Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION vs DEREK C. FLOYD, 12-002168PL (2012)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 12-002168PL Visitors: 18
Petitioner: CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION
Respondent: DEREK C. FLOYD
Judges: WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
Agency: Department of Law Enforcement
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Jun. 20, 2012
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, November 2, 2012.

Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2013
Summary: The issues in this case are whether the allegations in the Administrative Complaint are correct, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Second arrest of certified law enforcement officer for DUI warrants revocation of certification.
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND ) TRAINING COMMISSION, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. )

)

DEREK C. FLOYD, )

)

Respondent. )


Case No. 12-2168PL

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


On September 18, 2012, an administrative hearing in this case was held by video teleconference in Tampa and Tallahassee, Florida, before William F. Quattlebaum, Administrative Law Judge, Division of Administrative Hearings.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Linton B. Eason, Esquire

Florida Department of Law Enforcement Post Office Box 1489

Tallahassee, Florida 32302 For Respondent: Derek C. Floyd


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES


The issues in this case are whether the allegations in the Administrative Complaint are correct, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.


PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


By an Administrative Complaint dated May 18, 2011, the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission (Petitioner) alleged that Derek C. Floyd (Respondent) failed to maintain "good moral character," a requirement for certification as a law enforcement officer in Florida, by having been twice cited for driving under the influence (DUI). The Respondent disputed the allegation and requested an administrative hearing. The Petitioner forwarded the request to the Division of Administrative Hearings, which scheduled and conducted the proceeding.

At the hearing, the Petitioner presented the testimony of one witness and had one exhibit admitted into evidence. The Respondent presented the testimony of one witness and testified on his own behalf.

A Transcript of the hearing was filed on October 2, 2012.


The Petitioner filed a Proposed Recommended Order that was considered in the preparation of this Recommended Order.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. At all times material to this case, the Respondent was certified as a law enforcement officer by the Petitioner.

  2. On the evening of July 13, 2010, the Respondent was observed driving erratically by Deputy Mark Buswell, an officer of the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office.


  3. After observing the Respondent driving for a distance, Deputy Buswell executed a traffic stop, at which time he smelled the odor of alcohol on the Respondent. In response to Deputy Buswell's inquiry, the Respondent denied having consumed alcohol.

  4. Deputy Buswell asked the Respondent to step out of the truck and observed that the Respondent was unsteady on his feet and swaying. Deputy Buswell then administered a series of sobriety tests to the Respondent. Based on his observations, and his training and experience as a law enforcement officer, Deputy Buswell believed that the Respondent had been driving under the influence of alcohol. Deputy Buswell arrested the Respondent for DUI, a violation of section 316.193, Florida Statutes (2010).1/

  5. After the arrest, Deputy Buswell twice asked the Respondent to submit to a breath alcohol test, and, on both occasions, the Respondent declined to take the test.

  6. The Respondent had previously been arrested for DUI. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

  7. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to and subject matter of this proceeding.

    §§ 120.569 and 120.57, Fla. Stat. (2012).


  8. The Petitioner bears the burden of proving that the Respondent committed the violation alleged in the Administrative Complaint by clear and convincing evidence. Dep't of Banking &


    Fin. v. Osborne Stern & Co., 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1996); Ferris


    v. Turlington, 510 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1987).


  9. Section 943.13(7), Florida Statutes, provides that a law enforcement officer must "have a good moral character" as determined by the Petitioner.

  10. Section 943.1395(7) provides as follows:


    Upon a finding by the commission that a certified officer has not maintained good moral character, the definition of which has been adopted by rule and is established as a statewide standard, as required by

    s. 943.13(7), the commission may enter an order imposing one or more of the following penalties:


    1. Revocation of certification.


    2. Suspension of certification for a period not to exceed 2 years.


    3. Placement on a probationary status for a period not to exceed 2 years, subject to terms and conditions imposed by the commission. Upon the violation of such terms and conditions, the commission may revoke certification or impose additional penalties as enumerated in this subsection.


    4. Successful completion by the officer of any basic recruit, advanced, or career development training or such retraining deemed appropriate by the commission.


    5. Issuance of a reprimand.


  11. In relevant part, Florida Administrative Code Rule 11B- 27.0011(4)(b) defines "failure to maintain good moral character" to include the "perpetration" by a law enforcement officer of an


    act that would constitute a violation of section 316.193, whether or not the violation was prosecuted. Section 316.193 specifically prohibits DUI and sets forth related penalties.

    Accordingly, the Petitioner has established that the Respondent failed to maintain good moral character.

  12. Rule 11B-27.005(5)(b) sets forth the range of penalties applicable to the facts of this case. The Petitioner's recommended penalty of permanent revocation of the Respondent's certification is within the range set forth in the rule.

  13. Because the arrest on July 13, 2010, was the second time the Respondent had been arrested for DUI, the penalty recommended by the Petitioner is appropriate under the facts set

forth herein.


RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that that the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission enter a final order permanently revoking the certification of Derek C. Floyd as a law enforcement officer.


DONE AND ENTERED this 2nd day of November, 2012, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 2nd day of November, 2012.


ENDNOTE


1/ References to Florida Statutes are to the 2010 version, unless otherwise stated.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Linton B. Eason, Esquire

Florida Department of Law Enforcement Post Office Box 1489

Tallahassee, Florida 32302 Derek C. Floyd


Jennifer Cook Pritt, Program Director Division of Criminal Justice

Professionalism Services

Florida Department of Law Enforcement Post Office Box 1489

Tallahassee, Florida 32302-1489


Michael Ramage, General Counsel Florida Department of Law Enforcement Post Office Box 1489

Tallahassee, Florida 32302-1489


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 12-002168PL
Issue Date Proceedings
Jun. 03, 2013 Agency Final Order filed.
Nov. 02, 2012 Recommended Order (hearing held September 18, 2012). CASE CLOSED.
Nov. 02, 2012 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Oct. 10, 2012 Petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Oct. 02, 2012 Transcript (not available for viewing) filed.
Sep. 18, 2012 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Aug. 30, 2012 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Aug. 30, 2012 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for September 18, 2012; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa and Tallahassee, FL).
Aug. 22, 2012 Notice of Available Dates for Hearing filed.
Aug. 06, 2012 Order to Submit New Hearing Dates.
Jul. 31, 2012 Letter to DOAH from D. Floyd requesting to dispute the allegations and request a hearing filed.
Jul. 18, 2012 Order Granting Motion to Withdraw, Canceling Hearing, and Requiring Response from Respondent (parties to advise status by August 1, 2012).
Jul. 18, 2012 CASE STATUS: Motion Hearing Held.
Jul. 18, 2012 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel filed.
Jul. 18, 2012 Respondent's Emergency Motion for Continuance filed.
Jul. 16, 2012 Notice of Transfer.
Jul. 09, 2012 Petitioner's Proposed Exhibits (exhibits not available for viewing)
Jul. 05, 2012 Petitioner's Notice of Filing filed.
Jun. 29, 2012 Amended Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for July 20, 2012; 9:00 a.m.; Tampa and Tallahassee, FL; amended as to hearing date and video teleconference).
Jun. 28, 2012 Motion to Allow Remote Video Teleconference Hearing filed.
Jun. 28, 2012 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Jun. 28, 2012 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for July 16, 2012; 9:00 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
Jun. 20, 2012 Initial Order.
Jun. 20, 2012 Agency referral filed.
Jun. 20, 2012 Election of Rights filed.
Jun. 20, 2012 Administrative Complaint filed.

Orders for Case No: 12-002168PL
Issue Date Document Summary
May 24, 2013 Agency Final Order
Nov. 02, 2012 Recommended Order Second arrest of certified law enforcement officer for DUI warrants revocation of certification.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer