Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Gary Lynn Asbell
Gary Lynn Asbell
Visitors: 57
0
Bar #853615(FL)     License for 35 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Gary Lynn Asbell? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

03-002017PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY vs THOMAS OAKLEY MILLER, L. M. T.  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 29, 2003
(1) Whether Respondent, Thomas Oakley Miller, L. M. T., used his massage therapist-patient relationship to induce or attempt to induce Patients J. G., K. L. or J. F. to engage, or to engage or attempt to engage, Patients J. G., K. L. or J. F. in sexual activity outside the scope of practice or the scope of generally accepted examination or treatment of Patients J. G., K. L. or J. F. thereby violating Subsection 480.046(1)(o), Florida Statutes, by violating Section 480.0485, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 64B7-26.010(1), (2), and (3); (2) Whether the alleged sexual activity or attempts at sexual activity with Patients J. G., K. L. or J. F. occurred in Respondent's massage establishment, thereby violating Subsection 480.406(1)(o), Florida Statutes,1 by violating Florida Administrative Code Rules 64B7-26.010(1), (2), and (3); and (3) Whether Respondent engaged in gross or repeated malpractice or failed to practice massage with that level of care, skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably prudent massage therapist as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances when providing massage therapy to Patients J. G., K. L. or J. F., thereby violating Subsection 480.046(1)(h), Florida Statutes.Respondent, a massage therapist, used his therapist-patient relationships to attempt to induce patients to become sexually involved with him.
03-002964RX  RICHARD ALLEN FREIBERG vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF ACUPUNCTURE  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 2003
The issue is whether the following rules are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority: Florida Administrative Code Rules 64B1-2.008; 64B1-6.002(1), (4) (only the following language: "is responsible for filing provider approval applications and"), (5), (8) (only the following language: ". . .n approved"), and (10) (only the following language: "individual,"); 64B1-6.005(4); 64B1-6.006(1), (8) (only the following language: "approved"), and (11); 64B1-6.007(1) and (2); and 64B1-6.008(1) and (2).Florida Administrative Code Rules 64B1-2.008, 64B1-6.006(11), 64B1-6.007(2) and (2), 64B1-6.008(1) and (2)(e), and portions of 64B1-6.002(8), Form DOH/AP007 in Rule 64B1-6.006(1), and Form DOH/AP007 in Rule 64B1-6.006(1) are invalidated.
02-001360PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF HEARING AID SPECIALISTS vs GAGE DAVEY  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 04, 2002
The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated Subsections 484.056(1)(g) and (h), Florida Statutes (1999), respectively, by committing fraud, deceit, negligence, incompetence, or misconduct in the dispensing of a hearing aid and by failing to provide a sales receipt and other required information; and, if so, what penalty, if any, should be imposed against Respondent's license as a hearing aid specialist. (All chapter and section references are to Florida Statutes (1999) unless otherwise stated.)Hearing aid specialist who misrepresented time for obtaining a refund and switched hearing aids without telling customer is guilty of fraud and negligence and should have license revoked, fined $2000, make restitution of $3283.
02-000520PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF HEARING AID SPECIALISTS vs CRAIG SCHUETTE  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 13, 2002
The issue is whether Respondent, Craig Louis Schuette, committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaints in these cases, and if so what is the appropriate penalty to be imposed by the Petitioner.Petitioner proved that Respondent sold a number of hearing aids to consumers and failed to honor the return policy.
02-000521PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF HEARING AID SPECIALISTS vs CRAIG LOUIS SCHUETTE  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 13, 2002
The issue is whether Respondent, Craig Louis Schuette, committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaints in these cases, and if so what is the appropriate penalty to be imposed by the Petitioner.Petitioner proved that Respondent sold a number of hearing aids to consumers and failed to honor the return policy.
02-000522PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF HEARING AID SPECIALISTS vs CRAIG SCHUETTE  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 13, 2002
The issue is whether Respondent, Craig Louis Schuette, committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaints in these cases, and if so what is the appropriate penalty to be imposed by the Petitioner.Petitioner proved that Respondent sold a number of hearing aids to consumers and failed to honor the return policy.
02-000220PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF HEARING AID SPECIALISTS vs GARY P. SEGRETARIO  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 2002
The issue presented in this case is whether Respondent, Gary Segretario, committed the violations alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed by Petitioner.Petitioner failed to prove Respondent violated 30-day refund requirement; recommend dismissal of Administrative Complaint.
02-000221PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF HEARING AID SPECIALISTS vs WILLIAM WILLISTON  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 2002
Should Petitioner discipline Respondent's hearing aid specialist license for reasons alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint?Respondent failed to provide statutory written notice concerning a guarantee for purchases of hearing aids.
01-000321PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY vs JAMES WHITED, JR.  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 24, 2001
Where no intent to deceive licensing board by failing to disclose a prior misdemeanor conviction, which applicant was unaware of, complaint dismissed.
01-000226PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF HEARING AID SPECIALISTS vs LEONARD P. ZINNI  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 17, 2001
Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him.Contrary to allegations in Administrative Complaint, hearing aid specialist did not violate Sections 484.0501(1)(a), 484.0501(4), or 484.0512(1), Florida Statutes.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer