Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JENNIFER N. SULLIVAN vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 06-002402 (2006)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 06-002402 Visitors: 5
Petitioner: JENNIFER N. SULLIVAN
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Judges: R. BRUCE MCKIBBEN
Agency: Department of Corrections
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Jul. 10, 2006
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, October 9, 2006.

Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2006
Summary: The issues in this case are whether Petitioner was overpaid certain wages by the Respondent, and, if so, whether repayment is warranted.Petitioner is to repay overpayments to Respondent.
06-2402.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


JENNIFER N. SULLIVAN,


Petitioner,


vs.


DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,


Respondent.

)

)

)

)

) Case No. 06-2402

)

)

)

)

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, a final hearing was held on September 8, 2006, by video teleconference between sites in Tampa and Tallahassee, Florida, before R. Bruce McKibben, Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: No appearance


For Respondent: Matthew M. Deleo, Esquire

Department of Corrections 2601 Blair Stone Road

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2500 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES

The issues in this case are whether Petitioner was overpaid certain wages by the Respondent, and, if so, whether repayment is warranted.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


By means of a letter dated June 26, 2006, Respondent Department of Corrections (Department) notified Petitioner that an audit of her attendance, leave, and pay records revealed an overpayment of $111.13 and requested immediate repayment.

Petitioner responded, challenging the total amount of the overpayment and asking the Department's basis for seeking repayment. Petitioner requested a formal administrative hearing, which was duly noticed and scheduled for video teleconferencing at sites in Tallahassee and Tampa.

At the final hearing held on September 8, 2006, Petitioner did not appear. The Department presented the testimony of one witness, Angie Cynkar, a human resource analyst with the Department. The Department also offered 12 exhibits, all of which were received in evidence.

No transcript of the final hearing was ordered, and the parties did not request an opportunity to submit proposed recommended orders.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Petitioner was an employee of the Department until December 13, 2005. She was employed as a corrections officer and, as such, was eligible for criminal justice incentive pay.

  2. Criminal justice incentive pay is paid separately and apart from regular salary payments through a separate payment

    system used by the Department. A person whose employment with the Department is terminated would not be terminated automatically from the incentive pay payment system.

  3. Upon her termination from employment with the Department, Petitioner continued to receive incentive pay by direct deposit to her bank account. This occurred on five occasions following her termination. The total amount of the overpayments to Petitioner after taxes was $111.13.

  4. The Department asked Petitioner to return the money that had been overpaid, but Petitioner did not comply with the request. In her request for a formal hearing, Petitioner alleged some error in the amount of overpayments being claimed, but no evidence was presented to support that allegation at the final hearing.

  5. The Department presented evidence as to each of the incentive pay payments to Petitioner following her termination from employment. Respondent averred that all taxes withheld from the incentive payments would be credited to Petitioner upon return of the overpayment amount.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  6. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to and the subject matter of this proceeding pursuant to Section 120.569 and Subsection 120.57(1), Florida Statutes (2006).

  7. The Department is authorized by Florida Administrative Code Rule 69I-22.003(7) to seek return of any improper payments made to state employees by direct deposit through an electronic funds transfer.

  8. Further, Florida Administrative Code Rule 69I-21.004 sets forth the process for recovery of non-salary sums due the State from employees. The Department has satisfied the recovery process in this matter.

  9. The Department met its burden of proof that overpayments had been made to Petitioner and that repayment was

due and owing.


RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is

RECOMMENDED that a final order be entered by the Department of Corrections requiring repayment of the incentive payments made to Petitioner in the sum of $111.13.

DONE AND ENTERED this 9th day of October, 2006, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

R. BRUCE MCKIBBEN Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 9th day of October, 2006.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Jennifer Sullivan 38618 Kapok Avenue

Zephyrhills, Florida 33542


Matthew M. Deleo, Esquire Department of Corrections 2601 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399


James R. McDonough, Secretary Department of Corrections 2601 Blair Stone Road

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2500


Rosa Carson, General Counsel Department of Corrections 2601 Blair Stone Road

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-6563

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 06-002402
Issue Date Proceedings
Nov. 01, 2006 Final Order filed.
Oct. 09, 2006 Recommended Order (hearing held September 8, 2006). CASE CLOSED.
Oct. 09, 2006 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Sep. 08, 2006 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Sep. 01, 2006 Witness List of Respondent; Respondent Exhibit List and Proposed Hearing Exhibits filed (hearing exhibits not available for viewing).
Aug. 21, 2006 Notice of Appearance (filed by M. Deleo).
Jul. 28, 2006 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for September 8, 2006; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa and Tallahassee, FL).
Jul. 28, 2006 Department of Corrections` Response to Initial Order filed.
Jul. 24, 2006 In Response to the Initial Order filed.
Jul. 10, 2006 Notice of Overpayments filed.
Jul. 10, 2006 Request for Administrative Hearing filed.
Jul. 10, 2006 Agency referral filed.
Jul. 10, 2006 Initial Order.

Orders for Case No: 06-002402
Issue Date Document Summary
Nov. 01, 2006 Agency Final Order
Oct. 09, 2006 Recommended Order Petitioner is to repay overpayments to Respondent.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer