welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Dennis Edward LaRosa
Dennis Edward LaRosa
Dennis Edward LaRosa
Visitors: 44
0
Bar #170598(FL)    
Tallahassee FL

Are you Dennis Edward LaRosa? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

80-002064  DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs. JARUQUITO GROCERY  (1980)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jan. 09, 1981
$100 penalty within thirty days or suspend license for two weeks for selling unlicensed beer.
78-001808  DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC.  (1978)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 23, 1980
The issues in this case are as set forth in the attached copy of the Notice to Show Cause and by its attachment this copy becomes a part of the Recommended Order. This Notice to Show Cause in its various counts raises the question of whether the action of the Respondent which took place on March 21, 1978, through its "bar spending" practice (i.e., the practice of a representative of manufacturer or a wholesaler purchasing drinks for consumers at the premises of a retail licensee) has violated the provisions of Subsection 561.42(1), Florida Statutes.Petitioner failed to prove Respondent gave gifts or loans to businesses it sold that were not in the course of business. Dismiss.
78-000745  DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs. NEWPORT MOTEL, INC., T/A NEWPORT RESORT MOTEL  (1978)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 23, 1980
Dismiss charges. There was no evidence that the complaining witnesses reserved the special rate in advance that was later supposedly denied them in violation of statute.
78-000746  DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS vs. S. B. PARTNERS, T/A FAIRVIEW VILLAS  (1978)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Oct. 06, 1978
Respondent wrongfully withheld security deposit from tenant. Recommend fine unless restitution is made.
77-001591  DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs. P AND D, INC., T/A PETE AND LENNY`S  (1977)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Feb. 17, 1978
By Notice to Show Cause filed August 24, 1977, the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Petitioner, seeks to revoke, suspend or otherwise discipline the license of P & D, Inc. t/a Pete and Lenny's. As grounds therefor it is alleged that on or about June 29, 1977 Respondent failed to discontinue the sale of alcoholic beverages when the service of full course wools had been discontinued. Three witnesses were called by Petitioner, two witnesses were called by Respondent and one exhibit was admitted into evidence.Respondent holder of restaurant license had no ability to prepare food and served alcohol in excess of 51 percent of revenues. Recommend suspension.
75-000289  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. WATSON REXALL DRUG  (1975)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jan. 04, 1977
Whether Respondent had violated Section 479.07(1), Florida statutes, in that no permits were secured for subject sign for the years 1973, 1974 and 1975.Respondent didn't get permits for sign for years. Recommend removal of the sign unless Respondent removes/gets permit first.
75-000287  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. BOWDEN`S GROCERY  (1975)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Aug. 07, 1975
ISSUES: Whether Respondent had violated Section 479.07(1), Florida statutes, in that no permits were secured for subject sign for the years 1974 and 1975.Respondent didn't get permits for 1974-75. Recommend dismissal of petition because Respondent has applied for permits for the signs.
75-000288  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. DUNES OF PANAMA  (1975)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 19, 1975
Whether Respondent had violated Section 479.07(1), Florida statutes, in that no permits were secured for subject sign for the years 1974 and 1975.Respondent didn't get permits for signs for years. Recommend removal of signs unless Respondent either removes or permits them.
75-000290  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. CAPTAIN ANDERSONS FLEET  (1975)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 19, 1975
Whether Respondent had violated Section 479.07(1), Florida Statutes, in that no permit was secured for subject sign for the year 1975.Respondent owned unpermitted sign. Recommend removal unless proper permit is applied for and granted.
75-000291  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. MACK`S MOTOR COURT  (1975)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 19, 1975
Whether Respondent had violated Section 479.07(1), Florida statutes, in that no permits were secured for subject sign for the year 1975.Respondent didn't get permit for sign in 1975. Recommend removal unless Respondent gets permit or removes the sign first.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer