Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

EVERETT FRAIZER vs HANDI HOUSES OF STARKE, 10-006053 (2010)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 10-006053 Visitors: 14
Petitioner: EVERETT FRAIZER
Respondent: HANDI HOUSES OF STARKE
Judges: LAWRENCE P. STEVENSON
Agency: Florida Commission on Human Relations
Locations: Sumatra, Florida
Filed: Jul. 22, 2010
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, May 26, 2011.

Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2011
Summary: The issue is whether Respondent, Handi House of Starke, Inc. ("Handi House") committed unlawful employment practices contrary to section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2008),1/ by discriminating against Petitioner based on his race by subjecting him to different terms and conditions than similarly situated employees outside of his protected classification, and by discharging Petitioner from his employment after a dispute with a similarly situated employee outside of his protected classification.Petit
More
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS


EVERETTE FRAZIER, EEOC Case No. 15D201000225


Petitioner, FCHR Case No. 2010-00604


v. DOAH Case No. 10-6053


HANDI HOUSE OF STARKE, INC., FCHR Order No. 11-065


Respondent.

/


FINAL ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM AN UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE


Preliminary Matters


Petitioner Everette Frazier filed a complaint of discrimination pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Sections 760.01 - 760.11, Florida Statutes (2009), alleging that Respondent Handi House of Starke, Inc., committed an unlawful employment practice on the basis of Petitioner’s race (Black) by terminating Petitioner from employment.

The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on June 16, 2010, the Executive Director issued his determination finding that there was reasonable cause to believe that an unlawful employment practice had occurred.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice, and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.

An evidentiary hearing was held in Starke, Florida, on December 14, 2010, and March 29, 2011, before Administrative Law Judge Lawrence P. Stevenson.

Judge Stevenson issued a Recommended Order of dismissal, dated May 26, 2011.

The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.


Findings of Fact


A transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge was not filed with the Commission. In the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge, the Recommended Order is the only evidence for the Commission to consider. See National Industries, Inc. v. Commission on Human Relations, et al., 527 So. 2d 894, at 897, 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Accord, Mack v.

Agency for Persons with Disabilities, FCHR Order No. 11-026 (March 17, 2011), Hall v. Villages of West Oaks HOA, FCHR Order No. 08-007 (January 14, 2008), Beach-



Filed August 2, 2011 8:23 AM Division of Administrative Hearings


Gutierrez v. Bay Medical Center, FCHR Order No. 05-011 (January 19, 2005), and Waaser v. Streit’s Motorsports, FCHR Order No. 04-157 (November 30, 2004).

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s findings of fact.


Conclusions of Law


We find the Administrative Law Judge’s application of the law to the facts to result in a correct disposition of the matter.

We note that the Administrative Law Judge made the following finding of fact: “Ms. Hewes testified that she would have offered to bring Petitioner back to work at Handi House if not for his insistent pursuit of what she considered an unfounded and insulting claim of racial discrimination.” Recommended Order, ¶ 21.

The Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 states: “It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer…to discriminate against any person…because that person has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this section.” Section 760.10(7), Florida Statutes (2009).

The above set out finding of fact suggests a potential violation of the above statute section prohibiting retaliation for filing a complaint under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992.

However, we note that there is no finding that after being told to stay away from Respondent’s property Petitioner asked to return to employment with Respondent. In the absence of such a finding an unlawful employment practice based on retaliation could not have occurred. See Huth v. National Admark Corporation, 23 F.A.L.R. 4077 (FCHR 2000), adopting conclusions of law in the Recommended Order which state, “Absent a showing that she was an applicant for employment or that she became an employee,

Petitioner lacks a statutory basis for seeking relief from an unlawful employment practice.”

In addition, we note that the Complaint of Discrimination filed by Petitioner with the Commission contains no allegations of unlawful retaliation. A Commission Panel has noted, “…failure to include a particular charge in one’s complaint filed with the Florida Commission on Human Relations precluded the inclusion of the charge in one’s petition for relief.” Thompson v. ACS, f/k/a Concera Corporation, FCHR Order No. 04-137 (October 1, 2004).

With these comments, we adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s conclusions of

law.


Exceptions


Neither of the parties filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge’s Recommended Order.


Dismissal


The Petition for Relief and Complaint of Discrimination are DISMISSED with prejudice.

The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110.


DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of August , 2011. FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS:


Commissioner Donna Elam, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner Watson Haynes, II; and Commissioner Mario M. Valle


Filed this 2nd day of August , 2011, in Tallahassee, Florida.


/s/

Violet Crawford, Clerk Commission on Human Relations

2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, FL 32301

(850) 488-7082


NOTICE TO COMPLAINANT / PETITIONER


As your complaint was filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which is enforced by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), you have the right to request EEOC to review this Commission’s final agency action. To secure a “substantial weight review” by EEOC, you must request it in writing within 15 days of your receipt of this Order. Send your request to Miami District Office (EEOC), One Biscayne Tower, 2 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2700, 27th Floor, Miami, FL 33131.


Copies furnished to:


Everette Frazier

14163 Southeast 44th Street Starke, FL 32091


Handi House of Starke, Inc. c/o Christy Hewes

Post Office Box 776 Starke, FL 32091


Lawrence P. Stevenson, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel


I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed to the above listed addressees this 2nd day of August , 2011.


By: /s/

Clerk of the Commission

Florida Commission on Human Relations

FCHR 2010-00604 EEOC 15D201000225 FCHR Order No. 11-065


Type of case: Employment


Basis of discrimination: race (Black) Commission staff determination: No Cause ALJ recommendation: dismissal

Commission panel final action: Adopt Recommended Order


Key Words: race, discharge, no transcript, finding almost amounting to unlawful retaliation – but all elements not present, retaliation claim not included in complaint.


ADDRESSES FOR NOTICE:


For Petitioner…..


Everette Frazier

14163 Southeast 44th Street Starke, FL 32091


For Respondent…..


Handi House of Starke, Inc. c/o Christy Hewes

Post Office Box 776 Starke, FL 32091


DOCKET INFORMATION:


Rec Order: Dismissal Transcript: No Exhibits: Yes Exceptions: No

COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS


Order Approval/Disapproval


TO: FCHR Commissioners impaneled to decide the below-referenced case FROM: Jim Mallue, Assistant General Counsel

RE: Frazier v. Handi House of Starke, Inc.

DOAH 10-6053; FCHR 2010-00604; FCHR Order No. 11-065


Accompanying this “Order Approval/Disapproval” page is a copy of a final order drafted by the Panel’s counsel / legal advisor containing counsel’s recommendation to you regarding the disposition of the case. This case has been returned to the Commission from the Division of Administrative Hearings.


Please review the case record and determine whether you are in agreement with the recommendations contained in the order drafted by Commission counsel.


Further, please indicate your approval or disapproval of the order drafted by Commission counsel by signing on the appropriate line below, and returning this form by FAX to Denise Crawford in the Commission’s Tallahassee office at 850-488-5291, and by then returning this form by Mail to Ms. Denise Crawford, Clerk of the Commission, Florida Commission on Human Relations, 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100, Tallahassee, FL 32301. If a majority of the panel approves of the order, the order will be entered by the Clerk of the Commission.


# # #


I approve of the order drafted to reflect the Commission’s disposition of this matter:


, Commissioner.


I do not approve of the order drafted to reflect the Commission’s disposition of this matter:


, Commissioner.


END


Docket for Case No: 10-006053
Issue Date Proceedings
Aug. 02, 2011 Agency Final Order filed.
May 31, 2011 Transmittal letter from Claudia Llado forwarding Petitioner's exhibits to the Petitioner.
May 26, 2011 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
May 26, 2011 Recommended Order (hearing held December 14, 2010, and March 29, 2011). CASE CLOSED.
Mar. 29, 2011 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Jan. 14, 2011 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for March 29, 2011; 1:00 p.m.; Starke, FL).
Jan. 10, 2011 Letter to DOAH from C. Hewes regarding available dates filed.
Jan. 03, 2011 Order (parties to advise of prospective hearing dates on or before January 14, 2011).
Jan. 03, 2011 Notice of Ex-parte Communication.
Dec. 20, 2010 Letter to DOAH from C. Hewes requesting to have another hearing and closed not to be closed filed.
Dec. 15, 2010 Order to Show Cause.
Dec. 14, 2010 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Nov. 23, 2010 Letter to DOAH from E. Fraizer regarding a settlement filed.
Oct. 08, 2010 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for December 14, 2010; 10:00 a.m.; Starke, FL).
Oct. 06, 2010 Letter to DOAH from E. Fraizer requesting to re-scheduling for October 8, 2010 filed.
Sep. 23, 2010 Order Granting Continuance (parties to advise status by October 4, 2010).
Sep. 23, 2010 Letter to DOAH from C. Hewes requesting to reschedule hearing filed.
Aug. 03, 2010 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Aug. 03, 2010 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for September 24, 2010; 10:00 a.m.; Starke, FL).
Aug. 02, 2010 Response to Initial Order filed.
Aug. 02, 2010 Letter to DOAH from E. Fraizer requesting to be resolved today filed.
Jul. 22, 2010 Employment Complaint of Discrimination fled.
Jul. 22, 2010 Determination: Cause filed.
Jul. 22, 2010 Notice of Determination: Cause filed.
Jul. 22, 2010 Petition for Relief filed.
Jul. 22, 2010 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.
Jul. 22, 2010 Initial Order.

Orders for Case No: 10-006053
Issue Date Document Summary
Aug. 02, 2011 Agency Final Order
May 26, 2011 Recommended Order Petitioner failed to prove that his dismissal was due to anything other than his own erratic job performance over many years.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer