Findings Of Fact On November 1, 1983, Petitioner submitted Household Application for Home Energy Assistance on which he listed as income VA benefits in the amount of $118 per month; unemployment compensation of $597.12 per month; and cash from his family of $300-$400 per month. Petitioner is a one-member household. He was involved in a motorcycle accident in May, 1983, and has been unable to return to his job at Martin Marietta since that time. He received benefits of $160 per week from Martin Marietta's insurer from date of his accident until January 6, 1984, when his benefits were reduced to $80 per week because of his possible entitlement to Social Security disability benefits. Payments were suspended on January 13, 1984, pending Petitioner's submission to the insurance carrier a statement of continuing total disability (Exhibit 1). Petitioner acknowledged on the witness stand that he receives VA disability compensation which is mailed to his bank monthly; however, he testified he has authorized the diversion of those funds to pay debts he owes, so that money is not available to him for daily living expenses. The maximum monthly income a one-member household can receive and be eligible for home energy assistance is $405 (Exhibit 3).
The Issue Whether Petitioner is eligible for additional low income energy assistance under Section 409.508, Florida Statutes (1980), Home Energy Assistance Program; Rule 10 CER 80-11, Low Income Energy Assistance Program, amended by Rule 10 CER 81-4, Florida Administrative Code.
Findings Of Fact Petitioner Muriel M. Elliott requested a hearing by a complaint received in the office of Respondent on March 27, 1981. After the required informal conference with a supervisor in Respondent Department Petitioner requested a formal hearing. In January of 198 Elliott, a white female, filed a Household Application for low income energy assistance. No one in her household is a migrant or migrant farm worker, and no one else applied for the low income energy assistance. She lives with one other person, receives food stamps and receives a bill for the use of natural gas for heating purposes. Petitioner was issued a check in the amount of $136.00 to assist her in paying her heating costs for the month of January. The action was taken by Respondent within 45 days of Petitioner's application, and she was promptly sent low income energy assistance benefits. Petitioner Elliott did not dispute the evidence submitted by Respondent but requested a hearing with the hope that additional benefits might be granted inasmuch as her income is only 5259.90 per month. Respondent's witness produced the signed application of Petitioner, a map of the State of Florida depicting four (4) climatic regions and a chart for determining the amount of low income energy assistance based on monthly income of the applicant and the type of fuel used for both fully vulnerable and partially vulnerable households. The amount of $136.00 was the correct amount according to the chart under the facts provided by Petitioner.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the Hearing Officer recommends that a final order be entered approving the amount of low income energy assistance benefits allocated to Petitioner Muriel M. Elliott. DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of June, 1981, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 11th day of June, 1981. COPIES FURNISHED: Ms. Muriel M. Elliott 505 West Leon Street Perry, Florida 32347 John L. Pearce, Esquire Department of HRS 2639 North Monroe Street, Suite 200-A Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Alvin J. Taylor, Secretary Attn: Susan B. Kirkland, Esquire Department of HRS Building One, Room 406 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301
The Issue Whether Petitioner is eligible for low income energy assistance as provided in section 409.508, Florida Statutes (1980), Home Energy Assistance Program; Rules 10 CER 81-5 through 81-13, Low Income Energy Assistance Program, amended by Rules 10 CER 81-16 and 81-17, Florida Administrative Code.
Findings Of Fact Petitioner John Banyas requested a hearing by a letter received in the office of Respondent on July 21, 1981. After the required informal conference with a supervisor in the Respondent Department Petitioner requested a formal hearing. On June 19, 1981 Banyas, a white male, filed a Household Application for low income energy assistance with the required Medical Certification for Cooling. He lives alone and receives food stamps, and is not a migrant or migrant farm worker. By Notice of Application Denial mailed June 22, 1981 Petitioner was informed that he was denied assistance for the reason that his monthly household income exceeded the maximum income limits for a household of his size. The action was taken by Respondent within 45 days of Petitioner's application, and he was promptly notified of the reason for denial of benefits. Petitioner did not dispute the evidence presented by Respondent Department but felt that assistance should have been based on need. Petitioner Banyas' monthly household income during the month of his application was $333.30.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the Hearing Officer recommends that a final order be entered denying benefits to petitioner. DONE and ORDERED this 18th day of September, 1981, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 18th day of September, 1981. COPIES FURNISHED: MR. JOHN BANYAS ROUTE 2, BOX 2268 PALATKA, FLORIDA 32077 JOSEPH E. HODGES, ESQUIRE DEPARTMENT OF HRS 2002 NORTHWEST 13TH STREET OAK PARK EXECUTIVE SQUARE GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32601 ALVIN J. TAYLOR, SECRETARY ATTN: SUSAN B. KIRKLAND, ESQUIRE DEPARTMENT OF HRS BUILDING ONE, ROOM 406 1323 WINEWOOD BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301
The Issue Whether Petitioner is eligible for low income energy assistance as provided in Section 409.508, Florida Statutes (1980), Home Energy Assistance Program; Rules 10 CER 81-5 through 81-13, Low Income Energy Assistance Program, amended by Rules 10 CER 81-16 and 81-17, Florida Administrative Code.
Findings Of Fact Petitioner Ethel C. Armstrong requested a formal hearing after the required informal conference with a supervisor employed by Respondent Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. On June 27, 1981 Armstrong, a seventy-seven (77) year old woman who lives alone, filed a Household Application for low income energy assistance with the required Medical Certification for Cooling. By Notice of Application Denial Petitioner was informed the she was denied assistance for the reason that her monthly household income exceeded the maximum income limits for a household of her size. The action was taken within 45 days of Petitioner's application, and she was promptly notified of the reason for denial of benefits. Petitioner did not dispute the evidence presented by Respondent Department but felt that assistance should have been based on need. Armstrong's monthly household income during the month of her application was at least $322.30.
Recommendation Based on the for going Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law the Hearing Officer recommends that a final order be entered by the Respondent Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services denying low income energy benefits to Petitioner. DONE and ORDERED this 15th day of December, 1981, in Tallahassee, Florida. DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 15th day of December, 1981. COPIES FURNISHED: Ms. Ethel C. Armstrong 2207 Olney Road Lakeland, Florida 33801 Anthony N. DeLuccia, Jr., Esquire Department of HRS 8800 Cleveland Avenue, South Post Office Box 06085 Fort Myers, Florida 33907 David H. Pingree, Secretary Attn: Susan B. Kirkland, Esquire Department of HRS Building one, Room 406 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301
The Issue Whether Petitioner was properly denied home energy assistance as requested.
Findings Of Fact Petitioner is an 84-year-old unemployed homemaker whose entire and total income is a monthly Social Security payment of $300.04 and, periodically, when certain real property she owns is rented, a monthly rental check of $87.50. On December 23, 1982, because the property had not been rented for several months, Petitioner filled out and submitted a "Household Application for Home Energy Assistance" form at the Ocala, Florida, office of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS). On this form, she listed, inter alia, her household makeup (she, alone), her Social Security number, and the amount of income she had each month, including the usual rent which she was not getting at the time. On January 13, 1983, HRS sent Mrs. Roberson a form letter requesting further information. This information requested was the award letter from Social Security, telling the amount she was getting each month, and something telling the rent she received, signed by the tenant. She was to provide this information before January 27, 1983. Apparently, Petitioner did not understand the request, and no one from HRS contacted her other than by this form letter. Sometime thereafter, Petitioner went into the HRS office and filled out another application form thinking that was the information requested. No action was taken on the second application. In any event, the requested information was not submitted and, as a result, the application was denied. Petitioner's family size and income would qualify her for assistance had her response to the request for additional information been timely. All during the time the Low Income Energy Assistance Program was in operation in Ocala, HRS had at least 6 or 7 staff members in the office to help individuals fill out their application forms and to answer questions posed by applicants.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is hereby RECOMMENDED: That the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services deny Petitioner's application for low income energy assistance benefits. RECOMMENDED this 2nd day of June, 1983, in Tallahassee, Florida. ARNOLD H. POLLOCK Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 2nd day of June, 1983. COPIES FURNISHED: Emily Roberson 2277 N. W. 12th Street Ocala, Florida 32675 James Sawyer, Esquire District Counsel Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 2002 N.W. 13th Street Gainesville, Florida 32601 Mr. David Pingree Secretary Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Findings Of Fact The Petitioner Farm Workers Rights Organization is an educational and charitable nonprofit corporation which has been organized under the provisions of Chapter 617, Florida Statutes. The purposes of the organization as provided in its Articles of Incorporation are as follows: To raise the economic, educational, and social levels of migrant and seasonal farm workers . . . who are seasonally unemployed, underemployed, or whose income is below federal poverty guidelines and to foster and promote community wide interest and concern for the problems of said farm workers to the end that (a) educational and economic opportunities may be expanded; (b) sickness, poverty, crime, and environmental degradation may be lessened; and (c) racial tensions, prejudice, and discrimination, economic and otherwise, may be eliminated. The organization is authorized under its Articles of Incorporation to do all lawful activities for the furtherance of its purposes. The Farm Workers Rights Organization is an active organization which has more than one thousand members. About three thousand persons are loosely associated with the organization. Many members of the organization reside in or around Immokalee, Florida, but members come from all over the state. Approximately ninety percent of the members are nonwhite, and most earn low or irregular incomes. Health problems are both a symptom and a cause of many of the problems that migrant farm workers face. The Farm Workers Rights Organization is active in promoting improved health care services for its members. The organization has actively opposed the issuance of Certificates of Need by the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services to health care providers which the organization contends do not adequately address the health care needs of poor and minority persons. A substantial number of the organization's members have experienced difficulty in obtaining access to needed health care services. The Petitioner Carmen Torres is a member of the Farm Workers Rights Organization. She is a low income person of Hispanic background who resides near Immokalee, Florida. She participates in the Medicaid Program. She has experienced some difficulty in obtaining adequate medical assistance for illnesses that she has suffered because many physicians and health care facilities do not accept Medicaid patients. Petitioner would like to have better access to hospital facilities such as those at Lehigh General Hospital. She has never applied for services at Lehigh General Hospital. Friends have advised her that Lehigh General Hospital would not accept her as a patient. No competent evidence was offered as to the identity or status of the other persons who are named as Petitioners in this proceeding. The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services is responsible for administering Florida's Certificate of Need program under the provisions of Section 381.494, Florida Statutes. The Department is Florida's state health planning and development agency designated pursuant to the provisions of federal law. 42 U.S.C. s3000M. The Department has adopted rules setting criteria to apply to applications for Certificates of Need. These criteria are set out in Rule 10- 5.11, Florida Administrative Code. The rule does not specifically require that the Department consider the extent to which an applicant's proposed service would meet the needs of low income or minority persons, neither does the rule deem those needs irrelevant. Rule 10- 5.11(3) provides that the Department will evaluate "the need that the population served or to be served has for such pro posed health or hospice services." Rule 10-5.12(8) provides for hearing procedures to be conducted by the Division of Administrative Hearings under the provisions of Chapter 120, Florida Statutes. The rule provides at Paragraph (8): The only decisions of the Department which may be reversed or revised by the Hearing Officer are decisions as to the consistency or inconsistency of the application with standards, criteria, and plans described in Rule 10-5.11 herein. Rules that have been adopted by the United States Department of Health and Human Services under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. s3000M provide that state Certificate of Need review agencies consider the degree to which medically underserved persons have access to services under review. See: 42 C.F.R ss123.409(a), 123.412(a), and 123.413. States are required to administer their programs in harmony with the rules of the federal agency. Failure to do so can cause a state to lose federal funding assistance. The Department's rules do not have the effect of removing consideration of how a proposed medical facility or service would impact the needs of low income or minority persons. The Department has obtained input regarding such needs in Certificate of Need proceedings and has considered them. There have been proceedings in which the Department has not specifically addressed the needs of low income and minority persons. The Petitioners have had a special interest in a Certificate of Need application that was filed with the Department by Lehigh General Hospital. Lehigh General Hospital is seeking to build a new hospital facility which would completely replace a present facility. The Department determined in that matter that the application would not impact minority or low income persons because the same basic services would be provided at the new facility as had been provided at the old facility. The service area of Lehigh General Hospital includes the area around Immokalee, Florida. The Department has approved Lehigh General Hospital's Certificate of Need application. The Petitioner Farm Workers Rights Organization is now pursuing judicial action to set aside the approval of that application. It appears that the Department has failed to specifically address the needs of low income and minority persons in other Certificate of Need proceedings. It does not appear, however, that the Department has any policy of not addressing those needs.
Recommendation It is recommended that a final order be entered fining Henry Haywood $1,500 for these violations of Section 289.129(1)(m), Florida Statutes. DONE AND ENTERED in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida, this 16th day of September, 1988. WILLIAM R. DORSEY, JR. Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 16th day of September, 1988. COPIES FURNISHED: Michael Cohen, Esquire 517 Southwest First Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Mr. Henry L. Haywood 611 Northeast 39th Street Pompano Beach, Florida 33064 Fred Seely, Executive Director Department of Professional Regulation Construction Industry Licensing Board Post Office Box 2 Jacksonville, Florida 32201 Bruce D. Lamb, Esquire Department of Professional Regulation 130 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0750 Courtesy copy to: Mr. Steve Deinma AAA Insulation 1900 Australian Avenue Rivera Beach, Florida 33404
The Issue Whether Petitioner committed the violations alleged in the citations he received on February 6, 1997. If so, what amount, if any, should he be fined.
Findings Of Fact Based upon the evidence adduced at hearing and the record as a whole, the following Findings of Fact are made: At all times material to the instant case, Petitioner owned and operated two apartment buildings located (adjacent to each other) at 732 and 740 Joe Louis Avenue in Pahokee, Florida (hereinafter referred to as the 732 Apartments and the 740 Apartments, respectively). Each building contained ten apartments used to house migrant farmworkers and members of their families, including their children. Among Petitioner's tenants was Speedy Martin. Petitioner paid Martin to help him maintain the buildings and grounds. Michael Menor is a Sanitation and Safety Specialist with the Department. He is assigned to the Department's Belle Glade office. In his capacity as a Sanitation and Safety Specialist, he inspects migrant farmworker housing to ascertain whether there is compliance with applicable statutory and rule requirements. Menor conducted inspections of the 732 and 740 Apartments on January 14, 1997. The inspections revealed the existence of violations at both locations. Following his inspections, Menor prepared inspection reports which accurately described the violations that existed at the two locations at the time of the inspections and which gave notice that these violations needed to be corrected by 8:00 a.m. on January 28, 1997. Before leaving, he handed these inspection reports to one of Petitioner's tenants, Marlo Camble. Approximately a week later, Camble provided the reports to Speedy Martin, who, in turn, notified Petitioner of the contents of the reports. The inspection report describing the condition of the 732 Apartments and grounds at the time of the January 14, 1997, inspection contained the following "comments and instructions": Repair cracks in building, south side. Replace 11 bathroom screens missing from building. Broken window [in] Apt. # 5 and two broken windows [in] Apt. 4. Repair or replace covers for water meters. Clean out garbage, litter and debris from east side of b[ui]ld[ing]. Replace missing screens [in] Apt[s]. #1 [and] 2. Provide or repair heat [in] Apt. #2. Exposed wires [hanging from two] public lighting . . . fixtures [on] west side of b[ui]lding. Exposed wires in meter room. Empty out storage area and repair door under stairs. Repair wall on side of storage area. Repair public lighting on 2nd floor. Repair or replace stove [in] Apt. #9. Repair or replace stove [in] Apt. #2. Note: Smoke detectors missing [from] Apt. #8. Fire extinguisher missing [from] Apt. #2. All fire extinguishers require reinspection and retag. The inspection report describing the condition of the 740 Apartments and grounds at the time of the January 14, 1997, inspection contained the following "comments and instructions": Replace missing screens in Apt[s]. #4 and #5. Repair leak on overhang, [in] front of Apt[s]. #4 and #5. Clean out garbage, litter and debris from east side of building. Repair heater [in] Apt. #4. Repair broken windows [in] Apt. #4. (2 windows broken). Remove or repair screen door [on] Apt. #3. Repair public lighting. Repair screen [in] Apt. #1. Exposed electrical wires [in] front of Apt. #1. Repair door frame and screen in meter room. Clean room. Provide cover for electrical wires in meter room. Repair overhang [on] corner of b[ui]ld[ing's] west side. Remove wooden poles [on] south side of building. Repair broken window [in] Apt. #3 [on] south side of building. Repair wall [on] south side of building. Provide covers for water meters. Replace 2 missing bathroom screens [on] south side of building. Repair public lighting [on] 2nd floor. Replace missing screen [in] Apt. #7. Repair 2 broken windows [in] Apt. #6. Exposed wire [on] west side of Apt. #6. Repair storage door under stairs and clean storage room. Note: All fire extinguishers require retag and reinspection. Replace fire extinguisher and smoke detector [in] Apt. #2. Menor returned to the 732 and 740 Apartments on January 31, 1997, to conduct follow-up inspections.1 The follow- up inspections revealed that, although Petitioner had remedied some of the problems that Menor had discovered during his January 14, 1997, inspections (and had noted in his reports of those inspections), most of the violations found during these earlier inspections had not been corrected. Following his January 31, 1997, inspections, Menor prepared inspection reports which accurately described the violations that existed at the two locations at the time of the inspections and which gave notice that these violations needed to be corrected by 8:00 a.m. on February 4, 1997. Menor, on February 3, 1997, "faxed" Petitioner copies of the inspection reports. He also spoke with Petitioner and advised him of the contents of the reports. The inspection report describing the condition of the 732 Apartments and grounds at the time of the January 31, 1997, inspection contained the following "comments and instructions": Repair cracks in building, south side. Replace 11 bathroom screens missing from building. Broken window [in] Apt. #5 and two broken windows [in] Apt. #4. Repair or replace covers for water meters. Clean out garbage, litter and debris [from] east side of building. Replace missing screens [in] Apt[s]. #1 [and] 2. Provide or repair heat [in] Apt. #2. Repair door to storage area under stairs. Repair or replace stove [in] Apt. #9. Repair or replace stove [in] Apt. #2. Provide effective extermination of rodents. The inspection report describing the condition of the 740 Apartments and grounds at the time of the January 31, 1997, inspection contained the following "comments and instructions": Replace missing screens in Apt[s]. #4 [and] #5. Repair leak on overhang, [in] front of Apt[s]. #4 [and] #5. Clean out garbage, litter and debris from east side of b[ui]ld[ing]. Repair 2 heaters [in] Apt. #4. Repair overhang [on] corner of building['s] west side. Repair broken window [in] Apt. #3 [on] south side of building. Repair wall [on] south side of building. Provide covers for water meters. Replace 2 missing bathroom screens [on] south side of b[ui]ld[ing]. Repair public lighting [on] south side of b[ui]ld[ing]. Repair broken window (2)[in] Apt. #6. Repair storage door und[er] stairs. Provide effective extermination of rodents. Menor next inspected the 732 and 740 Apartments on February 4, 1997. The inspections revealed that none of the violations that Menor had discovered during his January 31, 1997, inspections (and had noted in his reports of those inspections) had been remedied, with the exception of the violation resulting from the broken heater in Apartment number 2 in the 732 Apartments, which had been repaired since the January 31, 1997, inspections. (One of the heaters in Apartment number 9 in the 732 Apartments, however, was now in disrepair.) Although Petitioner had taken steps to address some of these continuing violations, his efforts, as Menor's February 4, 1997, inspections revealed, were inadequate to correct the targeted problems. Petitioner had ordered meter covers from the City of Pahokee, but he had not yet received them nor had he placed any temporary coverings over the uncovered meters. He had attempted to repair the cracks in the building on the south side of the 732 Apartments; the door to the storage area under the stairs in the 732 Apartments; the overhang in front of Apartment numbers 4 and 5 in the 740 Apartments; the overhang on the west side of the 740 Apartments; the wall on the south side of the 740 Apartments; and the door to the storage area under the stairs in the 740 Apartments; but the repairs he had made had not been done properly. He had put rat poison under the buildings and given tenants rat traps in an effort to alleviate the rodent infestation problem at the 732 and 740 Apartments; however, he had not gone to the expense of hiring a professional exterminator to deal with the problem, even though it should have been apparent to him that the services of an exterminator were needed to effectively eliminate the rat population at the two locations. Following the February 4, 1997, inspections, Menor prepared inspection reports which accurately described the violations that existed at the 732 and 740 Apartments at the time of the inspections and which gave notice that these violations needed to be corrected by 8:00 a.m. on February 6, 1997. Menor spoke with Petitioner and advised Petitioner of the contents of the inspection reports and what Petitioner needed to do to remedy the violations noted in the reports. Menor returned to inspect the 732 and 740 Apartments on February 6, 1997. Upon his arrival, Menor met Petitioner, who had also just arrived on the scene. In Petitioner's car were screens and light bulbs that Petitioner intended to install in the apartments and public areas that needed them. Notwithstanding Petitioner's intentions, none of the violations that Menor had discovered during his February 4, 1997, inspections (and had noted in his reports of those inspections) had yet been remedied. Inasmuch as the deadline that Menor had given Petitioner to correct these violations had passed, Menor issued Petitioner two citations, one for the continuing violations at the 732 Apartments and the other for the continuing violations at the 740 Apartments. Each citation directed Petitioner "to pay a fine in the amount of $500.00," but provided that Petitioner could "have the amount of the fine . . . reduced or waived completely by demonstrating good faith in correcting the violations or by presenting 'before and after' evidence to the Palm Beach County Public Health Unit within 48 hours of the time of the issuance of th[e] citation." Menor told Petitioner that he would be back to the apartments on Monday, February 10, 1997, to see if the violations had been corrected and if a reduction or waiver of the fines was warranted. On February 10, 1997, Petitioner telephoned Menor and advised him that he needed an extra day to bring the 732 and 740 Apartments into compliance. Menor responded by telling Petitioner that he would postpone his inspections of the apartments until the following day. The following day, February 11, 1997, Menor paid a return visit to the 732 and 740 Apartments to conduct post- citation inspections. Some of the continuing violations that Menor had discovered during his February 4, 1997, inspections (and had noted in his reports of those inspections) had still not yet been remedied. These unremedied violations created conditions that posed a serious threat to the health and safety of the tenants. Following his February 11, 1997, inspections, Menor prepared inspection reports which accurately described the violations that existed at the two locations at the time of the inspections and which gave notice that these violations needed to be corrected by 8:00 a.m. on February 17, 1997. Menor provided Petitioner, who was present during the inspections, copies of the inspection reports. The inspection report describing the condition of the 732 Apartments and grounds at the time of the February 11, 1997, inspection contained the following "comments and instructions": Replace covers for water meters. . . . Repair door to storage area. Provide effective extermination of rodents. Repair cracks in building, south side. Screens missing from bathroom window[s]. The inspection report describing the condition of the 740 Apartments and grounds at the time of the February 11, 1997, inspection contained the following "comments and instructions": Repair overhang [on] corner of building['s] west side./Repair storage door. Provide covers for water meters. Repair 2 broken windows [in] Apt. #6. Provide effective extermination of rodents. Menor next inspected the 732 and 740 Apartments on February 17, 1997. The inspections revealed that at neither location had Petitioner yet "provide[d] covers for water meters" or "provide[d] effective extermination of rodents," although he had corrected the other violations Menor had discovered during his February 11, 1997, inspections (and had noted in his reports of those inspections). Following his February 17, 1997, inspections, Menor prepared inspection reports which accurately described the violations that existed at the two locations at the time of the inspections. Copies of these inspection reports were "faxed" to Petitioner on February 18, 1997. On February 24, 1997, Menor received a complaint from a tenant living in Apartment number 4 in the 740 Apartments that there were "rats in [her] refrigerator." Later that day, Menor went to the 740 Apartments to investigate the complaint. His investigation revealed evidence that rats had entered the complainant's refrigerator through a hole. Menor spoke with Petitioner following his investigation and emphasized the importance of Petitioner providing his tenants with effective "pest control." Two days later, on February 26, 1997, Petitioner telephoned Menor and told Menor that he (Petitioner) had made arrangements for a "pest control" company, Glades Pest Control, to provide extermination services at the 732 and 740 Apartments, but that it would not be until March 4, 1997, that such services would be rendered. On April 18, 1997, Menor returned to the 732 and 740 Apartments to ascertain whether the continuing violations that he had discovered during his February 17, 1997, inspections (and had noted in his reports of those inspections) had been remedied. The inspections revealed that these violations had been corrected.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Department issue a final order finding Respondent guilty of the violations alleged in the February 6, 1997, citations and fining him a total of $1,000.00 ($500.00 per citation) for these violations. DONE AND ENTERED this 13th day of August, 1997, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. STUART M. LERNER Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060 (904) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675 Fax Filing (904) 921-6847 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 13th day of August, 1997.
Findings Of Fact On April 16, 1982, Petitioner, Angela V. Santana, mailed a household application for energy assistance under the Low Income Energy Assistance Program to Respondent, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. When she had received no reply for two months, Petitioner's daughter visited the offices of Respondent and was told it had no record of her application being filed. She was also told to request an administrative hearing if she wished to contest the matter. That advice prompted the instant hearing. Thereafter, on June 17, 1982, Petitioner refiled her application and simultaneously requested a hearing. Her second application was later denied on the ground it was received after the program had closed. The Department processed approximately 8,000 applications at its Tampa District Office between March 15 and April 23, 1982. When the complaint of Santana was received, it reviewed computer forms and printouts, a card catalog system, application log and application log-in sheets in an attempt to locate her application. However, it had no record of Santana's application being filed. The Department was not aware of any other complaints concerning lost or misplaced applications. It has no procedures for allowing persons to refile applications that fall within this category unless they are timely filed. Petitioner initiated a trace of her letter with the United States Post Office on June 25, 1982. The Post Office was unable to locate the letter. The application originally mailed on April 16 and refiled on June 16 included a copy of Petitioner's April, 1982 social security check. Since the check was deposited in April, Petitioner necessarily had to photocopy the check that month in order to retain a copy for her records. This corroborates her claim that an application was indeed mailed in April. The instructions given to applicants advises them that "[i]f (they) have not received a notice of denial or approval by June 17, 1982, (they) should notify th(e) office immediately." However, if an applicant waited until June 17 to contact the Department, the time for filing a second application would have expired. Petitioner lives in her household with one other person. Her monthly countable income is approximately $348 which falls within the income limitations for households having two persons. Therefore, she is qualified to receive assistance.
Recommendation Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is RECOMMENDED that the application of Angela V. Santana for energy assistance be GRANTED. DONE and ENTERED this 29th day of July, 1982, in Tallahassee, Florida. COPIES FURNISHED: Ms. Angela V. Santana 107 West Woodlawn Avenue Tampa, Florida 33603 DONALD R. ALEXANDER Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 29th day of July, 1982. Janice Sortor, Esquire Department of HRS 4000 West Buffalo Avenue, 5th Floor Tampa, Florida 33614
Findings Of Fact Petitioner, Ann Anderson, requested a hearing by a letter dated April 24, 1981. After the required informal conference with a supervisor in the Respondent Department, Petitioner requested a formal hearing. On January 13, 1981, Anderson, a white female, filed a Household Application for low income energy assistance. No one in her household is a migrant or migrant farm worker, and no one else has applied for the low income energy assistance. She lives alone, is legally blind, receives food stamps, and receives a bill for use of liquid propane for hearing purposes. By Notice of Application Denial mailed on February 13, 1981, Petitioner was informed that she was denied assistance for the reason that her monthly income exceeded the maximum income limit for a household of her size. The action was taken by Respondent within 45 days of Petitioner's application, and she was promptly notified of the reason for denial of benefits. Petitioner did not dispute the evidence presented by Respondent Department but was convinced the income limit by household size was unfair, particularly since she lives alone; but her house is large and rooms cannot be shut off, and she is elderly and blind. Petitioner Anderson's monthly household income is $343.30.
Recommendation Upon the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is recommended that DONE and ENTERED this 5th day of June, 1981, in Tallahassee, Florida. COPIES FURNISHED: Ann R. Anderson Route 4, Box 6325 Citra, FL 32627 James A. Sawyer, Esquire Department of HRS 3001 S.W. Broadway Ocala, FL 32671 Alvin J. Taylor, Secretary Department of HRS Building One, Room 406 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32301 DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND, Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 5th day of June, 1981.
