Leon FL Lawyers | Francine Marie Ffolkes -- eLawyers

16-006889RP ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF FLORIDA, INC.; FLORIDA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION; FLORIDA RETAIL FEDERATION, INC.; FLORIDA TRUCKING ASSOCIATION, INC.; AND NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 18, 2016

The issue to be determined in this case is whether proposed Florida Administrative Code Rule 62-4.161 of the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.The proposed rule is invalid because the agency failed to follow rulemaking requirements, there is no statutory authority for the rule, it enlarges the law implemented, and it imposes invalid regulatory costs.

13-001507 DASYAM RAJASEKHAR vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 25, 2013

The issue is whether the Respondent committed an unlawful employment practice under section 760.10, Florida Statutes (2011), by discriminating against Petitioner on the basis of his national origin, or by retaliating against him, and if so, what remedy should be ordered.Petitioner failed to prove an unlawful employment practice of discrimination on the basis of national origin or retaliation under section 760.10, Florida Statutes.

11-002953 JOSEPH GLISSON vs CITY OF TALLAHASSEE AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 13, 2011

The issue in this case is whether the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP or the Department) should allow the City of Tallahassee to revise its domestic wastewater facility permits for Thomas P. Smith Water Reclamation Facility (TPS) and Lake Bradford Road Wastewater Treatment Plant (LBR).Revisions to wastewater permits were minor and met permitting criteria.

06-002842 ANTHONY PARKINSON, MICHAEL CILURSO AND THOMAS FULLMAN vs REILY ENTERPRISES, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 07, 2006

The issue is whether the Department should issue Environmental Resource Permit and Sovereign Submerged Lands Authorization No. 43-0197751-003 to Reily.DEP properly reviewed the seawall permit under the Operating Agreement with the water management district. Petitioners do not have standing to challenge the permit. If they did, it should be denied, as impacts to possible wetlands were not assessed.

97-000803 JUDGE RAY GATLIN AND GERRA GATLIN vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 18, 1997

The issues are whether respondents’ motions to dismiss the amended petitions should be granted on the ground they were not timely filed, or whether the time limitation for filing a request for hearing was equitably tolled.Failure to provide actual notice cured by subsequent constructive notice; time limits not tolled by equitable circumstances.

06-000186 DONALD G. TUTEN vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 17, 2006

The issue in this case is whether, and what, reasonable mitigative conditions are necessary to protect the interest of the public and the environment, prior to issuing Petitioner's default permit.Respondent proved that some but not all conditions attached to the default permit were reasonable and necessary to protect the environment.

07-003151 PETER "PANAGIOTI" TSOLKAS, PALM BEACH COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, ALEXANDRIA LARSON, BONNIE BROOKS, DANNY BROOKS, AND PETER SHULZ vs GULFSTREAM NATURAL GAS SYSTEM, L.L.C. AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 12, 2007

The issue is whether the Department of Environmental Protection should issue Environmental Resource Permit No. 50- 0269698-002.The Applicant provided reasonable assurances that the proposed natural gas pipeline meets the applicable regulatory criteria. Recommend that the permit be approved.

03-000791 PEACE RIVER/MANASOTA REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2003

The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.

03-000792 CHARLOTTE COUNTY vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2003

The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.

03-000804 ALAN R. BEHRENS vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 06, 2003

The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.

Francine Marie Ffolkes