welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. James Arthur Bossart Jr.
James Arthur Bossart Jr.
James Arthur Bossart Jr.
Visitors: 73
0
Bar #374598(FL)     License for 42 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you James Arthur Bossart Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

13-003214F  WILLIAM P. MCCLOSKEY vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 22, 2013
The issue in this case is whether the Petitioner is entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to section 57.111, Florida Statutes (2011).1/Agency action substantially justified.
15-007354  ALEJANDRO JAVIER FRIGULS vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 30, 2015
Whether the Department of Financial Services should issue Petitioner, Alejandro Javier Friguls (“Petitioner”), a license as a resident personal lines insurance agent.Petitioner proved that the Department should not have denied his application for licensure either by applying the statutory disqualifying period or exercising its discretion.
14-004133PL  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs MICHAEL PAUL MATTHIAS  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 04, 2014
The issues are whether Respondent violated provisions of chapter 626, Florida Statutes, regulating insurance agents in Florida, as set forth in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, what sanction is appropriate.Respondent collected premiums for liability insurance policies, but never remitted some funds to the insurance company, in violation of provisions of chapter 626, Florida Statutes, and his license should be suspended for a period of nine months.
11-003982PL  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs WILLIAM P. MCCLOSKEY  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2011
The issues in this case are whether Respondent violated sections 626.611(7), 626.611(9), 626.611(16), 626.621(2), 626.621(6), 626.9541(1)(e)1., 626.9927(1), 626.99275(1)(b), and 626.99277(6), Florida Statutes (2003),1/ and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Insurance agent sold viaticals, which were not registered as securities.
11-000876F  JUDITH C. CLEARY vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 18, 2011
The issue is whether Petitioners, Judith C. Cleary and Charles B. Houck (Petitioners or Ms. Cleary and Mr. Houck), are entitled to an award of attorney's fees against Respondent, Department of Financial Services (Respondent or the Department), pursuant to section 57.111, Florida Statutes (2009).1/Respondent was substantially justified in initiating disciplinary actions against Petitioners; petitions for attorney's fees and costs are denied.
11-000877F  CHARLES B. HOUCK vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 18, 2011
The issue is whether Petitioners, Judith C. Cleary and Charles B. Houck (Petitioners or Ms. Cleary and Mr. Houck), are entitled to an award of attorney's fees against Respondent, Department of Financial Services (Respondent or the Department), pursuant to section 57.111, Florida Statutes (2009).1/Respondent was substantially justified in initiating disciplinary actions against Petitioners; petitions for attorney's fees and costs are denied.
10-001504PL  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs JUDITH C. CLEARY  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 19, 2010
The issues in this case are whether Respondents violated various provisions in Sections 626.611, 626.621, and 626.9541, Florida Statutes (2006),1 as charged in the Administrative Complaints, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove Respondents misrepresented or materially ommitted information in connection with selling annuities to two related clients. Recommend that the Administrative Complaint be dismissed.
10-001505PL  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs CHARLES B. HOUCK  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 19, 2010
The issues in this case are whether Respondents violated various provisions in Sections 626.611, 626.621, and 626.9541, Florida Statutes (2006),1 as charged in the Administrative Complaints, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove Respondents misrepresented or materially ommitted information in connection with selling annuities to two related clients. Recommend that the Administrative Complaint be dismissed.
10-002442  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs ADALBERTO LUIS SOTERO AND FALCONTRUST GROUP, INC.  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 06, 2010
Does Petitioner, Department of Financial Services (DFS), have authority to determine if Respondent, Alberto Luis Sotero (Mr. Sotero) and Respondent, FalconTrust Group, Inc. (FalconTrust), wrongfully took or witheld premium funds owed an insurance company while a civil action between the insurance company and Mr. Sotero and FalconTrust pends in Circuit Court presenting the same issues? Should the insurance agent license of Mr. Sotero be disciplined for alleged violations of Sections 626.561(1), 626.611(7), 626.611(10), 626.611(13), and 626.621(4), Florida Statutes (2007)?1. Should the insurance agency license of FalconTrust be disciplined for alleged violations of Section 626.561(1), 626.6215(5)(a), 626.6215(5)(d). 626.6215(5)(f), and 626.6215(5)(k), Florida Statutes?Insurance agent and agency took premiums to pay commissions held back by insurance company. Pending civil suit did not prevent administrative decision interpreting Agency Agreement; taking the premiums violated several insurance code provisions.
10-002443  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs FALCONTRUST GROUP, INC.  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 06, 2010
Does Petitioner, Department of Financial Services (DFS), have authority to determine if Respondent, Alberto Luis Sotero (Mr. Sotero) and Respondent, FalconTrust Group, Inc. (FalconTrust), wrongfully took or witheld premium funds owed an insurance company while a civil action between the insurance company and Mr. Sotero and FalconTrust pends in Circuit Court presenting the same issues? Should the insurance agent license of Mr. Sotero be disciplined for alleged violations of Sections 626.561(1), 626.611(7), 626.611(10), 626.611(13), and 626.621(4), Florida Statutes (2007)?1. Should the insurance agency license of FalconTrust be disciplined for alleged violations of Section 626.561(1), 626.6215(5)(a), 626.6215(5)(d). 626.6215(5)(f), and 626.6215(5)(k), Florida Statutes?Insurance agent and agency took premiums to pay commissions held back by insurance company. Pending civil suit did not prevent administrative decision interpreting Agency Agreement; taking the premiums violated several insurance code provisions.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer