Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Debora Elizabeth Fridie
Debora Elizabeth Fridie
Visitors: 87
0
Bar #886580(FL)     License for 34 years
Orange Park FL

Are you Debora Elizabeth Fridie? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

08-001697  SHORE ACRES REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 07, 2008
The issues in this case are whether Respondent applied the proper reimbursement principles to Petitioners' initial Medicaid rate setting, and whether elements of detrimental reliance exist so as to require Respondent to establish a particular initial rate for Petitioners' facilities.Petitioners did not meet their burden of proof. The Agency`s actions were proper and correct. No estoppel applies to the facts of this case.
08-003155  NORTH LAKE REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 30, 2008
The issues in this case are whether Respondent applied the proper reimbursement principles to Petitioners' initial Medicaid rate setting, and whether elements of detrimental reliance exist so as to require Respondent to establish a particular initial rate for Petitioners' facilities.Petitioners did not meet their burden of proof. The Agency`s actions were proper and correct. No estoppel applies to the facts of this case.
08-001698  PALMETTO REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 07, 2008
The issues in this case are whether Respondent applied the proper reimbursement principles to Petitioners' initial Medicaid rate setting, and whether elements of detrimental reliance exist so as to require Respondent to establish a particular initial rate for Petitioners' facilities.Petitioners did not meet their burden of proof. The Agency`s actions were proper and correct. No estoppel applies to the facts of this case.
08-001699  ADVANCED REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 07, 2008
The issues in this case are whether Respondent applied the proper reimbursement principles to Petitioners' initial Medicaid rate setting, and whether elements of detrimental reliance exist so as to require Respondent to establish a particular initial rate for Petitioners' facilities.Petitioners did not meet their burden of proof. The Agency`s actions were proper and correct. No estoppel applies to the facts of this case.
08-001700  WOODBRIDGE REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 07, 2008
The issues in this case are whether Respondent applied the proper reimbursement principles to Petitioners' initial Medicaid rate setting, and whether elements of detrimental reliance exist so as to require Respondent to establish a particular initial rate for Petitioners' facilities.Petitioners did not meet their burden of proof. The Agency`s actions were proper and correct. No estoppel applies to the facts of this case.
06-000379MPI  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs WILLIAM O. KABRY, M.D.  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 30, 2006
Whether Medicaid overpayments were made to Petitioner by the Agency for Health Care Administration ("AHCA") for services performed during the audit period of August 1, 2000, to August 1, 2002 (the "audit period"), and, if so, what is the total amount of these overpayments.Respondent failed to overcome Petitioner`s prima facie showing that Respondent received Medicaid overpayments for office visits.
04-001828RX  THE FLORIDA RETAIL FEDERATION, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 19, 2004
The issue in this case is whether the methodology that Respondent uses to determine the amounts payable to pharmacies for prescription drugs dispensed to Medicaid beneficiaries constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority on the ground that the methodology in question, which is incorporated by reference in Florida Administrative Code Rule 59G-4.250, enlarges, modifies, or contravenes the specific provisions of law implemented.Rule challenge dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, or as moot, in light of recently enacted statutes largely superceding the rule in question. The rule`s definition of "usual and customary" constitutes a valid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
04-003025MPI  HENRY LEPELY, M.D. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 24, 2004
The issues are whether Petitioner received a Medicaid overpayment for claims paid during the audit period, August 1, 1997, through August 25, 1999, and if so, what is the amount that Petitioner is obligated to reimburse to Respondent.Petitioner received an overpayment for Medicaid services; Petitioner`s patient records failed to justify the claims he filed and for which he was paid.
03-001197MPI  EVAN B. SHENFELD vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 01, 2003
Whether the Respondent overpaid the Petitioner for services covered by the Medicaid program as claimed by the Final Agency Audit Report and, if so, in what amount.No disputed issues of fact to be resolved when Petitioner agrees to repay the amount claimed.
03-001607MPI  MAZHAR G. NAWAZ, M. D. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 01, 2003
The issue for determination is whether Petitioner received Medicaid overpayments and, if so, the total amount of the overpayments. Petitioner agreed at the onset of the hearing not to contest the findings of the Agency that Petitioner received Medicaid monies to which he was not entitled. Therefore, the issue remaining for determination is: Whether Respondent calculated the overpayment amount of $52,850.82 using a valid statistical formula and a valid sample of recipients and claims during the audit period of March 1, 2000, through March 1, 2002.Petitioner by improper coding overbilled for medical services and permitted billing by persons who were not Medicaid providers. Recommend repayment of $52,850.82 to Respondent with interest.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer