welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Irene M Kennedy Quincey
Irene M Kennedy Quincey
Irene M Kennedy Quincey
Visitors: 61
0
Bar #267597(FL)     License for 46 years; Member in Good Standing
West Palm Beach FL

Are you Irene M Kennedy Quincey? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

12-002811  FLORIDA AUDUBON SOCIETY vs SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA, UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, SUGAR FARMS CO-OP, AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 17, 2012
The issue to be determined in this case is whether Respondents, United States Sugar Corporation (“USSC”), Sugar Farms Co-op (“SFC”), and Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida (“SCGC”) (collectively “the Applicants”) are entitled to the Everglades Works of the District permits (“WOD Permits”), issued to them by the South Florida Water Management District (“District”).Petitioner failed to prove that the Applicants are not entitled to the Works of the District permits in the Everglades Agricultural Area.
82-001639  STRAZZULLA BROTHERS, INC. vs. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 21, 1991
Petitioner's application for surface water management permit denied for failure to abide by the statutory and rule guidelines.
82-002235  FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION vs. GORDON V. LEGGETT, MOSELEY COLLINS, ET AL.  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 21, 1991
Whether the applicants own the property in question? Whether the project would comply with the criteria of the South Florida Water Management District contained in Basis of Review for Surface Water Management Systems, specifically Sections 3.1.3 and 3.2? Whether flood protection would be inadequate or septic tanks unsuitable or whether the public health and safety would be compromised or the ultimate purchasers be deprived of usage of the property due to inundation in violation of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes (1981), or Rule 40E-4.301(1), Florida Administrative Code?Petition seeking review of water management proposed acceptance of application for permit approved and permit denied where Petitioner proved adverse impact.
83-000082  WILLIAM H. AND PATRICIA H. MELLOR, ET AL. vs. COUNTY LINE DRAINAGE DISTRICT AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (1983)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 21, 1991
Application for permit to use works and lands of district should be granted. Evidence showed rules reasonably assured to be met.
82-001937  CALOOSA PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. vs. CALEFFE INVESTMENT, LTD.; WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES; ET AL.  (1982)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 21, 1991
The ultimate issue to be resolved in this proceeding is whether the applicants have offered reasonable assurance that their proposed surface water management system for the Palm Beach Park of Commerce would operate within the rules of SFWMD set out at Section 40E-4.301, Florida Administrative Code. The Petitioners specifically contend that the project as proposed would cause flooding on lands adjacent to the project, would have adverse impacts on surface and ground waters, and otherwise is inconsistent with SFWMD criteria. Applicants and SFWMD contend that the project meets applicable standards.Grant conditional approval for Palm Beach Park of Commerce (PBPC) imposing twelve separate conditions on the construction/maintenance to Ensure safe drinking water.
81-001429  RANGER CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES, INC. vs. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (1981)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Mar. 03, 1982
Petitioner's permit to withdraw water from old quarry is allowable subject to conditions.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer