Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Carl Schuster
Carl Schuster
Visitors: 133
1
Bar #71490(FL)     License for 62 years; Member in Good Standing
Fort Lauderdale FL

Are you Carl Schuster? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

17-1507P  Ramos-Santiago v. WHM Carib LLC  (2019)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Mar. 22, 2019
remaining claim.resort (Rio Mar) in Río Grande, Puerto Rico.251 F.3d at 16.[Willenberg] collecting his prize money.9 Ramos-Santiago makes no argument on appeal in support of, his motion for reconsideration other than to reiterate that the, district court erroneously applied summary judgment law.
96-1885  Rivera Flores v. Bristol Myers  (1997)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Apr. 25, 1997
In response to his claim for disability benefits, the, Social Security Administration found in September 1994 that, Rivera was disabled and suffered from pain, post-traumatic, stress disorder and dysthymic disorder. nor did he file an affidavit under Fed.waiver and release are valid as to them.
95-1867  Ayala-Gerena v. Bristol-Myers  (1996)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Sep. 05, 1996
Appellants' untimely motion to compel document production., Not only were they not part of the original summary judgment, materials, but Appellants have not demonstrated why this new, evidence could not have been timely provided with the summary, judgment materials.
97-1770  Dominguez v. Eli Lilly  (1998)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Mar. 11, 1998
EDDIE DOMINGUEZ, ET AL., Appellants assert on appeal that the district court, gave undue emphasis to the Puerto Rico district court's anti-, ferret rule, D.P.R. R. 311.12, rather than following Federal, Rule of Civil Procedure 56's requirement to evaluate all the, record evidence.
97-1801  Torres v. Eli Lilly  (1997)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Dec. 10, 1997
Circuit Judges., ____________________________, Carl Schuster, with whom Carlos R. Paula and Schuster Usera, _____________ _______________ ______________, Aguilo Santiago were on brief, for appellees.court's thoughtful rescript.district court did not choose to invoke the provisions of Fed.
92-1863  Lopez v. Lambert, Inc.  (1992)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Dec. 18, 1992
December 18, 1992 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT _________________________ No. 92-1863 MILAGROS RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY, Defendant, Appellee. ________ 2
95-1407  Virapen v. Eli Lilly, S.A.  (1995)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Sep. 22, 1995
JOHN VIRAPEN, ET AL.had failed to prove his case.basis to disturb the district court's decision.denied the opportunity to adduce rebuttal evidence rings hollow.the mode and manner of presenting evidence, see Fed. Searle Co., 496 F.2d 444, 447 (10th Cir.employment discrimination misses the mark.
13-2366  Planadeball v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.  (2015)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jul. 17, 2015
and Maley., and Puerto Rico law., 5, Wyndham also contends that we should not consider Estes's, conduct while evaluating Planadeball's retaliation claim because, Planadeball failed to amend her complaint to incorporate Estes's, actions that took place after Planadeball had filed her complaint.
12-2226  Velazquez-Perez v. Developers Diversified Realty  (2014)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: May 23, 2014
of DDR's human resources department for Puerto Rico. and email. Martínez, Albino, and González began to extensively discuss a the authority to make the decision. claim, Velázquez would have to show that harassment was so severe decision, Velázquez could not prevail on a Title VII harassment
13-1475  Rivera-Diaz v. Humana Health Plans of Puerto  (2014)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Apr. 11, 2014
GIOVANNI RIVERA-DíAZ ET AL.federal district court.time limits.discrimination or retaliation cases. See Jorge, 404 F.3d at 564.ninety-day period for filing suit had expired.suit-filing period.2, Cardona and CTS advance additional arguments for dismissal, of the plaintiff's claims against them.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer