Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Austin Baylor Neal
Austin Baylor Neal
Visitors: 50
0
License for 30 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Austin Baylor Neal? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

01-004828  NATIONAL COUNCIL ON COMPENSATION INSURANCE vs DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 12, 2001
Whether the workers' compensation insurance rate filing made by Petitioner, as amended on September 21, 2001, should be approved.Recommended that Department of Insurance affirm its disapproval of proposed rate increase.
00-003238  DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs SUPERIOR INSURANCE COMPANY  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 04, 2000
The issues are whether Respondent has made unauthorized payments to Superior Insurance Group, its corporate parent, and whether Respondent has properly disclosed these payments on its financial reports filed with Petitioner.Petitioner proved Respondent violated consent order approving acquisition of Respondent by holding corporation when Respondent paid Finance and Service Fees to parent corporation. Financial reports inadequate, misleading as to related party transactions.
00-003553RU  MEDIMPACT HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 28, 2000
Whether the Department of Management Services ("DMS") or the ("Department") has an unpromulgated rule which states, in effect, that the Department will select the solicitation procurement method known as an Invitation to Negotiate when it is in the Department's best interests to do so even if rule requirements for the selection have not been met? Whether the statement contained in the Invitation to Negotiate (ITN Number-DSGI 00-001) issued in April 2000 by the Division of State Group Insurance ("DSGI") for the purchase of pharmacy benefits management services to the effect that "a late-submitted offer to negotiate will be returned unopened" is an unpromulgated rule? Whether, although not pled, the Petitioner proved at final hearing the existence of other unpromulgated rules?Statements contrary to agency rules are not statements of general applicability. They are statements with no applicability.
00-003900BID  MEDIMPACT HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF STATE GROUP INSURANCE  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 20, 2000
Among the many issues in Case No. 00-3900BID, there are three main issues: whether it was proper for the Division of State Group Insurance ("DSGI" or the "agency") to reject and return unopened the response of Petitioner MedImpact Healthcare Systems, Inc., to DSGI's Invitation to Negotiate (the "ITN") for pharmacy benefits management services? If not, and the response should have been accepted and opened, whether DSGI's selection of an ITN as the method for soliciting suppliers eligible to provide pharmacy benefits management services for DSGI is an issue properly in the case? Finally, whether Merck-Medco Managed Care L.L.C. ("MMMC") has standing to intervene in this proceeding?Division of State Group Insurance wrongly rejected a late-filed submission to an Invitation to Negotiate delivered late by Federal Express because of severe thunderstorms over Memphis, Tennessee.
94-005599RP  FLORIDA AUTOMOBILE UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND TREASURER  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 07, 1994
The central issues in these cases are the Petitioners' challenges to proposed rules of the Department of Insurance (Department).Challenges to proposed rules establish agency has expanded statutes in part but are within discretion otherwise.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer