Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Charles E Scarlett
Charles E Scarlett
Visitors: 40
0
Bar #380733(FL)     License for 41 years; Member in Good Standing
Boca Raton FL

Are you Charles E Scarlett? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

2D08-5642  FW v. State  (2008)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 02, 2008 Citations: 995 So. 2d 963
995 So. 2d 963 (2008) F.W. v. STATE. No. 2D08-5642. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. December 2, 2008. Decision without published opinion. App.dismissed.
87-004623  HAROLD SELIGMAN vs. DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE  (1987)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jul. 28, 1988
Whether Petitioner may be granted a certificate as an associated person of a securities firm.Order of preliminary injuction was sufficient, despite misunderstanding as to legal effect thereof, to bar applicant an associated person certificate
86-001500  DANNY JOE HOLMES vs. OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER  (1986)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Nov. 17, 1987
The ultimate issues in these two consolidated cases are whether Danny Joe Holmes is entitled to licensure as an associated person with Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc., in the State of Florida, and further, whether the license as an associated person with Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc., issued to Thomas H. Holmes, should be revoked based upon the facts and violations alleged in the Notice of Administrative Charges.Sales of unregistered securities and other charges of misrepresentation in sale of securities and making material false statements in applications.
86-001847  GLENN PATRICK YOUNG vs. OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER  (1986)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Apr. 29, 1987
Sale of nonexempt unregistered securities, some by unregistered persons. No scienter fraud by salesmen. Company responsible for failure to deliver
86-004055  KENNETH JOSEPH WHITEHEAD vs. DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE, DIVISION OF SECURITIES  (1986)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Mar. 19, 1987
The basic issue in this case is whether the Petitioner's application for registration as an associated person in the state of Florida with Value Equities Corporation should be granted or denied. The Department proposes to deny the application on the basis of Section 517.161(1)(h) and (k), Florida Statutes, contending that the Petitioner has demonstrated his unworthiness to transact the business of an associated person and is of bad business repute. The Petitioner has little, if any dispute with the facts relied upon by the Department, but offered evidence in mitigation and asserts that, on the facts in this case, he is entitled to registration. Subsequent to the hearing in this case, a transcript was filed on March 4, 1987, and, pursuant to ruling at the close of the hearing, the parties were allowed until March 16, 1987, within which to file their proposed recommended orders. Both parties filed timely post-hearing documents, containing proposed findings of fact. A specific ruling on all proposed findings of fact is contained in the Appendix attached to and incorporated into this recommended order.Evidence establishes that applicant is of bad business repute and is unworthy to transact business of associated person; appl. should be denied.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer