welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Donald Karl Rudser
Donald Karl Rudser
Donald Karl Rudser
Visitors: 32
0
Bar #120735(FL)     License for 56 years; Member in Good Standing
Jasper FL

Are you Donald Karl Rudser? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

00-002977  HAMILTON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs MARTHA LEE  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 20, 2000
The issue in this case is whether Petitioner had just or good cause to reject the Superintendent's recommendation that Respondent be re-appointed on probationary status to a one- semester teaching position as agriculture teacher.Teacher on an annual contract was recommended for a contract for an ensuing semester but the School Board, without a fair hearing, refused to award her a subsequent contract.
94-003164  JAMES FENNELL vs MO-BO ENTERPRISES, INC., AND ARMOR INSURANCE COMPANY  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 06, 1994
In this case, Petitioner (Fennell) seeks to recover money from Respondent, Mo-Bo Enterprises, Inc. (Mo-Bo), for small, super select and select cucumbers, which Fennell delivered in September 1993 to Mo-Bo, a Florida dealer in agricultural products, for sale F.O.B.Dealer in agriculture produce owes farmer overcharge for freight and accounting errors on cash advances, offset by credits to farmer not due.
91-005349  DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs JAMES ROY CREWS, D/B/A ROY'S PLACE  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 26, 1991
The issues are framed by a notice to show cause/administrative complaint brought by Petitioner against Respondent charging Respondent with violations under 561.29(1)(a) and (c) and 561.58, Florida Statutes. These alleged violations pertain to alleged drug activities on or about the premises for which Respondent holds a license issued by the Petitioner allowing Respondent to sell alcoholic beverages at that licensed premises. Respondent is also accused of maintaining the licensed premises for purposes of illegal drug activities. More particularly Respondent is held accountable for any violations associated with Sections 823.10, 893.03, 893.13(1)(a) and (f), and 893.13(2)(a)5., Florida Statutes.Drug sales by employees in bar and allowed premises to be used for drug activities by partons and employees. Sale means any form of distribution.
88-004116  GENE A. STARR vs. HAMILTON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD  (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Apr. 18, 1989
Whether the Superintendent of Hamilton County Schools recommended that the Respondent enter into a professional services contract with the Petitioner, Gene Starr?Respondent had no authority to reject superintendent's recommendation concer ning petitioner unless it had good cause; failed to prove good cause.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer