STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) Case No. 09-6152
)
AIKEEA HOWELL, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
Pursuant to notice, a hearing was conducted in this case pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, on January 22, 2010, by video teleconference at sites in West Palm Beach and Tallahassee, Florida, before Stuart M. Lerner, a duly-designated Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH).
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: Sonia E. Hill-Howard, Esquire
Vicki L. Evans-Pare, Esquire Palm Beach County School Board
3318 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite C-302 West Palm Beach, Florida 33406
For Respondent: Aikeea Howell, pro se
5145 Caribbean Boulevard, Apt. 1027 West Palm Beach, Florida 33407
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
Whether Respondent's employment should be terminated for the reasons set forth in the Petition for Suspension Without Pay and Dismissal from Employment.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
By letter dated September 29, 2009, the Palm Beach County Superintendent of Schools notified Respondent that, at the October 14, 2009, meeting of the Palm Beach County School Board (School Board), he would be recommending to the School Board that it terminate Respondent's employment as a school bus attendant. The letter further advised Respondent of her right to "request[] a hearing before the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH)." Respondent subsequently requested such a hearing. On November 9, 2009, the matter was referred to DOAH for the assignment of an administrative law judge to conduct the hearing Respondent had requested. Among the documents transmitted to DOAH by the School Board was a Petition for Suspension Without Pay and Dismissal from Employment (Petition) prepared by the School Board's counsel of record and served on Respondent. The Petition alleged that Respondent's record of inattentiveness while on duty warranted her termination.
As noted above, the final hearing in this case was held on January 22, 2010. Four witnesses testified at the hearing: Respondent, Yevola Falana, George Pratt, and Angelette Green.
In addition to the testimony of these four witnesses, the following exhibits were offered and received into evidence: Petitioner's Exhibits 1, 3 through 12, 14, 15A, 15B, and 16
through 22.
After the close of the evidentiary portion of the hearing, the undersigned, on the record, established a deadline (20 days from the date of the filing of the hearing transcript with DOAH) for the filing of proposed recommended orders.
The Transcript of the hearing (consisting of one volume) was filed with DOAH on February 8, 2010.
On March 1, 2010, the School Board filed a motion requesting that the proposed recommended order deadline be extended until April 2, 2010. On March 2, 2010, the undersigned issued an order extending the deadline, but only to March 18, 2010.
On March 18, 2010, the School Board filed its Proposed Recommended Order. To date, Respondent has not filed any post- hearing submittal.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based on the evidence adduced at the final hearing, and the record as a whole, the following findings of fact are made:
The School Board is responsible for the operation, control, and supervision of all public school operations in Palm Beach County.
Respondent has been employed by the School Board as a school bus attendant since January 25, 2006. She is currently under suspension pending the outcome of these proceedings.
As a school bus attendant employed by the School Board, Respondent is a member of a collective bargaining unit represented by the SEIU/Florida Public Services Union (SEIU) and covered by a collective bargaining agreement between the School Board and SEIU (SEIU Contract).
Article 7 of the SEIU Contract is entitled, "Employees Contractual Rights." Section 2 of this article provides as follows:
Upon successful completion of the probationary period by the employee, the employee status shall be continuous unless the Superintendent terminates the employee for reasons stated in Article 17 - Discipline of Employees (Progressive Discipline).
In the event the Superintendent seeks termination of a continuous employee, the School Board may suspend the employee with or without pay. The employee shall receive written notice and shall have the opportunity to formally appeal the termination. The appeals process shall be determined in accordance with Article 17 - Discipline of Employees (Progressive Discipline).
Article 8 of the SEIU Contract is entitled, "Management Rights," and it provides, in pertinent part, that the School Board has the right "to manage and direct its employees,
establish reasonable rules and procedures, take disciplinary action for proper cause, and relieve its employees from duty because of lack of work or for other legitimate reasons."
As is its right under Article 8 of the SEIU Contract, the School Board has established requirements for its school bus attendants. These requirements are set forth in a School Bus Drivers and Bus Attendants Handbook (SDSBA Handbook) distributed to each and every school bus driver and school bus attendant employed by the School Board.
The SDSBA Handbook provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
X. Transportation of Exceptional Students by School Bus Drivers and Bus Attendants
* * *
B. Bus attendant shall be assigned to ESE routes when necessary and when
possible. . . .
* * *
D. The ESE Bus Attendant
* * *
. . . . His regular assigned seat should be at the rear of the bus to facilitate student observation and behavior management.
Assists the bus driver, parents, and school personnel in loading and unloading students at bus stops and school centers, as necessary and as directed. . . .
5. Assists the bus driver and students in following the school bus rules and procedures.
* * *
Assures that all seat belts, wheelchair securements, and occupant restraints are put away or locked in the seats when not in use to avoid safety hazards.
Shall be alert to student passenger needs at all times, getting up to assist students in route, providing directions to students, and maintaining order. However, unless attending to a student's needs, the attendant shall remain seated at the rear of the bus when the bus is in motion.
* * *
11. Performs other relevant duties as required, such as securing wheelchairs, securing students in their occupant restraints, cleaning up students, helping the driver clean up the bus, putting windows up and down, safely securing carry-on items, securing wheelchair trays, and assisting the driver in performing the Pre-Trip and Post- Trip Inspections.
* * *
14. Shall be thoroughly familiar and perform in accordance with the training Handbooks of this School District: School Bus Drivers and Bus Attendants Handbook; and Special Needs Student Transportation Bus Drivers and Bus Attendants Handbook.
The Special Needs Student Transportation Bus Drivers and Bus Attendants Handbook, which is referenced in the SDSBA Handbook, stated the following, among other things, regarding the job responsibilities of "ESE Bus Attendants":
Overview of the Job of the Bus Attendant
. . . . The Bus Attendant assists the Bus Driver with bus cleanliness, emergency situations, pre-trip and post-trip bus safety inspections, and knowing the route.
* * * Preparing for Daily Trips
* * *
Check the wheelchair securement and occupant restraints for proper functioning. . . .
Help the Bus Driver perform the pre-trip inspections.
Help the Bus Driver clean up the bus.
* * *
Safely secure any loose items. Make sure that seat belts, wheel chair securements, and occupant restraints are put away or locked in the seats when not in use in order to avoid hazards.
Working with Students
A major duty that is required of a Bus Attendant is to care for students while they are on the bus. This means that you are to get out of your seat as necessary to be sure that students are safe, following the bus rules, and are not in any physical, health, or medical danger. You also must assist the Bus Driver, parents, and school personnel with loading and unloading of students at bus stops and school centers. You will do this as necessary and as directed.
Specifically Bus Attendants must:
Assist all pre-school students up and down the bus stairwell.
Assist physically impaired students up and down the bus stairwell.
Help any student who needs your assistance getting onto/off the bus.
Open and close the bus lift door and assist students who are in a wheelchair onto/off the lift in the absence of a parent or school person, or when a parent/guardian cannot help due to extenuating circumstances.
Operate the wheelchair lift.
Secure wheelchairs, and secure students in their occupant restraint systems.
Clean up students and the bus when students have soiled themselves.
Help the students to follow the bus rules and procedures.
Be alert to student passenger needs at all times. Give assistance to students, provide direction to them and help to maintain order on the bus.
* * *
Where you place yourself on the bus is important. It is generally recommended that a Bus Attendant sit at the back of the bus, which allows you to watch the students in front of you. . . .
Article 17 of the SEIU Contract addresses "[d]iscipline of [e]mployees" and provides as follows:
Without the consent of the employee and the Union, disciplinary action may not be taken against an employee except for just
cause, and this must be substantiated by clear and convincing evidence which supports the recommended disciplinary action.
All disciplinary action shall be governed by applicable statutes and provisions of the Agreement. Further, an employee shall be provided with a written charge of wrongdoing, setting forth the specific charges against that employee as soon as possible after the investigation has begun.
Any information which may be relied upon to take action against an employee will be shared promptly with said employee and his/her Union representative as soon as possible. Copies of any written information/correspondence that is related to the action of the employee or the investigating administrator(s) will be provided promptly to the employee and his/her Union representative.
An employee against whom action is to be taken under this Article and his/her Union representative shall have the right to review and refute any and all of the information relied upon to support any proposed disciplinary action prior to taking such action. To this end, the employee and the Union representative shall be afforded a reasonable amount of time to prepare and present responses/refutations concerning the pending disciplinary action and concerning the appropriateness of the proposed disciplinary action. This amount of time is to be mutually agreed upon by the parties.
Only previous disciplinary actions which are a part of the employee's personnel file or which are a matter of record as provided in paragraph #7 below may be cited if these previous actions are reasonably related to the existing charge.
Where just cause warrants such disciplinary action(s) and in keeping with provisions of this Article, an employee may be reprimanded verbally, reprimanded in writing, suspended without pay, or dismissed upon the recommendation of the immediate supervisor to the Superintendent and final action taken by the District. Other disciplinary action(s) may be taken with the mutual agreement of the parties.
Except in cases which clearly constitute a real and immediate danger to the District or the actions/inactions of the employee constitute such clearly flagrant and purposeful violations of reasonable School Board rules and regulations, progressive discipline shall be administered as follows:
Verbal Reprimand With A Written Notation. Such written notation shall be placed in the employee's personnel file and shall not be used to the further detriment of the employee, unless, there is another reasonably related act by the same employee within a twenty four (24) month period.
Written Reprimand. A written reprimand may be issued to an employee when appropriate in keeping with provisions of this Article. Such written reprimand shall be dated and signed by the giver of the reprimand and shall be filed in the affected employee's personnel file upon a receipt of a copy to the employee by certified mail.
Suspension Without Pay. A suspension without pay by the School Board may be issued to an employee, when appropriate, in keeping with provisions of this Article, including just cause and applicable laws. The length of the suspension also shall be determined by just cause as set forth in this Article. The notice and specifics of the suspension shall be placed in writing, dated, and signed by the giver of the suspension and a copy provided to the
employee by certified mail. The specific days of suspension will be clearly set forth in the written suspension notice which shall be filed in the affected employee's personnel file in keeping with provisions of Chapter 119 and 231.291 of the Florida Statutes.
An employee may be dismissed when appropriate in keeping with provisions of this Article, including just cause and applicable law.
An employee against whom disciplinary action(s) has/have been taken may appeal through the grievance procedure. However, if the disciplinary action(s) is/are to be taken by the District, then the employee shall have a choice of appeal between either the Department [sic] of Administrative Hearings in accordance with Florida Statutes or the grievance procedure outlined in the collective bargaining agreement. Such choice must be exercised within fifteen (15) days of receipt of written notification of disciplinary action being taken, and the District notified accordingly. If the grievance procedure is selected, the grievance shall be initiated at Step Three.
Respondent has been disciplined by the School Board on previous occasions for failing to properly perform her job duties as an ESE school bus attendant.
On August 26, 2008, Respondent received a verbal reprimand with written notation "for failing to ensure the safety and well-being of students under [her] care as a bus attendant." The letter advising her of such disciplinary action read as follows:
This correspondence is being given to you as a verbal reprimand with written notation for failing to ensure the safety and well-being of students under your care as a bus attendant. Specifically, on June 6, 2008, during your pre-disciplinary meeting you stated that you take a nonprescription medication that makes you sleepy.
Furthermore, the review of two (2) videos from buses that you served as an attendant revealed you were asleep and not seated in the rear of the bus while students were being transported. Additionally, these acts w[ere] confirmed by Ms. Evangelina Patterson who stated that you have fallen asleep on every route that you served as an attendant on her bus.
Your conduct reflects a failure to exercise the best professional judgment. In addition, you compromised the safety and well-being of a student that you were responsible for monitoring by failing to be alert and properly positioned to carry out your duties as an attendant. This behavior is not permissible according to The School District of Palm Beach County, Transportation Department School Bus Drivers and Bus Attendants Handbook, Sec. X D.8 and Special Needs Student Transportation Bus Drivers and Attendants Handbook Chapter II. Furthermore, you are directed to desist from engaging in the same or similar actions in the future. Failure to do so will result in further disciplinary action, up to and including termination. This letter of verbal reprimand with written notation will be placed in your District personnel file.
Please be advised that the above referenced case and related investigative file is considered to be closed. Pursuant to Section 1012.31, Florida Statutes, when an investigation is concluded, all materials related to the investigation shall be treated as a public record, subject to disclosure upon request, minus any allowable
exemptions. In addition, you have the right to inspect this public record and to submit any written rebuttal information for enclosure into the public record within ten days after receipt of this letter.
On October 28, 2008, Respondent was given a written reprimand "for failing to ensure the safety and well-being of students under [her] care as a bus attendant." This written reprimand was in the form of a letter, which read as follows
This correspondence is being given to you as a written reprimand for failing to ensure the safety and well-being of students under your care as a bus attendant. Specifically on October 22, 2008, during your pre- disciplinary meeting you stated that you were not fully alert while serving as an attendant on Route E536. Furthermore, a review of the video from this bus revealed that you were asleep while students were being transported.
Your conduct reflects a failure to exercise the best professional judgment. In addition, you compromised the safety and well-being of a student that you were responsible for monitoring by failing to be alert and properly positioned to carry out your duties as an attendant.. This behavior is not permissible according to The School District of Palm Beach County, Transportation Department School Bus Drivers and Bus Attendants Handbook, Sec. X D.8 and Special Needs Student Transportation Bus Drivers and Attendants Handbook Chapter II. Furthermore, you are directed to desist from engaging in the same or similar actions in the future. Failure to do so will result in further disciplinary action, up to and including termination. This written reprimand will be placed in your District personnel file.
Please be advised that the above referenced case and related investigative file is considered to be closed. Pursuant to Section 1012.31, Florida Statutes, when an investigation is concluded, all materials related to the investigation shall be treated as a public record, subject to disclosure upon request, minus any allowable exemptions. In addition, you have the right to inspect this public record and to submit any written rebuttal information for enclosure into the public record within ten days after receipt of this letter.
Notwithstanding (and in brazen disregard of) the reasonable directive contained in this written reprimand that she "desist from engaging in the same or similar actions in the future," less than three months later, on the morning of
January 22, 2009, Respondent was once again inattentive while on duty as an ESE school bus attendant.
The bus to which she was assigned that morning was Bus #0691, which was driven by Evangelina Patterson. There was an operational video camera (with audio), mounted in the front of the interior of the bus, which captured what occurred on the bus that morning.
At 8:08 a.m., Bus #0691 arrived at the school to which the three students then on the bus were being transported. The students unfastened their seat belts, got out of their seats, and exited the bus. Instead of escorting the students off the bus, Respondent stayed in her seat, put her jacket over her face, and leaned her head against the window in an admitted
effort to get some rest. She remained essentially in this position for at least the next 18 minutes, keeping her jacket over her face the entire time, except for a brief moment (at approximately 8:16 a.m.) when, startled by a tap on the leg from the driver, Ms. Patterson, who was trying to rouse her, she temporarily removed the jacket. During this 18-minute period, without Respondent's assistance, Ms. Patterson did her post-trip inspection and readied the bus for its next trip that morning.
On this next trip, the bus picked up three students and transported them to their high school. For at least the last seven or eight minutes of the trip, none of the three students was wearing a seat belt, a situation that Respondent did nothing, during that time period, to try to correct.
One of the three unbelted students (seated three rows in front of Respondent) had his back facing the window and his left lower leg and foot in the aisle. The student's book bag was also in the aisle, immediately next to his left foot, so that the entire width of the aisle was blocked.
For almost all of this seven or eight-minute period at the end of the trip, Respondent's eyes were closed and her head was bobbing back and forth. She had no interaction with the students on the bus. After the bus arrived at the school, Respondent walked behind the students as they exited the bus.
As she passed by the camera in the front of the bus, Respondent
looked like she had just woken up, with her eyes appearing to be adjusting to the light.
Respondent has demonstrated, through her actions, that she cannot be depended upon to be alert and attentive at all times while on duty and to otherwise discharge her job responsibilities as a school bus attendant in a manner that will ensure the safety of the students in her care and that will not expose the School Board to liability. Consequently, her continued employment as a school bus attendant constitutes a real and immediate danger to the School Board.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
DOAH has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this proceeding and of the parties hereto.
"In accordance with the provisions of s. 4(b) of Art.
IX of the State Constitution, district school boards [have the authority to] operate, control, and supervise all free public schools in their respective districts and may exercise any power except as expressly prohibited by the State Constitution or general law." § 1001.32(2), Fla. Stat.
Such authority extends to personnel matters and includes the power to suspend and dismiss employees. See § 1001.42(5), Fla. Stat. ("The district school board, acting as a board, shall exercise all powers and perform all duties listed below: PERSONNEL.--. . . provide for the . . . suspension, and
dismissal of employees subject to the requirements of chapter 1012."); § 1012.22(1)(f), Fla. Stat. ("The district school board shall suspend, dismiss, or return to annual contract members of the instructional staff and other school employees."); and § 1012.23(1), Fla. Stat. ("Except as otherwise provided by law or the State Constitution, district school boards may adopt rules governing personnel matters, including the assignment of duties and responsibilities for all district employees.").
A district school board is deemed to be the "public employer," as that term is used in Chapter 447, Part II, Florida Statutes, "with respect to all employees of the school district." § 447.203(2), Fla. Stat.
As such, it has the right "to direct its employees, take disciplinary action for proper cause, and relieve its employees from duty because of lack of work or for other legitimate reasons." § 447.209, Fla. Stat.
Where the employee is an "educational support employee" who has successfully completed his or her probationary period and the adverse action sought to be taken against the employee is termination, the district school board must act in accordance with the provisions of Section 1012.40, Florida Statutes, which provides as follows:
(1) As used in this section:
"Educational support employee" means any person employed by a district school system who is employed as a teacher assistant, an education paraprofessional, a member of the transportation department, a member of the operations department, a member of the maintenance department, a member of food service, a secretary, or a clerical employee, or any other person who by virtue of his or her position of employment is not required to be certified by the Department of Education or district school board pursuant to s. 1012.39. This section does not apply to persons employed in confidential or management positions. This section applies to all employees who are not temporary or casual and whose duties require 20 or more hours in each normal working week.
"Employee" means any person employed as an educational support employee.
(2)(a) Each educational support employee shall be employed on probationary status for a period to be determined through the appropriate collective bargaining agreement or by district school board rule in cases where a collective bargaining agreement does not exist.
Upon successful completion of the probationary period by the employee, the employee's status shall continue from year to year unless the district school superintendent terminates the employee for reasons stated in the collective bargaining agreement, or in district school board rule in cases where a collective bargaining agreement does not exist, or reduces the number of employees on a districtwide basis for financial reasons.
In the event a district school superintendent seeks termination of an
employee, the district school board may suspend the employee with or without pay. The employee shall receive written notice and shall have the opportunity to formally appeal the termination. The appeals process shall be determined by the appropriate collective bargaining process or by district school board rule in the event there is no collective bargaining agreement.
Respondent is an "educational support employee," within the meaning of Section 1012.40, Florida Statutes, who is covered by a collective bargaining agreement (the SEIU Contract).
Pursuant to Section 1012.40, Florida Statutes, Respondent's employment may be terminated only "for reasons stated in th[is] collective bargaining agreement."
Under the SEIU Contract, "disciplinary action may not be taken against an employee except for just cause, and this must be substantiated by clear and convincing evidence." Moreover, absent compelling circumstances, the action taken must be consistent with "progressive discipline."
At the final hearing in the instant case, the School Board clearly and convincingly established that, on the morning of January 22, 2009, while serving as an ESE school bus attendant aboard Bus #0691, Respondent was, for significant periods of times, grossly inattentive to what was happening on the bus, contrary not only to School Board policy (of which Respondent had been made aware), but also to supervisory
directives given her in conjunction with prior disciplinary action taken against her for the same dereliction (the
August 26, 2008, verbal reprimand with written notation and the October 28, 2008, written reprimand).
Having made such a clear and convincing showing, and having further established that a real and immediate danger is posed by its continuing to employ a school bus attendant, like Respondent, who has proven not to be reliably attentive while on duty, the School Board has met its burden of demonstrating that there are grounds to terminate Respondent's employment under the SEIU Contract.
Accordingly, Respondent's appeal of her proposed termination must be rejected.
Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is hereby
RECOMMENDED that the School Board issue a final order sustaining Respondent's suspension and terminating her employment with the School Board.
DONE AND ENTERED this 23rd day of March, 2010, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
S
STUART M. LERNER
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
Fax Filing (850) 921-6847
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 23rd day of March, 2010.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Vicki L. Evans-Pare, Esquire Palm Beach County School Board Post Office Box 19239
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-9239
Aikeea Howell
5145 Caribbean Boulevard, Apt. 1027 West Palm Beach, Florida 33407
Dr. Arthur C. Johnson Superintendent
Palm Beach County School Board 3340 Forest Hill Boulevard, C316
West Palm Beach, Florida 33406-5869
Deborah K. Kearney, General Counsel Department of Education
Turlington Building, Suite 1244
325 West Gaines Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400
Dr. Eric J. Smith Commissioner of Education Department of Education
Turlington Building, Suite 1514
325 West Gaines Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within
15 days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions to this recommended order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Aug. 16, 2010 | Agency Final Order | |
Mar. 23, 2010 | Recommended Order | Petitioner established that Respondent was grossly inattentive while on duty and that therefore her termination was justified under the collective bargaining agreement. |
SCHOOL BOARD OF HIGHLANDS COUNTY vs MARY JANE NILSEN, 09-006152TTS (2009)
SARASOTA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs NANCY JONES, 09-006152TTS (2009)
ESCAMBIA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs LULA WILLIAMS, 09-006152TTS (2009)
PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs LARRY JACKSON, 09-006152TTS (2009)
HERNANDO COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs ANGELO DIPAOLO, 09-006152TTS (2009)