Homeowners can lose their residential properties through one of two methods of foreclosure: judicial foreclosure (a process that involves the court system) and nonjudicial foreclosure (which allows a lender to sell the property without prior approval from a judge). The foreclosure type that your bank chooses will depend on the options afforded by the law of the state where the property is located. In either case, foreclosure law is complicated, which means that hiring a knowledgeable attorney will increase your chances of keeping your home.
A judicial foreclosure requires the lender to go through the state court system and receive approval from a judge to foreclose on a property. All states allow the lender to foreclose judicially; however, some require this process exclusively. For instance, in New York and Ohio, foreclosures are judicial. (To learn about the options available to you in foreclosure, see Homeowner's Options When Facing Foreclosure.)
The lender starts the process by filing a lawsuit with the court. In the lender’s opening pleading, often called a “complaint” or a “petition,” the lender asks the court for the right to sell the home and apply the proceeds from the sale to the debt.
If state law allows for it, the complaint might also ask the court to grant a deficiency judgment if selling the property won’t fully pay off the debt. If granted, the borrower will remain responsible for the outstanding balance left on the loan after the foreclosure sale. Some states don't allow deficiency judgments under certain circumstances.
After the lender files the court case, you must file a responsive pleading—such as an answer to the complaint or motion to dismiss the case—with the court generally within 30 or fewer days. If you don’t respond, the lender will ask the court for a default judgment and will automatically be declared the winner.
Your response must be in the format described in the local court rules. For example, you’ll likely need to create a caption at the top of the first page that includes the names of the people and businesses involved in the lawsuit, the name and address of the court, and the case number. If you file an answer, you’ll include responses to each of the claims made by the lender and any defenses you might have, as well.
It’s important to understand that filing an answer isn’t always the best choice. If you have an argument that requires you to file another type of pleading to preserve your rights, filing an incorrect response might cause you to lose an important right. For instance, a lender must comply with the law before a court has “jurisdiction” (authority) to hear a case. If the lender made a mistake, like by failing to properly serve you with the lawsuit, you can dispute the court’s jurisdiction by filing a motion to dismiss. If you win, the lender must start over. If, however, you file an answer, you are “stipulating,” or agreeing, that the court has the right to hear the matter and the case moves forward. Bottom-line, litigation is tricky stuff and most people fare better by getting help from a lawyer. (To find out how a foreclosure attorney can help, see When Should I Hire a Foreclosure Attorney?)
Once you file your answer, the lawsuit will move to the discovery stage—the stage that allows both sides learn about evidence in the other’s possession. Both you and the lender will be able to obtain information using discovery tools, such as:
As a result of what it learns during discovery, the lender might file a “summary judgment” motion, asking the judge to decide the entire matter without a trial, based solely on what the discovery process brought to light. The lender will present its arguments and evidence—as developed during discovery—in the motion. You have the right to oppose the motion by submitting your arguments and evidence, as well. If the court finds that you don’t have evidence that can support a defense, the lender will win the motion, obtain a judgment, and be free to proceed with a foreclosure sale. If the judge denies the lender’s motion, the court will allow the case to proceed to trial.
To complete a nonjudicial foreclosure, the lender follows the steps outlined in state law. About half of the states allow nonjudicial foreclosures, including California, Nevada, and Arizona. Although the exact steps vary from state to state, the lender might have to:
Some states allow the lender to send just a notice of sale, a combined notice of default and sale, or permit notification by publishing a notice in the newspaper and posting it somewhere on the property or somewhere public. You might face a deficiency judgment lawsuit following a nonjudicial foreclosure, depending on state law. To fight a nonjudicial foreclosure, you, or your attorney, will have to file a lawsuit on your behalf, and then the case will generally proceed in the same manner as a judicial foreclosure
The length of the foreclosure process depends on the type of foreclosure and the laws in your state. For example, once officially started, nonjudicial foreclosure can happen pretty quickly because there is no court action—though it varies by state. In Georgia, a nonjudicial foreclosure can be completed in 30 days. In California, it takes about four months. (Learn about the federal law that delays the start of most foreclosures for 120 days.)
Judicial foreclosures usually last longer (not always) because a court must sign off on the foreclosure. But if you fail to file a response to a complaint and the lender obtains a default judgment against you, the case could be over in as little as a month. That’s not usually what happens, though. If you respond in a timely manner, court backlogs and judges’ burdened schedules can result in a wait of six months to several years before your foreclosure action goes to trial. New York and New Jersey are examples of places known for their lengthy foreclosure process. (Learn which states have long foreclosure timelines.)
Recourse against testing monopoly
A testing monopoly, ETS, whose GRE test is required by virtually every college and university and whose scores in part determine one's ability to enter graduate school and to receive funding, will not allow me to present evidence that my score on the analytical (writing) test does not represent my actual writing skills. I have gone through their procedure, but as I am not allowed to present evidence or even to see why my score was so low, I have no recourse and am totally at their mercy. Meanwhile, the schools to which I have applied now have conflicting information--on the one hand, I have straight As in my Master's work in English (all of which is judged on my writing skills), three references that my master's thesis was in the top 5% of theses; on the other, these potential grad schools see that I have a 740 verbal score and a mere 3.5 analytical writing score! Clearly, the ETS testing firm has failed to represent my writing skills accurately. I want to know what recourse I have to force ETS to reassess my writing under real and accurate circumstances. Which area of law would be best for representation?