Bay FL and Criminal defense Lawyers | Alvin Lee Peters -- eLawyers

Alvin Lee Peters

Visitors: 68

Bar #473030(FL) License for 40 years; Member in Good Standing

Panama City FL

Are you Alvin Lee Peters? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Florida Administrative Code: 61G15-23.002, 64B8-8.0011

17-004337PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs RAQUEL C. SKIDMORE, M. D. (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 02, 2017

The issues to be decided are whether Respondent violated sections 456.072(1)(a), (n), and (w), and 458.331(1)(g), (k), (q), and (v), Florida Statutes (2015), as alleged in the Administrative Complaint; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent sold prescription for medical marijuana to a non-resident prior to qualifying as an ordering physician, without advising patient that medical marijuana was still illegal in Florida. Recommend revocation.

05-004270PL FLORIDA ENGINEERS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION vs LESTER M. MAPLES, P.E. (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 21, 2005

The issues are whether Respondent violated Section 471.033(1)(g), Florida Statutes (2003), by negligence in the practice of engineering, and whether Respondent violated Sections 471.023 and 471.033(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2003), by practicing engineering through a business organization that did not, nor does it currently have, a Certificate of Authorization.Respondent drew fire protection plans while working for a corporation that was required to have a certificate of authorization, but did not have one.

05-004271PL FLORIDA ENGINEERS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION vs LESTER M. MAPLES, P.E. (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 21, 2005

The issue is whether Respondent violated Sections 455.227(1)(a) and 471.033(1)(g), Florida Statutes.Respondent offered engineering opinions in a disciplinary proceeding without being informed as to the facts.

02-004170 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs BLUE HAVEN RETIREMENT, INC., D/B/A BLUE HAVE RETIREMENT CENTER (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 25, 2002

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the Respondent has committed a violation of the "physical plant standards" contained in Rule 58A-5.023, Florida Administrative Code, contended by AHCA to be a Class II violation.Petitioner proved indirect threat to physical well being of residents, not a direct threat; therefore, only a Class III (not a Class II) violation. No fine because Respondent corrected the deficiency.

02-004774PL FLORIDA ENGINEERS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION vs LESTER M. MAPLES, P.E. (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2002

Whether Respondent's professional engineers' license should be disciplined.Evidence did not show negligence in engineering; dispute over how hydraulic reference points are to be labeled does not show negligence; the points correlated to points on fire protection drawing and drawing enables a person to understand construction.

02-002511 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs CREATIVE LIVING CENTERS, INC., D/B/A COVE MANOR RETIREMENT (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 20, 2002

The issues are whether Respondent failed to maintain an accurate medication record relating to narcotic medications in violation of Section 400.419(1)(b), Florida Statutes, and Rule 58A-5.0185(3)(b), Florida Administrative Code; and if so, what penalty should be imposed.The evidence is not clear and convincing that Respondent failed to maintain an accurate medication observation for each resident.

86-004083 GLORIA HORD vs. BELL AEROSPACE TEXTRON (1986)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Sep. 22, 1987

Whether petitioner suffered sexual harassment for which respondent is answerable, or whether, on account of her sex, respondent discriminated against her by paying her unequal wages, or whether, in terminating her employment, respondent retaliated against her on account of statutorily protected activity?Petitioner failed to prove sexual harassment and gender based discrimination as reasons for termination. Petition for relief dismissed.