Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Amy Reisinger Turci
Amy Reisinger Turci
Visitors: 27
0
Bar #349630(FL)     License for 24 years
Jacksonville FL

Are you Amy Reisinger Turci? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

11-005643  WINDOW MITCHELL vs NORTH FLORIDA SALES COMPANY/BUDWEISER  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 03, 2011
The issue is whether the Respondent committed an unlawful employment practice under section 760.10, Florida Statutes, by discriminating against Petitioner on the basis of handicap or disability, and if so, what is the appropriate remedy.Petitioner failed to prove an unlawful employment practice under section 760.10, Florida Statutes, for discrimination on the basis of handicap.
11-000055  CARI ANDERSON vs WAL-MART STORES EAST  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 07, 2011
Whether Petitioner has been the subject of discrimination in a public accommodation due to a disability.Petitioner became loud and disruptive in the store when managers tried to inform her that dogs couldn't be in store and tried to ask if service dogs. Truthful call to police was not discriminatory. Petitioner's own actions caused arrest.
03-001230  NIMALI SONDEL vs ADVENT CHRISTIAN VILLAGE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 03, 2003
Whether Respondent employer is guilty of an unlawful employment practice, by failure to hire Petitioner on the basis of her color and/or national origin.Discrimination by color and/or national origin was not proven by direct, statistical, or circumstantial evidence. These methods, the shifting burden of proof, and the rebuttal effect of statements are discussed.
02-002746  WILLIAM MITCHELL vs WHITE OAK PLANTATION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 11, 2002
Whether Respondent Employer is guilty of an unlawful employment practice, as defined by Chapter 760, Part I, Florida Statutes, against Petitioner on the basis of his race (African- American).Racially motivated and derogatory remarks were proven but were not so pervasive as to establish a prima facie case of abusive work environment. Respondent employer not liable because it took prompt and appropriate remedial action once it knew of remarks.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer