1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 5">*5 Decision will be entered under Rule 155.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THORNTON, JUDGE: By separate notices of deficiency, respondent determined the following deficiencies and penalties with respect to petitioner husband's 1993 Federal income taxes and petitioners' joint 1994 and 1995 Federal income taxes:
Accuracy-Related | ||
Years | Deficiency | Penalty Sec. 6662 |
1993 | $ 6,412 | $ 1,282 |
1994 | 9,140 | 1,828 |
1995 | 4,420 | 884 |
1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 5">*6 All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect in the years in issue. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. All dollar amounts are rounded.
Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found and incorporated by this reference.
At the time the petition was filed, petitioners were married and living in Hueytown, Alabama.
During the years at issue, petitioner husband operated a business known as Pro TV & VCR Repair. In 1993, petitioner husband filed a Federal income tax return with a filing status of single.
In 1994, petitioners were married. During the years at issue, petitioner wife was employed at the Alabama Power Co. In 1994 and 1995, petitioners filed joint Federal income tax returns.
Petitioner husband's tax return for 1993, and petitioners' joint tax returns for 1994 and 1995, reported income as follows:
Amount of | ||
Year | Source of Income | Income Reported |
1993 | Schedule C income | $ 716 |
Interest income | 20 | |
1994 | Wages | 29,097 |
Dividend income | 1343 | |
Schedule C income | 670 | |
1995 | Wages | 38,433 |
Interest | 29 | |
Dividends | 141 | |
Schedule C loss | (3,534) |
In 1993, petitioner husband purchased a house, which1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 5">*7 he sold in 1994, resulting in a capital gain of $ 2,340.
Respondent determined that for taxable year 1993 petitioner husband had unreported income in the amount of $ 28,933, and that for taxable years 1994 and 1995, petitioners had unreported income of $ 31,607, and $ 17,828, respectively. Respondent also determined that petitioners had unreported capital gain of $ 2,340 in taxable year 1994.
In their petition, petitioners alleged that they did not engage in any taxable activities during the years at issue.
DISCUSSION
Generally, the Commissioner's determinations are presumed correct, and the taxpayer bears the burden of proving that those determinations are erroneous. Rule 142(a);
1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 5">*8 Respondent used the cash expenditures method to reconstruct petitioners' income. This method is based on the assumption that, absent some explanation by the taxpayer, the excess of a taxpayer's expenditures over reported income in a taxable year constitutes taxable income.
Petitioners have stipulated copies of bank records disclosing deposits and disbursements from their bank accounts and schedules prepared by respondent summarizing all of the transactions, deposits, and disbursements. For each of the years in issue, these documents show that petitioners made substantial expenditures in excess of amounts reported as income on their Federal income tax returns. Our review of the record indicates that respondent complied with the requirements set forth in
Petitioners bear the burden 1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 5">*9 of showing that respondent's application of the cash expenditures method was unfair or inaccurate. See
Petitioners' arguments are without merit and have long been rejected. In
See also
Petitioners have stipulated that the sale in 1994 of the house that petitioner husband purchased in 1993 resulted in capital gain of $ 2,340. We conclude that this capital gain constitutes taxable income. Respondent's determination on this issue is sustained.
Respondent determined that petitioners are liable for accuracy-related penalties pursuant to
1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 5">*11
The Tax Court is authorized under
To reflect the foregoing and a concession by the respondent,
Decision will be entered under Rule 155.
1. In the notices of deficiency for each of the years at issue, respondent determined that petitioners were liable for civil fraud penalties pursuant to sec. 6663, or in the alternative, accuracy- related penalties pursuant to