Dal Don nor Fidelity appeared at the hearing or otherwise submitted any evidence.

  5. The burden of proof is on Petitioner. Florida Department of Transportation v. J.W.C. Company, Inc., 396 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Petitioner must show by a preponderance

    of the evidence that he is entitled to the remedy claimed in the Producer Complaint.

  6. Petitioner satisfied his burden of proof. Dal Don is licensed as a dealer in agricultural products. Dal Don failed to make proper payment and account for watermelons that Petitioner delivered to Dal Don. §§ 601.03, 601.64, 601.65, and 601.69, Fla. Stat. (2003).

  7. Sections 601.65 and 601.69, Florida Statutes (2003), require Dal Don to account for all of the watermelons that Petitioner delivered to Dal Don. Dal Don has breached its statutory duty to account for the watermelons it received from Petitioner.

RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is

RECOMMENDED that the Department enter a final order adopting the findings and conclusions in this Recommended Order and requiring Respondents to pay Petitioner the sum of

$5,956.60.

DONE AND ENTERED this 3rd day of November, 2004, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

DANIEL MANRY

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 3rd day of November, 2004.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Brenda D. Hyatt, Bureau Chief Department of Agriculture and

Consumer Services Bureau of License and Bond

407 South Calhoun Street, Mayo Building Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0800


Bobby Williams

Bobby Williams Farms 5005 Placid View Drive

Lake Placid, Florida 33582


C. Catherine Bloebaum Dal Don Produce, Inc. Post Office Box 120036

Clermont, Florida 34712-0036


Kathy Alves

Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland Post Office Box 87

Baltimore, Maryland 21203

Honorable Charles H. Bronson Commissioner of Agriculture Department of Agriculture and

Consumer Services

The Capitol, Plaza Level 10 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0810


Richard D. Tritschler, General Counsel Department of Agriculture and

Consumer Services

The Capitol, Plaza Level 10 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0810


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 04-002881
Issue Date Proceedings
Dec. 09, 2004 Final Order filed.
Nov. 03, 2004 Recommended Order (hearing held October 1, 2004). CASE CLOSED.
Nov. 03, 2004 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Oct. 01, 2004 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Sep. 10, 2004 Letter to G. Schultz from B. Hyatt confirming services of a court reporter filed.
Aug. 31, 2004 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Aug. 31, 2004 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for October 1, 2004; 9:30 a.m.; Sebring, FL).
Aug. 17, 2004 Verified Return of Service filed.
Aug. 17, 2004 Letter to Ms. Kelley from B. Hyatt regarding enclosed Notice filed.
Aug. 17, 2004 Initial Order.
Aug. 17, 2004 Letter to Ms. Hyatt from K. Alves regarding pending claims filed.
Aug. 17, 2004 Order filed.
Aug. 17, 2004 Response to Complaint filed.
Aug. 17, 2004 Request for Administrative Hearing filed.
Aug. 17, 2004 Producer Complaint filed.
Aug. 17, 2004 Notice of Filing a Complaint filed.
Aug. 17, 2004 Agency referral filed.

Orders for Case No: 04-002881
Issue Date Document Summary
Dec. 07, 2004 Agency Final Order
Nov. 03, 2004 Recommended Order Petitioner showed that Respondent failed to pay $5,956.60 for watermelons Petitioner delivered to Respondent and that responsibility for payment evolves to the issues of one bond.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer