Leon FL Lawyers | Charles F Tunnicliff -- eLawyers

64870 Boedy v. Dept. of Professional Regulation (1985)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jan. 31, 1985 Citations: 463 So. 2d 215

463 So. 2d 215 (1985) R. Frederick BOEDY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Respondent. No. 64870. Supreme Court of Florida. January 31, 1985. Philip J. Padovano, Tallahassee, for petitioner. Charles F. Tunnicliff, Senior Atty., Dept. of Professional Regulation, Tallahassee, for respondent. ADKINS, Justice. This cause is before us pursuant to a certified question of great public importance from the First District Court of Appeal. Boedy v. Department of Professional Regulation,..

15-007347 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs LATCHMAN'S SEAFOOD MARKET AND GRILL, INC., D/B/A LATCHMAN'S SEAFOOD MARKET AND GRILL, INC. (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 29, 2015

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the administrative complaints dated July 8, 2015, and September 30, 2015; and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that an administrative penalty of $2,150.00 and recoupment of investigative costs were warranted for health and safety violations found at the Respondent's restaurant.

15-007350 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs LATCHMAN'S SEAFOOD MARKET AND GRILL, INC., D/B/A LATCHMAN'S SEAFOOD MARKET AND GRILL, INC. (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 29, 2015

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the administrative complaints dated July 8, 2015, and September 30, 2015; and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that an administrative penalty of $2,150.00 and recoupment of investigative costs were warranted for health and safety violations found at the Respondent's restaurant.

16-000622 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs ELBIOLI ALAA, D/B/A MIAMI SUBS GRILL (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 03, 2016

The issues are whether the shelves of a walk-in cooler were rusty and pitted, in violation of Food Code Rule 4-4.101.19; grease was deposited around the grease receptacle, in violation of Food Code Rule 5-501.116(B); and the employer failed, upon request, to provide evidence of employee food-handler training, as required by section 509.049(5), Florida Statutes. If any of these violations are proved, an additional issue is the penalty that should be imposed.One thousand dollar fine is recommended against restaurant for failing to correct three violations: rusty shelves in walk-in cooler, greasy deposits around grease receptacle, and failure to produce employee training certificates.

15-005827 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs LATIN BOHEMIA GRILL INC., D/B/A LATIN BOHEMIA GRILL (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 16, 2015

The issues are whether Respondent's dishmachine chlorine sanitizer was not at proper minimum strength, in violation of Food Code Rule 4-501.114(A); whether vacuum breakers were missing from hose bibs at the mop sink, in violation of Food Code Rule 5-203.14; and whether kitchen ceiling light fixtures hosted an accumulation of dead insects, in violation of Food Code Rule 6-501.112. If any of these violations are proved, an additional issue is the penalty that should be imposed.$1875 fine for two high priority and one basic second Food Code offenses for restaurant.

15-002308 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs MEXICAN FOOD EL RINCONCITO MEXICANO, LLC, D/B/A EL RICONCITO MEXICANO (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 22, 2015

The issue in this matter is whether Respondent was out of compliance with the food safety requirements of chapter 509, Florida Statutes (2015),1/ and the implementing administrative rules of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants; and, if so, what disciplinary action is appropriate.Respondent's violation of food safety requirements of chapter 509, Florida Statutes, and implementing rules warrants an administrative fine.

14-005644 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs NEGRIL CUISINE, INC., D/B/A BANANA HUT (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 26, 2014

Whether Negril Cuisine, Inc., d/b/a Banana Hut (Respondent), committed the offenses alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated September 30, 2014, and if so, the penalties that should be imposed.The Department should impose an administrative fine against restaurant because inspector saw roaches in a storage closet and in the kitchen.

14-003495 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs ZORBA'S PIZZA RESTAURANT, INC., D/B/A ZORBA'S GREEK RESTAURANT (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 24, 2014

The issue in this case is whether on June 23, 2014, Respondent, Zorba's Pizza Restaurant, Inc., d/b/a Zorba's Greek Restaurant (Zorba's), was in compliance with food safety requirements set forth in administrative rules of Petitioner, Department of Business and Professional Regulation (Department), Division of Hotels and Restaurants, and, if not, what penalty is appropriate.Department of Business and Professional Regulation proved by clear and convincing evidence that food in Zorba's cooler was kept at temperatures above the permitted level.

14-003512 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs ITALIO EAST BOCA, LLC, D/B/A ITALIO (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 28, 2014

The issue in this case is whether on October 23, 2013, and May 6, 2014, Respondent was out of compliance with the food safety requirements of section 509.032, Florida Statutes, and implementing administrative rules of the Division of Hotels and Restaurants of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, as alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint, and if so, what penalty is appropriate.Respondent's violations of food safety requirements of chapter 509, Florida Statutes, and implementing rules warrant a $400 fine.

14-004018 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs GRANDPA JOHN'S GEORGIA BBQ AND SOUL FOOD, LLC (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 25, 2014

The issue is whether Respondent is guilty of the violation described in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, what is the appropriate penalty.Food establishment held perishable good items at improper temperature; $250.00 fine imposed.

Charles F Tunnicliff