Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find Similar Cases by Filters
You can browse Case Laws by Courts, or by your need.
Find 49 similar cases
HAVEN OF OUR LADY OF PEACE vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, 01-003138 (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Pensacola, Florida Aug. 13, 2001 Number: 01-003138 Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
# 1
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs NEW DIRECTION INSTITUTE, 13-002386MPI (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Lauderhill, Florida Jun. 21, 2013 Number: 13-002386MPI Latest Update: May 30, 2014

Conclusions THE PARTIES resolved all disputed issues and executed a Settlement Agreement. The parties are directed to comply with the terms of the attached Settlement Agreement. Based on the foregoing, this file is CLOSED. DONE AND ORDERED this aPry of , 2014, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. Th YY ak for: ZU Yate “SECRETARY Agency for Health Care Administration Page 1 of 3 Filed May 30, 2014 12:55 PM Division of Administrative Hearings A PARTY WHO IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THIS FINAL ORDER IS ENTITLED TO A JUDICIAL REVIEW WHICH SHALL BE INSTITUTED BY FILING ONE COPY OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE AGENCY CLERK OF AHCA, AND A SECOND COPY ALONG WITH FILING FEE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW, WITH THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN THE APPELLATE DISTRICT WHERE THE AGENCY MAINTAINS ITS HEADQUARTERS OR WHERE A_ PARTY RESIDES. REVIEW PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA APPELLATE RULES. THE NOTICE OF APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RENDITION OF THE ORDER TO BE REVIEWED. Copies furnished to: Christopher A. Parella, J.D. CHC, CPC, CPCO The Health Law Offices of Anthony C. Vitale, P.A. 2333 Brickell Avenue, Suite A-1 Miami, Florida 33129 (U.S. Mail) Agency for Health Care Administration Douglas J. Lomonico, Assistant General Counsel (Electronic Mail) Agency for Health Care Administration Bureau of Finance and Accounting Richard Zenuch, Bureau Chief Agency for Health Care Administration Bureau of Medicaid Program Integrity Health Quality Assurance (HQA) (Electronic Mail) Department of Health (DOH) (Electronic Mail) Page 2 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Final Order has been furnished by United States Mail, interoffice mail, or email transmission to the above-referenced addressees this ne /fe- , 2014. 2 4 _—_) RICHARD J. SHOOP, Agency Clerk Agency for Health Care Administration 2727 Mahan Drive, MS #3 Tallahassee, Florida 32308 Telephone No.: (850)-412-3630 Facsimile No.: (850)-921-0158 Page 3 of 3

# 2
HOPE OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, 04-003855CON (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Miami Gardens, Florida Oct. 26, 2004 Number: 04-003855CON Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
# 3
ARTHUR DENNIS vs. MEDI-DYN, INC., 89-000875 (1989)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 89-000875 Latest Update: Jun. 26, 1989

Findings Of Fact Petitioner, who is black, was hired by Respondent on September 28, 1987. Respondent is in the business of providing health care institutions with management personnel to supervise environmental-services employees of the institutions. The management personnel supplied by Respondent for the typical customer consist of an on-site director, assistant director, and several supervisors. Respondent hired Petitioner as a supervisor for assignment to Holmes Regional Medical Center (Holmes). At the time, Respondent had six employees working at Holmes. The responsibilities of a supervisor typically include the management of 10-25 persons. The management responsibilities require, among other things: 1) "daily informal walk-through inspections of each area"; 2) "formal written inspections of each area or the job supervised with the employee at least every month"; 3) "aggressive[ness] in becoming acquainted with all key hospital personnel"; 4) the "develop[ment of] a good professional relationship with each [key hospital employee]"; and 5) the recruitment of personnel to be hired by the customer for assignment to the supervisor's department. Petitioner had limited relevant experience before joining Respondent. Petitioner had operated his own janitorial business, but had limited experience in supervision. As was the case with all employees, Respondent provided Petitioner with a fairly extensive orientation and training process. Prior to assuming his supervisory responsibilities, Petitioner successfully completed the training program, although he showed signs of ignoring the Medi-Dyn way of doing things and adhering to the ways of his former janitorial business. On December 28, 1987, Petitioner received his three-month evaluation, which employed a five-point rating. Petitioner averaged ratings of about "3," but received "marginal" ratings of "4" in areas such as initiative, planning, development of subordinates, training effectiveness, administrative ability, organization, and personnel management. Petitioner was responsible for supervising various areas of Holmes, including certain outbuildings, primarily during the late-evening and early- morning shift. The condition of these areas did not improve following the three-month evaluation. On January 25, 1988, a Holmes representative sent Respondent's director, Jeff Wahlen, a memorandum listing several complaints concerning the cleanliness of the diagnostic services area, for which Petitioner was responsible. On February 4, 1988, a representative of a user of one of the outbuildings for which Petitioner was responsible sent Petitioner a letter expressing "deep concern and frustration over the highly unsatisfactory work by [Respondent] at our hospital." On February 8, 1988, the supervisor of the health and fitness area at the hospital sent Mr. Wahlen a memorandum complaining that the cleanliness of the health and fitness area, for which Petitioner was responsible, was "getting worse." On February 9, 1988, Mr. Wahlen sent a memorandum to Petitioner itemizing numerous ;operational concerns" and establishing deadlines for achieving corrections of the noted problems. All of these deadlines were within February. On February 10, 1988, a representative of the bloodmobile/donor center sent a memorandum to Mr. Wahlen objecting to the uncleanliness of their work areas. Mr. Wahlen met with Petitioner that day and discussed cleaning problems in the bloodmobile/donor center areas. On February 18, 1988, Mr. Wahlen sent Petitioner a follow-up memorandum. Mr. Wahlen reminded Petitioner that the February 9 memorandum required that several objectives should already have been satisfied, but Mr. Wahlen had not received confirmation that these matters had been taken care of. On February 29, 1988, the supervisor of the health and fitness center sent Petitioner a memorandum informing him that many items on checklists dating from the prior November had still not been addressed. She advised Petitioner that she was considering the termination of the center's contract with Respondent. On March 10, 1988, Petitioner received a six-month evaluation in which his performance was rated as marginal, and he was placed on probation for 45 days. Petitioner received various tasks that he was to complete during the probationary period. He subsequently completed a large number of them. From April 13-15, 1988, Alfred Tambolio, who is the national operations director for Respondent, conducted a hospital-wide audit of the Holmes facility. He found that the areas within Petitioner's responsibility were unclean and in unsatisfactory condition. A week or two later, Mr. Tambolio returned to Holmes for a follow-up inspection. While examining the operating room, for which Petitioner was responsible, a physician told Mr. Tambolio and Petitioner that the area was "filthy." Leaving the operating room, with which Petitioner had displayed insufficient familiarity, Mr. Tambolio asked Petitioner to take him to the labor and delivery area, for which Petitioner was also responsible. Petitioner was unable even to find the area, and they had to ask a hospital employee for directions. Numerous other problems surfaced and many problems previously identified by Mr. Tambolio had not been corrected. By memorandum dated May 13, 1988, Mr. Wahlen reviewed Mr. Tambolio's second visit and informed Petitioner that he was being terminated. Mr. Wahlen acknowledged that Petitioner had recently been recommended for a satisfactory evaluation, but that Mr. Wahlen had declined to approve the tentative evaluation. Mr. Wahlen explained that, in essence, Petitioner's realization of certain goals did not outweigh his failure to provide satisfactory service in many other respects. Respondent replaced Petitioner with a person of Hispanic origin. As of May 1, 1988, Respondent employed a total of five blacks, one Hispanic, and one American Indian among its 27 employees serving as supervisors, assistant directors, and directors. Two of the eight directors were black.

Recommendation Based on the foregoing, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that the Petition for Relief filed by Petitioner be dismissed. ENTERED this 26th day of June, 1989, in Tallahassee, Florida. ROBERT E. MEALE Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 26th day of June, 1989. COPIES FURNISHED: Donald A. Griffin Executive Director Florida Commission on Human Relations 325 John Knox Road Building F, Suite 240 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1925 Dana Baird, Esquire General Counsel Florida Commission on Human Relations 325 John Knox Road Building F, Suite 240 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1925 Margaret Agerton, Clerk Florida Commission on Human Relations 325 John Knox Road Building F, Suite 240 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1925 Arthur Dennis, pro se 792 Cecilia Street Palm Bay, Florida 32909 Lynn Dunning Vice President, Operations Medi-Dyn, Inc. 8400 East Prentice Avenue Suite 800 Englewood, Colorado 80111

Florida Laws (2) 120.57760.10
# 5
THE GLENRIDGE ON PALMER RANCH vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, 01-002871CON (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Tallahassee, Florida Jul. 23, 2001 Number: 01-002871CON Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
# 6
TERESA G. RIUS vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, 14-006131 (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Miami, Florida Dec. 29, 2014 Number: 14-006131 Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2015

Conclusions THIS CAUSE came on for consideration before the Agency for Health Care Administration (“the Agency”), which finds and concludes as follows: 1. The Agency issued the Petitioner a letter denying her application for exemption from disqualification from employment. (Exhibit 1) 2. The Petitioner requested a formal administrative hearing and the case was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH). 3. Subsequently, the Petitioner and the Agency filed a Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice. The Administrative Law Judge issued an order closing file with leave to re-open the matter and relinquishing jurisdiction to the Agency. (Exhibit 2) 4. The denial of the Petitioner’s application for exemption from disqualification from employment is UPHELD without prejudice to the Petitioner reapplying for an exemption from disqualification from employment in the future. ORDERED in Tallahassee, Florida, on this £75 day wo Phawh 2015. CBee Agency for Health Care Administration Filed March 19, 2015 9:19 AM Division of Administrative Hearings

Other Judicial Opinions A party that is adversely affected by this Final Order is entitled to seek judicial review which shall be instituted by filing one copy of a notice of appeal with the agency clerk of AHCA, and a second copy, with the District Court of Appeal in the appellate district where the agency maintains its headquarters or where a party resides. Review of proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with the Florida appellate rules. The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 along with filing fee as prescribed by law, days of rendition of the order to be reviewed. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I] HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy named persons/entities by the method designated on this _/ ay of Lfare& is Final Order was served on the below- Richard Shoop, Agency Clerk Agency for Health Care Administration 2727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop #3 Tallahassee, Florida 32308-5403 Telephone (850) 412-3630 Jan Mills Facilities Intake Unit Agency for Health Care Administration (Electronic Mail) Taylor Haddock, Supervisor Background Screening Unit Bureau of Long Term Care Services Agency for Health Care Administration (Electronic Mail) Lindsay Granger, Assistant General Counsel Office of the General Counsel Agency for Health Care Administration (Electronic Mail) Lorenzo Palomares, Esquire Palomares-Starbuck and Associates 2333 Brickell Ave., Suite A-1 Miami, FL 33129 (U.S. Mail) John G. Van Laningham Administrative Law Judge The Division of Administrative Hearings (Electronic Mail)

# 7
CITY OF ORLANDO vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, 07-003477 (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Orlando, Florida Jul. 26, 2007 Number: 07-003477 Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
# 9

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer