Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JIMMY O. GATHERS vs DEL-JIN, 07-004827 (2007)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 07-004827 Visitors: 27
Petitioner: JIMMY O. GATHERS
Respondent: DEL-JIN
Judges: P. MICHAEL RUFF
Agency: Florida Commission on Human Relations
Locations: Panama City, Florida
Filed: Oct. 23, 2007
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, March 5, 2008.

Latest Update: May 15, 2008
Summary: The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Petitioner, because of his race, was given different terms and conditions of employment by being denied training, being unfairly disciplined, retaliated against, terminated, and, if those allegations are proven, what remedy is warranted.The Petitioner had the burden of proof on discrimination claims and failed to appear at hearing. No explanation of default was made by Petitioner. The case is dismissed.
07-4827.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


JIMMY O. GATHERS,


Petitioner,


vs.


DEL-JIN,


Respondent.

)

)

)

)

) Case No. 07-4827

)

)

)

)

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL


Pursuant to notice this cause came on for formal proceeding and hearing before P. Michael Ruff, a duly-designated Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings in Panama City, Florida, on January 22, 2008. The appearances were as follows:

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: No appearance


For Respondent: M. Kristen Allman, Esquire

Oagletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

100 North Tampa Street, Suite 3600 Tampa, Florida 33062


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE:


The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Petitioner, because of his race, was given different terms and conditions of employment by being denied training,

being unfairly disciplined, retaliated against, terminated, and, if those allegations are proven, what remedy is warranted.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


This cause arose upon the filing of a Charge of Discrimination on February 1, 2007, by the above-named Petitioner. After investigation the Florida Commission on Human Relations (Commission) made a Determination of "No Cause," after which the Petitioner exercised his right to file a Petition for Relief and to have the matter referred for formal proceeding to the Division of Administrative Hearings. The referral was made and the proceeding was ultimately assigned to the undersigned Administrative Law Judge.

The cause came on for hearing as noticed. The Petitioner failed to appear at the hearing, and no evidence was adduced in proof of the Petitioner's claims. The Petitioner bears the burden of proof and, therefore, inasmuch as no evidence was presented for the Petitioner, it was unnecessary for the Respondent to go forward with its case and evidence. After giving an ample opportunity for the Petitioner to appear and prosecute his claim, the hearing was adjourned.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. The Petitioner, Jimmy O. Gathers, filed a Petition for Relief asserting that he was wrongfully terminated from his position with the Respondent employer and, before termination,

    was subjected to inadequate and improper training, inadequate work materials, was unfairly disciplined, and was ultimately retaliated against and terminated, all because of his race (African-American). The cause was set for hearing on the Petition for Relief for January 22, 2008, at the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims, hearing room two, 2401 State Avenue, Suite 100, Panama City, Florida, at 10:00 a.m. Central Time. The Notice of Hearing was sent to the Petitioner's last known address of record at 621 Maine Avenue, Panama City, Florida 32401, notifying the Petitioner of the hearing on the above date, time, and place. There was no communication from the Petitioner by motion, letter, telephonically, or otherwise indicating that the Petitioner had any difficulty which might prevent his attending the hearing at the noticed date, time, and place.

  2. Upon convening the hearing, the Petition failed to appear. A substantial period of time was allowed to elapse, nearly one hour, in which the undersigned and the Respondent and Respondent's witnesses waited for the Petitioner to appear to put on his case. Additionally, various persons in attendance, Respondent's counsel and employees or personnel of the Respondent were requested and did observe within the building at the hearing site and in the immediate environs of the building to see if the Petitioner was observed in the vicinity of the

    hearing site. The Petitioner was not observed in the environs of the hearing site and never appeared at the hearing during the additional time allowed him for his appearance. Finally, after waiting a substantial period of time, as referenced above, it was determined that the Petitioner had not appeared to prosecute his claim and, since the Petitioner bears the burden of proof in this proceeding, it was determined that it was unnecessary for the Respondent to adduce any evidence in support of its position in this case and the hearing was adjourned.

  3. In excess of one month has elapsed since the hearing date, and there has been no communication from the Petitioner with the undersigned, and no indication from the Respondent that any communication from the Petitioner has been received by the Respondent, which might explain the Petitioner's absence from

    the noticed hearing.


    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  4. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction of the subject matter of and the parties to this proceeding. §§ 120.569 and 120.57(1), Fla. Stat.

  5. The Petitioner bears the burden of proof in this proceeding St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993). The Petitioner failed to appear and has failed to communicate with the undersigned and no indication from the Respondent has been received by the undersigned which would

indicate any effort by the Petitioner to communicate with the Respondent on the day of or since the day of the noticed hearing. The Petitioner bears the burden of proof in this proceeding to put on evidence probative of his claims regarding racial discrimination in the employment practices of the Respondent. The Petitioner failed to appear and put on such evidence. Therefore, the Respondent had no necessity to adduce evidence in support of its case. After waiting a substantial period of time, nearly an hour, with no appearance from the Petitioner, the hearing was adjourned. Inasmuch as no cause has been demonstrated by the Petitioner for his failure to appear and prosecute his claims, it is determined that the Petitioner has failed to prosecute his claim. Therefore, at this time, in excess of one month after the time and date set for hearing, this matter should be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

RECOMMENDATION


Having considered the foregoing Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, it is, therefore,

RECOMMENDED that a final order be entered by the Florida Commission on Human Relations dismissing the subject petition in its entirety.

DONE AND ENTERED this 5th day of March, 2008, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

P. MICHAEL RUFF Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 5th day of March, 2008.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Cecil Howard, General Counsel Florida Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, Florida 32301


Denise Crawford, Agency Clerk Florida Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, Florida 32301


M. Kristen Allman, Esquire Oagletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak &

Stewart, P.C.

100 North Tampa Street, Suite 3600 Tampa, Florida 33062


Jimmy O. Gathers 621 Marine Avenue

Panama City, Florida 32401


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 07-004827
Issue Date Proceedings
May 15, 2008 Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice filed.
Mar. 05, 2008 Recommended Order of Dismissal (hearing held January 22, 2008). CASE CLOSED.
Mar. 05, 2008 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Jan. 22, 2008 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Jan. 22, 2008 Respondent`s Amended Exhibit List filed.
Jan. 22, 2008 Respondent`s Witness List filed.
Jan. 22, 2008 Respondent`s Exhibit List filed.
Jan. 22, 2008 Respondent`s Response to Initial Order filed.
Jan. 22, 2008 Respondent`s Answer to Petitioner`s Nonappearance at Deposition filed.
Jan. 22, 2008 Respondent`s Answer to Petitioner`s Petition for Relief filed.
Jan. 22, 2008 Respondent`s Amended Exhibit List filed.
Jan. 22, 2008 Respondent`s Witness List filed.
Jan. 22, 2008 Respondent`s Exhibit List filed.
Jan. 22, 2008 Repondent`s Notice of Petitioner`s Nonappearance at Deposition filed.
Jan. 22, 2008 Respondent`s Answer to Petitioner`s Petition for Relief filed.
Jan. 22, 2008 Unilateral Response to Initial Order filed.
Jan. 17, 2008 Subpoena ad Testificandum filed.
Jan. 15, 2008 Respondent`s Amended Notice of Taking Deposition of Petitioner Jimmy O. Gathers filed.
Jan. 15, 2008 Respondent`s Notice of Taking Deposition of Petitioner Jimmy O. Gathers filed.
Jan. 09, 2008 Notice of Appearance (filed by M. Allman).
Nov. 19, 2007 Agency`s court reporter confirmation letter filed with the Judge.
Nov. 08, 2007 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for January 22, 2008; 10:00 a.m., Central Time; Panama City, FL).
Oct. 23, 2007 Amended Employment Complaint of Discrimination fled.
Oct. 23, 2007 Notice of Determination: No Cause filed.
Oct. 23, 2007 Determination: No Cause filed.
Oct. 23, 2007 Petition for Relief filed.
Oct. 23, 2007 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.
Oct. 23, 2007 Initial Order.

Orders for Case No: 07-004827
Issue Date Document Summary
May 06, 2008 Agency Final Order
Mar. 05, 2008 Recommended Order The Petitioner had the burden of proof on discrimination claims and failed to appear at hearing. No explanation of default was made by Petitioner. The case is dismissed.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer