Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY vs SEAN A. WARD, 17-004231 (2017)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 17-004231 Visitors: 40
Petitioner: EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY
Respondent: SEAN A. WARD
Judges: G. W. CHISENHALL
Agency: Contract Hearings
Locations: Pensacola, Florida
Filed: Jul. 25, 2017
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, September 28, 2017.

Latest Update: Oct. 20, 2017
Summary: Whether Respondent committed the violations of Emerald Coast Utility Authority’s Human Resources Manual as alleged in the agency action letter dated July 17, 2017.Because Respondent withdrew his hearing request at the outset of the final hearing, Petitioner no longer has to prove its allegations.
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY,


Petitioner,


vs.


SEAN A. WARD,


Respondent.

/

Case No. 17-4231


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, this case was heard on September 21, 2017, in Pensacola, Florida, before Garnett W. Chisenhall, a designated Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings (“DOAH”).

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Diane Marie Longoria, Esquire

Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A.

114 East Gregory Street Pensacola, Florida 32502


For Respondent: James Sylivan Owens, Esquire

5240 Willing Street

Milton, Florida 32570 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES

Whether Respondent committed the violations of Emerald Coast Utility Authority’s Human Resources Manual as alleged in the agency action letter dated July 17, 2017.


PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


Via a letter dated July 17, 2017, Emerald Coast Utilities Authority (“ECUA”) notified Sean Ward of its intent to terminate his employment with ECUA. ECUA’s action was motivated by a determination that Mr. Ward had violated the following provisions of ECUA’s Human Resources Manual: Section B-13 A (4) (conduct unbecoming an ECUA employee), Section B-13 A (13) (falsification of records), Section B-13 A (18)(loafing), Section B-13 A (26)(substandard quality or quantity of work), and Section B-13 A (33)(violation of ECUA rules or guidelines or state or federal law).

Mr. Ward timely filed a request for a hearing to challenge ECUA’s intended action. In accordance with the terms of the “Administrative Law Judge Services Contract” (“the Contract”), entered into between ECUA and DOAH, ECUA forwarded the hearing request to DOAH.

On August 16, 2017, the undersigned issued a Notice of Hearing scheduling the final hearing to occur on September 20, 2017, in Pensacola, Florida, on the campus of ECUA.

On August 18, 2017, counsel for ECUA filed an “Agreed Motion for Continuance” notifying the undersigned that a conflict arose with regard to the room in which the final hearing was to be held. Accordingly, the undersigned issued an


Amended Notice of Hearing scheduling the final hearing to occur on September 21, 2017.

The final hearing took place as scheduled on September 21, 2017. Neither party called any witnesses or attempted to move any exhibits into evidence.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. At the outset of the hearing, Mr. Ward’s attorney announced that Mr. Ward no longer wished to challenge ECUA’s intent to terminate his employment. In other words, Mr. Ward withdrew his request for a hearing.

  2. Furthermore, Mr. Ward made a statement consistent with his attorney’s announcement.

  3. The undersigned finds that Mr. Ward’s decision to withdraw his hearing request was voluntarily made and uncoerced.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  4. DOAH has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of these proceedings pursuant to sections 120.65(6) and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes (2017).1/

  5. As the party asserting the affirmative of a factual issue, ECUA has the burden of proof in this case to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that Mr. Ward engaged in the violations alleged in the letter dated July 17, 2017. See Balino v. Dep’t of HRS, 348 So. 2d 349, 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).2/


  6. Because Mr. Ward has withdrawn his hearing request, ECUA no longer has to satisfy any burden of proof in order to follow through with its intent to terminate Mr. Ward’s

employment.


RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Executive Director of Emerald Coast Utilities Authority find that Mr. Ward violated

Section B-13 A (4)(conduct unbecoming an ECUA employee), Section B-13 A (13)(falsification of records), Section B-13 A (18) (loafing), Section B-13 A (26)(substandard quality or quantity of work), and Section B-13 A (33)(violation of ECUA rules or guidelines or state or federal law) of the ECUA’s Human Resources Manual.3/

DONE AND ENTERED this 28th day of September, 2017, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

G. W. CHISENHALL Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 28th day of September, 2017.


ENDNOTES


1/ Section 120.65(6) provides that DOAH “is authorized to provide administrative law judges on a contract basis to any governmental entity to conduct any hearing not covered by this section.”


2/ The Contract specifies that “ECUA has the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.”


3/ The Contract further specifies that “the ALJ will determine whether the employee has committed the violation as charged, but the ALJ will not comment on, or recommend, any disciplinary penalty.”


COPIES FURNISHED:


Diane Marie Longoria, Esquire Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A.

114 East Gregory Street Pensacola, Florida 32502 (eServed)


James Sylivan Owens, Esquire 5240 Willing Street

Milton, Florida 32570 (eServed)


Steve Sorrell, Executive Director Emerald Coast Utilities Authority 9255 Sturdevant Street

Pensacola, Florida 32514


Cynthia Sutherland, Director

Human Resources and Administrative Services Emerald Coast Utilities Authority

9255 Sturdevant Street

Pensacola, Florida 32514


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT WRITTEN ARGUMENT


Pursuant to paragraph 7(m) of the contract between ECUA and DOAH, all parties have the right to submit written argument within 10 days of the issuance of this Recommended Order with the Executive Director of the ECUA as to any appropriate penalty to be imposed. The Executive Director will then determine the appropriate level of discipline to be imposed upon the Respondent.


Docket for Case No: 17-004231
Issue Date Proceedings
Oct. 20, 2017 Agency Final Order filed.
Sep. 28, 2017 Recommended Order (hearing held September 21, 2017). CASE CLOSED.
Sep. 28, 2017 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Sep. 21, 2017 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Sep. 21, 2017 Return of Service filed.
Aug. 21, 2017 Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for September 21, 2017; 9:00 a.m., Central Time; Pensacola, FL; amended as to Date).
Aug. 18, 2017 Agreed Motion for Continuance filed.
Aug. 16, 2017 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for September 20, 2017; 9:00 a.m., Central Time; Pensacola, FL).
Aug. 11, 2017 Fax Containing Dates of Availability filed.
Jul. 31, 2017 Order Requesting Dates of Availability.
Jul. 25, 2017 Agency action letter filed.
Jul. 25, 2017 Request for Administrative Hearing filed.
Jul. 25, 2017 Agency referral filed.

Orders for Case No: 17-004231
Issue Date Document Summary
Oct. 17, 2017 Agency Final Order
Sep. 28, 2017 Recommended Order Because Respondent withdrew his hearing request at the outset of the final hearing, Petitioner no longer has to prove its allegations.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer