The issue in this case is whether the application of Petitioner, Kenneth Crowder, for a Florida Educator's Certificate should be denied for the reasons set forth in the Notice of Reasons issued on July 22, 2005, by Respondent, John Winn, acting in his capacity as the Commissioner of Education.Petitioner engaged in inappropriate conduct with female students and a female teacher. Such conduct demonstrates that he lacks the good moral character required of teachers. Recommend that his application for a Florida Educator`s Certificate be denied.
The issues are whether Respondent committed the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what penalty, if any, should Petitioner impose on Respondent's teaching certificate.Petitioner should revoke the teaching certificate of Respondent, who had sex with 18-year-old male student, provided student with alcohol and drugs, allowed student to share her residence, and persuaded student to drop out of school.
The issues are whether Respondent committed the act alleged in the Administrative Complaint; whether the alleged conduct constitutes violations of Subsection 1012.795(1)(c) and (i), Florida Statutes (2003), and Florida Administrative Code Rule 6B-1.006(3)(a) and (e); and, if so, what penalty, if any, should be imposed on Respondent's teaching certificate.Petitioner failed to prove that the teacher used inappropriate discipline with the student that caused the student to fall to the floor.
Whether Respondent's educator certificate should be disciplined for conduct in violation of Sections 1012.795 and 1012.796, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rule 6B-1.006 as alleged in the Administrative Complaint filed in this matter.Respondent, who is guilty of voyeurism involving teachers and a student, should have his teaching license revoked.
Whether Petitioner’s applications for a Florida Educator’s Certificate (teaching certificate) should be denied on the grounds set forth in the Notice of Reasons issued by Respondent on April 20, 2005.The circumstantial evidence did not establish that Petitioner provided the school with a fraudulent teaching certificate.
The issues are whether Respondent committed the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what penalty, if any, should Petitioner impose on Respondent's teaching certificate.Petitioner, who grabbed and kissed two eighth-grade female students, is guilty of gross immorality and failure to protect students from embarrassment and a negative education experience. Recommend revocation of certificate for two years.
The issue is whether Respondent committed the acts alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint, and if so, what discipline should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent improperly "coached" students on the 2003 FCAT. The students` accounts were not credible. Recommended that the complaint be dismissed.
Whether the Florida Educator Certificate held by Respondent, Carl Moore, should be disciplined for conduct alleged in the Administrative Complaint filed in this case by Petitioner, Jim Horne, in his capacity as Commissioner of Education.Respondent battered a female minor and failed to report the incident to the School Board. Recommend revocation of Florida Educator`s Certificate.
Whether Respondent violated Subsections 1012.795(1)(c), 1012.795(1)(f), and 1012.795(1)(i), Florida Statutes (2003),2 and Florida Administrative Code Rules 6B-1.006(3)(a), 6B-1.006(3)(e), 6B-1.006(3)(h), and 6B-1.006(4)(e), and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Department complied with the statutes and rules in issuing the Petitioner a warning letter for fuel that failed to meet standards.
The issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent’s educator's certificate should be disciplined.The evidence demonstrated that Respondent acted unprofessionally towards female colleagues and engaged in harrassment, which affected the work place and the colleagues` desire to work with Respondent. Recommended suspension with required classes.
