welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Frederick J. Springer
Frederick J. Springer
Frederick J. Springer
Visitors: 47
0
Bar #982164(FL)     License for 31 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Frederick J. Springer? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

19-002741BID  ABACODE, LLC AND ZEROFOX, INC. vs STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 21, 2019
Whether, when making a recommendation to award to NTT DATA, Inc., the contract resulting from Invitation to Negotiate 2019-44 Re-Bid, Social Media Monitoring, Respondent, State of Florida Department of Education ("the Department"), acted contrary to one or more governing statutes, rules, policies, or procurement specifications, or any combination thereof; and, if so, whether the intended award was clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to competition.Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the intended award was clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to the competition. Recommend award to contract as previously recommended by the Department.
18-000384BID  CALIPER SYSTEMS, INC., D/B/A CALIPER CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 22, 2018
The issue is whether, due to the nonresponsiveness or misscoring of Intervenor's proposal, Respondent's intent to award a contract to Intervenor based on its proposal submitted in response to a request for proposals known as Florida Travel Demand Modeling Software and License (RFP) is contrary to the governing statutes, rules or policies, or the RFP specifications, as provided by section 120.57(3)(f), Florida Statutes.Proposal for travel demand software nonresponsive to requirements of conversion of existing travel demand software and affordable access to consultants and free access to universities in their teaching capacity.
16-002766BID  MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. vs BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 19, 2016
Whether the decision by Respondent, Bay County, Florida, Board of County Commissioners (the “County” or the “Board”), to approve the bid proposal submitted by Intervenor, Williams Communication, Inc. (“Williams”), should be reversed in favor of granting the proposal by Petitioner, Motorola Solutions, Inc. (“Motorola”).Petitioner did not prove by a preponderance of evidence that the County's approval of the bid proposal submitted by Williams Communications should be reversed.
16-004982BID  PRINCE CONTRACTING, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 29, 2016
Whether Respondent acted contrary to the agency's governing statutes, rules, or policies or the bid specifications in its proposed decision to award Contract No. T7380 to Astaldi Construction Corporation ("Astaldi").Petitioner failed to prove that the various procedures implemented by the agency to internally manage its procurement process were unadopted rules.
14-002415  DUMP THE PUMPS, INC., ET AL., vs FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 20, 2014
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether Respondent Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority ("FKAA") is entitled to issuance, by Respondent Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"), of permit numbers 295404-018-DWC/CM ("Permit 18"), 295404-019-DWC/CM ("Permit 19"), 295404-025-DWC/CM ("Permit 25"), and 295404-027- DWC/CM ("Permit 27") (hereafter "Permits at Issue") authorizing the dryline construction of domestic wastewater collection and transmission systems in the lower Florida Keys.1/Petitioners did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondent failed to provide reasonable assurance entitling it to issuance of wastewater collection systems permits. Recommend issuance of permits.
14-002416  DUMP THE PUMPS, INC., AND JIM SKURA vs FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 20, 2014
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether Respondent Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority ("FKAA") is entitled to issuance, by Respondent Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"), of permit numbers 295404-018-DWC/CM ("Permit 18"), 295404-019-DWC/CM ("Permit 19"), 295404-025-DWC/CM ("Permit 25"), and 295404-027- DWC/CM ("Permit 27") (hereafter "Permits at Issue") authorizing the dryline construction of domestic wastewater collection and transmission systems in the lower Florida Keys.1/Petitioners did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondent failed to provide reasonable assurance entitling it to issuance of wastewater collection systems permits. Recommend issuance of permits.
14-002417  DUMP THE PUMPS, INC., AND GAIL KULIKOWSKY, AND MARGARET SCHWING vs FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 20, 2014
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether Respondent Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority ("FKAA") is entitled to issuance, by Respondent Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"), of permit numbers 295404-018-DWC/CM ("Permit 18"), 295404-019-DWC/CM ("Permit 19"), 295404-025-DWC/CM ("Permit 25"), and 295404-027- DWC/CM ("Permit 27") (hereafter "Permits at Issue") authorizing the dryline construction of domestic wastewater collection and transmission systems in the lower Florida Keys.1/Petitioners did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondent failed to provide reasonable assurance entitling it to issuance of wastewater collection systems permits. Recommend issuance of permits.
14-002420  DUMP THE PUMPS, INC., AND DEBORAH CURLEE vs FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 20, 2014
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether Respondent Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority ("FKAA") is entitled to issuance, by Respondent Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"), of permit numbers 295404-018-DWC/CM ("Permit 18"), 295404-019-DWC/CM ("Permit 19"), 295404-025-DWC/CM ("Permit 25"), and 295404-027- DWC/CM ("Permit 27") (hereafter "Permits at Issue") authorizing the dryline construction of domestic wastewater collection and transmission systems in the lower Florida Keys.1/Petitioners did not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondent failed to provide reasonable assurance entitling it to issuance of wastewater collection systems permits. Recommend issuance of permits.
13-003894BID  CUSHMAN AND WAKEFIELD OF FLORIDA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 10, 2013
Pursuant to chapter 287, Florida Statutes, and section 255.25, Florida Statutes,1/ the Department of Management Services (DMS) released an Invitation to Negotiate for a contract to provide tenant broker and real estate consulting services to the State of Florida under Invitation to Negotiate No. DMS-12/13-007 (ITN). After evaluating the replies, negotiating with five vendors, and holding public meetings, DMS posted a notice of intent to award a contract to CBRE, Inc. (CBRE) and Vertical Integration, Inc. (Vertical). At issue in this proceeding is whether DMS’s intended decision to award a contract for tenant broker and real estate consulting services to CBRE and Vertical is contrary to DMS’s governing statutes, its rules or policies, or the ITN’s specifications, or was otherwise clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioner challenged intended award of contract for tenant broker and real estate consulting services to competing vendors, but failed to prove that DMS's award decision was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious.
13-003895BID  JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 10, 2013
Pursuant to chapter 287, Florida Statutes, and section 255.25, Florida Statutes,1/ the Department of Management Services (DMS) released an Invitation to Negotiate for a contract to provide tenant broker and real estate consulting services to the State of Florida under Invitation to Negotiate No. DMS-12/13-007 (ITN). After evaluating the replies, negotiating with five vendors, and holding public meetings, DMS posted a notice of intent to award a contract to CBRE, Inc. (CBRE) and Vertical Integration, Inc. (Vertical). At issue in this proceeding is whether DMS’s intended decision to award a contract for tenant broker and real estate consulting services to CBRE and Vertical is contrary to DMS’s governing statutes, its rules or policies, or the ITN’s specifications, or was otherwise clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioner challenged intended award of contract for tenant broker and real estate consulting services to competing vendors, but failed to prove that DMS's award decision was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer