Petitioner: BIG PIG, INC.
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO
Judges: DANIEL MANRY
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Orlando, Florida
Filed: Jan. 25, 2008
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, July 3, 2008.
Latest Update: Sep. 02, 2008
Summary: The issue is whether Respondent should exclude four entries in quota drawings for alcohol beverage licenses (license quota drawings) pursuant to Subsection 561.19(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2007),1 and Florida Administrative Code Rules 61A-1.006(8) and 61A-5.0105(8).2Respondent correctly rejected entries of corporate applicants as more than one application from 100 percent shareholder. A corporate applicant may challenge an adopted rule in a 120.57 proceeding.
Final Order No, BPR-2008-
6289 ate: 3 |stfog
FILE
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
AGENCY CLERK
SaralWachman, Agency Clerk
Department of Business and Professional Reguiation & oe
Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco G sy
Northwood Centre
1940 North Monroe Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1020
Latino Grande, Inc.
PETITIONER
; CASE NO. 2007-068011
vs.
Department of Business and Professional Regulation | DOAH NO. 08-0495
Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco | SERIES: 4COP
Big Pig, Inc. CASE NOS.2007-068653
2007-068656
2007-068662
vs.
i DOAH NOS. 08-0496
08-0497
08-0498
SERIES: 4COP
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco
RESPONDENT
FINAL ORDER
This matter comes before me for final Agency Order.
The issue before me is whether Respondent should exclude four entries in the quota drawing for
alcoholic beverage licenses (license quota drawings) pursuant to Subsection 561.19(2)(d), Florida
‘Statutes (2007) and Florida Administrative Code Rules 61A-1.006(8) and 61A-5 .0105(8).
Case Numbers: 2007-06801 1, 2007-068653, 2007-068656, 2007-068662
Series: 4COP:
Page 2 of 4
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
lL. By letters dated November 1, 2007, Respondent proposed to reject four applications for
entries into the quota license drawing.
2. Respondent filed a timely requested an administrative hearing to challenge each of the
four proposed rejections and the Respondent referred the matter to the Division of Administrative
Hearings (DOAH) for a formal hearing.
3. A formal hearing was conducted by Administrative Law Judge Daniel Manry on April
3, 2008.
4. A Recommended Order was issued by the Administrative Law Judge on July 3, 2008.
5. Neither party filed exceptions to the Recommended Order.
FINDINGS OF FACT
6. A thorough review of the entire record of this matter reveals that the findings of fact
contained in the recommended order are based on competent, substantial evidence and that the
proceedings on which the findings were based complied with the essential requirements of the law.
7. The Division hereby adopts and incorporates by reference the Findings of Fact as set
forth in the Recommended Order.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
8. A thorough review of the entire record in this matter indicates that the Conclusions of
Law contained in the Recommended Order are reasonable and correct interpretations of the law based
on the Findings of Fact.
9. The Division hereby adopts and incorporates by reference the Conclusions of Law as set
forth in the Recommended Order.
10. This Final Order is entered after a review of the complete record.
Page 2 of 4
Case Numbers: 2007-06801 1, 2007-068653, 2007-068656, 20U7-U68662
Series: 4COP:
Page 3 of 4
ORDER
Having fully considered the complete record of this case and the Recommended Order of the
Administrative Law Judge, I hereby adopt the Recommended Order.
It is ORDERED that the applications filed on behalf of Latino Grande, Inc. and Big Pig, Inc.
will be excluded from the quota license drawing.
DONE and ORDERED at Tallahassee, Florida, this BO_ day of July, 2008.
om
CYNTHIA HILL, Director
Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco
a
This Order of the Director of the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco will become final
unless judicial review is initiated within 30 days of the date of rendition. The rendition date is the date
the Order is filed by the Agency Indexing Clerk. Judicial review may be commenced by filing an
original Notice of Appeal with the Clerk of the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco and a
copy, accompanied by filing fees prescribed by law, with the appropriate District Court of Appeal,
pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes and Rule 9.110, FRAP. A transcript of the informal
hearing may be obtained upon written request received no later than 60 days from the rendition date of
this Order.
Mail Certification: This Final Order was sent by Certified Mail
7007 3020 0000 4298 4488 to:
Jed Berman, Esq.
Infantino and Berman
Post Office Drawer 30
Winter Park, FL 32790
By: or fi ¢ £2 peo 0h Mail Date: g, 08
Page 3 of 4
Case Numbers: 2UU/-V0BUL1, 2UU/-Wu0uss, Luu -yuLNees He very o
Additional copies mailed to:
District Enforcement/Licensing Office
Assistant General Counsel
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
1940 North Monroe Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Series: 4COP:
Page 4 of 4
Daniel Manry
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings
The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, FL 32399-3060
Page 4 of 4
Docket for Case No: 08-000498
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Sep. 02, 2008 |
Final Order filed.
|
Sep. 02, 2008 |
(Second) Final Order filed.
|
Sep. 02, 2008 |
Final Order filed.
|
Aug. 20, 2008 |
Order Setting Aside Final Order filed.
|
Aug. 05, 2008 |
Final Order filed.
|
Jul. 24, 2008 |
Response to Petitioners` Exceptions to Recommended Order filed.
|
Jul. 03, 2008 |
Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
|
Jul. 03, 2008 |
Recommended Order (hearing held April 3, 2008). CASE CLOSED.
|
May 27, 2008 |
Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
|
May 27, 2008 |
Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
|
Apr. 28, 2008 |
Transcript filed. |
Apr. 03, 2008 |
CASE STATUS: Hearing Held. |
Mar. 28, 2008 |
Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for April 3, 2008; 9:30 a.m.; Orlando, FL; amended as to hearing room).
|
Mar. 24, 2008 |
Joint Pretrial Statement filed.
|
Feb. 28, 2008 |
Notice of Taking Deposition filed.
|
Feb. 19, 2008 |
Petitioners` Response to First Requests for Admission filed.
|
Feb. 19, 2008 |
Notice of Filing Answers to Interrogatories filed.
|
Feb. 13, 2008 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Feb. 13, 2008 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for April 3, 2008; 9:30 a.m.; Orlando, FL).
|
Feb. 13, 2008 |
Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 08-0495, 08-0496, 08-0497 and 08-0498).
|
Feb. 06, 2008 |
Notice of Transfer.
|
Feb. 04, 2008 |
Notice of Service of Interrogatories filed.
|
Feb. 04, 2008 |
Respondent`s First Request for Admissions to Petitioner filed.
|
Feb. 01, 2008 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Jan. 28, 2008 |
Initial Order.
|
Jan. 25, 2008 |
DOAH Rule 28-106.201 Petition filed.
|
Jan. 25, 2008 |
Notice of Disapproval filed.
|
Jan. 25, 2008 |
Agency referral filed.
|
Orders for Case No: 08-000498
Issue Date |
Document |
Summary |
Aug. 27, 2008 |
Agency Final Order
|
|
Aug. 27, 2008 |
Agency Final Order
|
|
Jul. 30, 2008 |
Agency Final Order
|
|
Jul. 03, 2008 |
Recommended Order
|
Respondent correctly rejected entries of corporate applicants as more than one application from 100 percent shareholder. A corporate applicant may challenge an adopted rule in a 120.57 proceeding.
|