Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Brian David Berkowitz
Brian David Berkowitz
Visitors: 78
0
Bar #361984(FL)     License for 42 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Brian David Berkowitz? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

03-003670BID  MAD DADS OF GREATER OCALA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2003
The issue in these cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice's (Department) proposed award of certain contracts to Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. (BAYS), based on evaluations of proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Failure to make proper deposit at time of filing bid protest requires dismissal of petition. Evidence fails to establish Respondent`s evaluation of proposals was erroneous or unreasonable.
03-003671BID  JUVENILE SERVICES PROGRAM, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2003
The issue in these cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice's (Department) proposed award of certain contracts to Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. (BAYS), based on evaluations of proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Failure to make proper deposit at time of filing bid protest requires dismissal of petition. Evidence fails to establish the Respondent`s evaluation of proposals was erroneous or unreasonable.
03-003672BID  JUVENILE SERVICES PROGRAM, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2003
The issue in these cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice's (Department) proposed award of certain contracts to Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. (BAYS), based on evaluations of proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Failure to make proper deposit at time of filing bid protest requires dismissal of petition. Evidence fails to establish Respondent`s evaluation of proposals was erroneous or unreasonable.
03-003673BID  JUVENILE SERVICES PROGRAM, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2003
The issue in these cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice's (Department) proposed award of certain contracts to Bay Area Youth Services, Inc. (BAYS), based on evaluations of proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Failure to make proper deposit at time of filing bid protest requires dismissal of petition. Evidence fails to establish Respondent`s evaluation of proposals was erroneous or unreasonable.
02-002825BID  VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 17, 2002
In its formal written protest, Petitioner VisionQuest National, Ltd. (VisionQuest), through paragraph 6.d. and e., challenged the manner in which Respondent Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) assigned and weighed points in accordance with specifications set forth in RFP I5J01 (the RFP). The first issue to be resolved concerns the timeliness of that challenge to the specifications. The aspects of the RFP specifications challenged in the formal written protest are related to the assignment of points for past performance in carrying out contracts with DJJ for non-residential programs which can total 250 out of 1000 possible points in the competition. Section 120.57(3)(b), Florida Statutes. The second issue to be resolved concerns the appropriate disposition in the case where DJJ has conceded that the actions of some of its evaluators in considering responses to the RFP materially deviated from agency policy and the expectations in the RFP, thus compromising the evaluation process. Section 120.57(3)(f), Florida Statutes.The agency materially breached the terms of the Request for Proposals, causing the rejection of all bids.
02-002966BID  CORRECTIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 2002
Are the intended contract awards by the Department of Juvenile Justice (Department) to Intervenor, Ramsay Youth Services, Inc. (Ramsay) under Request for Proposal (RFP) Numbers J5G01 and J5G02 contrary to the Department's governing statutes, applicable rules or policies, or the specifications of the RFPs?Petitioner failed to show that intended contract awards to Ramsay were arbitrary or capricious, contrary to competition, or clearly erroneous, or that contract awards were contrary to Department`s governing statutes or applicable rules.
02-002967BID  CORRECTIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 2002
Are the intended contract awards by the Department of Juvenile Justice (Department) to Intervenor, Ramsay Youth Services, Inc. (Ramsay) under Request for Proposal (RFP) Numbers J5G01 and J5G02 contrary to the Department's governing statutes, applicable rules or policies, or the specifications of the RFPs?Petitioner failed to show that intended contract awards to Ramsay were arbitrary or capricious, contrary to competition, or clearly erroneous, or that contract awards were contrary to Department`s governing statutes or applicable rules.
01-003020BID  BROWN SCHOOLS OF FLORIDA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 2001
Whether the proposed action to award a contract to the Intervenor, Three Springs, Inc., is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Bias exhibited in deflated score of Petitioner not sufficient to overcome correct scoring attributed to successful offeror.
00-001366BID  SOUTH FLORIDA JAIL MINISTRIES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 30, 2000
Whether Petitioner's protest, challenging Respondent's "identif[ication of] Associated Marine Institute[s], Inc. for potential award(s) [of] the contract" advertised in RFP No. K9018, should be sustained in whole or in part?The selection of a proposer for potential award of a contract was premature where cost proposals had not yet been evaluated.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer