Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE
Respondent: MATTHEW J. KACHINAS, M.D.
Judges: SUSAN BELYEU KIRKLAND
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Sarasota, Florida
Filed: Aug. 26, 2009
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, January 26, 2010.
Latest Update: May 07, 2010
Summary: The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2002), in DOAH Case No. 09-4678PL; Subsections 456.072(1)(l), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003), in DOAH Case No. 09-4679PL; and Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2005), in DOAH Case No. 09-4680PL, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent committed gross malpractice when he failed to identify the twin with an
Summary: The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2002), in DOAH Case No. 09-4678PL; Subsections 456.072(1)(l), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003), in DOAH Case No. 09-4679PL; and Subsections 458.331(1)(m) and 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2005), in DOAH Case No. 09-4680PL, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent committed gross malpractice when he failed to identify the twin with anomalies in a selected feticide and performed the procedure on the normal twin.
More
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
PETITIONER,
v. CASE NO. 2004-19966 x
Mathew J. Kachinas, M.D., S
RESPONDENT. / 8
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through its
undersigned counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint before the
Board of Medicine against the Respondent, Mathew J. Kachinas, M.D., and
in support thereof alleges:
1. Petitioner is the state department charged with regulating the
practice of medicine pursuant to Section 20.43, Florida Statutes; Chapter
456, Florida Statutes; and Chapter 458, Florida Statutes.
Respondent’s address of record is 1590 Harbor Cay Lane,
2.
Longboat Key, Florida 34228.
J:\pSU\medical\michael Milnes\ac Mike\Kachinas, Mathew J. AC.doc
3. At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent was a
licensed physician within the State of Florida, having been issued license
number ME 65595,
4. Respondent is not Board Certified.
5. On or about March 26, 2004, B.S. traveled from Jacksonville,
Florida, and presented to Premier Institute for Women’s Health (PIWH) for
an elective termination of pregnancy.
6. __ Respondent is the Obstetrician/Gynecologist who handled B.S.'s
procedure at PIWH. .
| 7. On or about March 26, 2004, Respondent determined B.S.'s
pregnancy at approximately twenty-three and a half (2372) to twenty-four
(24) weeks gestation, the last week of the second trimester.
8. On or about March 26, 2004, Respondent states he ordered
and then reviewed a sonogram of B.S. and diagnosed the gestational age
at twenty-four weeks.
9. On or about March 26, 2004, Respondent began the induction
of labor procedure, by ordering the insertion of a Laminaria, an osmotic
cervical dilator which causes the cervix to open and allows easier emptying
of the uterus. The fetus was injected with Digoxin, which is injected
J:\pSU\medical\michael Milnes\ac Mike\Kachinas, Mathew J. AC.doc 2
directly into the fetus to stop the fetal heartbeat, causing an Intrauterine
Fetal Demise (IUFD). B.S. was then released from PIWH.
10. On or about March 27, 2004, Respondent continued with the
induction procedure by administering Cytotec and high does Pitocin to B.S.
to induce labor.
11. On or about March 27, 2004, at approximately 6:30pm,
Respondent transferred and had B.S. admitted to Doctors Hospital of
Sarasota (DHS) for failure to progress with the induction of labor
procedure.
12. Respondent's principal admitting diagnosis was an IUFD at
twenty-four (24) weeks, failure to dilate, and intolerance to the induction
of labor. B.S. was admitted for an Exploratory Laparotomy, Hysterotomy,
evacuation of the fetus, and Bilateral Tubal Ligation.
13. Respondent performed the above described procedures on
patient B.S.
14. On or about March 28, 2004, following B.S. surgery,
Respondent listed the post-operative diagnosis as a failure to induce labor,
an intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD), a thin umbilical cord, and asymmetric
intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), a condition in which the fetus is
smaller than expected for the number of weeks of pregnancy.
J:\pSU\medical\michael Milnes\ac Mike\Kachinas, Mathew J. AC.doc 3
15. Respondent lists in the DHS medical records that a single non-
viable male fetus was removed:from the uterine cavity. The condition of
the fetus indicated an IUFD of at least forty eight hours.
16. On the fetal death certificate, Respondent listed the immediate
Causes for the IUFD as a probable cord incident and multiple placental
infarctions. The fetus died before labor and the clinical estimate of |
gestation is twenty-four (24) weeks.
17. Placental infarctions are small deposits of a fibrous protein,
caused by interference with the maternal circulation, which occur normally
in the placenta as pregnancy progresses. Placental infarctions usually do
not affect the fetus unless the process is extensive.
18. On the fetal death certificate, Respondent did not document
the elective termination or the Digoxin injection.
19. There are no indications in the medical records or the autopsy
report that suggests the fetus suffered a cord incident. This is in
contradiction to Respondent's diagnoses. .
20. On or about April 26, 2004, the autopsy report from Sarasota
Pathology reported a stillborn male with no obvious congenital anomaly, no
intracranial hemorrhage and normal heart, lungs, and liver. The autopsy
report does not indicate extensive placental infarctions or that the
J:\pSU\medical\michael Milnes\ac Mike\Kachinas, Mathew J. AC.doc 4
infarctions caused any harm to the fetus. This is in contradiction to
Respondent's diagnoses.
21. Respondent does not document an adequate patient history in
the medical records.
22. Respondent does not document a physical examination prior to
the insertion of the Laminaria in the medical records.
23. Respondent does not document the use of the Digoxin in the
medical records.
24. Respondent does not document the time of the fetal demise in
the medical records.
25. Respondent falsified the cause of death on the fetal death
certificate.
COUNT ONE
26. Petitioner realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1)
through twenty-five (25) as if fully set forth herein.
27. Section 456.072(1)(1), Florida Statutes (2003), provides making
or filing a report which the licensee knows to be false, intentionally or
negligently failing to file a report or record required by state or federal law,
or willfully impeding or obstructing another person to do so constitutes
grounds for disciplinary action by the Board of Medicine.
J:\pSU\medical\michael Milnes\ac Mike\Kachinas, Mathew J. AC.doc 5
28. Respondent made or filed a report which the licensee knows to
be false in one or more of the following ways:
a. By listing the cause of death on the fetal death certificate
as stillborn by a probable cord incident, when the actual cause
of death was the Digoxin injection administered during the
elective termination procedure;
b. By failing to include the elective termination of pregnancy,
by digoxin injection, on the fetal death certificate.
29. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
458.331(1)(I), Florida Statutes (2003), by making or filing a report which
the licensee knows to be false, intentionally or negligently failing to file a
report or record required by state or federal law, or willfully impeding or
obstructing another person to do so.
COUNT TWO
30. Petitioner realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1)
through twenty-five (25) as if fully set forth herein. |
31. Section 458.331(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2003), provides failing
to keep legible, medical records, identifying the licensed physician by name
and professional title, who is or are responsible for rendering, ordering,
J:\pSU\medical\michael Milnes\ac Mike\Kachinas, Mathew J. AC.doc 6
supervising, or billing for each diagnostic or treatment procedure, and
justifies the course of treatment of the Patient, including but not limited to,
Patient histories; examination results; test results, records of drugs
prescribed, dispensed, or administered; and reports of consultations and
hospitalizations constitutes grounds for disciplinary action by the Board of
Medicine.
32. Respondent failed to keep legible, medical records that
document the justification for the course of treatment in one or more of
the following ways:
a. By failing to document an adequate patient history;
b. By failing to document a physical examination prior to the
insertion of the Laminaria;
c. By failing to document the time of the fetal demise;
od. By falsifying the fetal death certificate.
33. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section .
458,331(1)(m), Florida Statutes: (2003), by failing to: keep legible, medical
records that identify the licensed physician by name and professional title,
who is or are responsible for rendering, ordering, supervising, or billing for
each diagnostic or treatment procedure, and justifies the course of
treatment of the Patient, including but not limited to, Patient histories;
J:\pSU\medical\michael Milnes\ac Mike\Kachinas, Mathew J. AC.doc 7
examination results; test results, records of drugs prescribed, dispensed, or
administered; and reports of consultations and hospitalizations.
COUNT THREE
34. Petitioner realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) |
through twenty-five (25) as if fully set forth herein.
35. Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003), provides that
failing to practice medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment
which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being
acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances constitutes grounds
for disciplinary action by the Board of Medicine.
36. Respondent failed to practice medicine with that level of care,
skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar
physician as being acceptable under similar circumstances, in one or more
of the following ways:
a. By failing to obtain an adequate patient history;
b. By failing to perform a physical examination prior to the
insertion of the Laminaria;
c. By failing to document the time of the fetal demise.
37. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003), by failing to practice medicine with
J:\pSU\medical\michaet Milnes\ac Mike\Kachinas, Mathew J. AC.doc 8
that level of care, skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably
prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and
circumstances.
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board of
Medicine enter an order imposing one or more of the following penalties:
permanent revocation or suspension of Respondent's license, restriction of
practice, imposition of an administrative fine, issuance of a reprimand,
placement of the Respondent on probation, corrective action, refund of
fees billed or collected, remedial education and/or any other relief that the
Board deems appropriate.
J:\pSU\medical\michael Milnes\ac Mike\Kachinas, Mathew J. AC.doc 9
> ' r |
SIGNED this _— day of - 2007.
Ana M. Viamonte Ros, M.D., M.P.H.
Secretary of Health
lf
(|
Michael D. Milnes
Assistant General Counsel
DOH Prosecution Services Unit
4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin C-65
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Tallahassee, FL 32399-3265
CLERK RCO KOCk Florida Bar # 0857491
paTe__