Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
James Fortunas
James Fortunas
Visitors: 53
0
Bar #21635(FL)     License for 19 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you James Fortunas? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 18 U.S.C 371

CFR: 47 CFR 64

Florida Laws: 120.569120.57120.574120.6817.00117.00220.165287.012287.057455.2273489.105489.119489.12956.25

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.217

14-002828BID  CENTURYLINK PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., D/B/A CENTURY LINK vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 18, 2014
Is Respondent, Department of Corrections' (Department), Notice of Intent to Award DC RFP-13-031 for Statewide Inmate Telecommunication Services to Intervenor, Global Tel*Link Corporation (Global), contrary to the governing statutes, rules, or policies or to the Department's Request for Proposal solicitation specifications?RFP did not require labeled subsections. Agency arbitrarily ranked responses not marked by subsection s omitted. Allowing 2 bidders to exclude commissions from blended rate when RFP said they must be included was arbitrary and capricious.
14-002894BID  SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 18, 2014
Is Respondent, Department of Corrections' (Department), Notice of Intent to Award DC RFP-13-031 for Statewide Inmate Telecommunication Services to Intervenor, Global Tel*Link Corporation (Global), contrary to the governing statutes, rules, or policies or to the Department's Request for Proposal solicitation specifications?RFP did not require labeled subsections. Agency arbitrarily ranked responses not marked by subsection s omitted. Allowing 2 bidders to exclude commissions from blended rate when RFP said they must be included was arbitrary and capricious.
14-000985BID  KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, L.L.C. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2014
Whether the Florida Department of Corrections’ (Department) intended decision to award Trinity Services Group, Inc. (Trinity) with a contract for Statewide Canteen Operations under Invitation to Bid, DOC ITB-13-015 (ITB), is contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules or policies, or the bid specifications.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent acted contraty to its governing statutes, rules or policies, or the bid specifications.
13-003028BID  GLOBAL TEL LINK CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 2013
Whether the Department of Corrections? action to withdraw its Intent to Award and to reject all replies to ITN 12-DC-8396 is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent, and if so, whether its Intent to Award is contrary to governing statutes, rules, policies, or the solicitation specifications.Petitioners failed to prove that the Department's rejection of all replies due to unclear criteria for award is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent.
13-003029BID  EMBARQ PAYPHONE SERVICES, INC., D/B/A CENTURYLINK vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 2013
Whether the Department of Corrections? action to withdraw its Intent to Award and to reject all replies to ITN 12-DC-8396 is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent, and if so, whether its Intent to Award is contrary to governing statutes, rules, policies, or the solicitation specifications.Petitioners failed to prove that the Department's rejection of all replies due to unclear criteria for award is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent.
13-003030BID  SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 2013
Whether the Department of Corrections? action to withdraw its Intent to Award and to reject all replies to ITN 12-DC-8396 is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent, and if so, whether its Intent to Award is contrary to governing statutes, rules, policies, or the solicitation specifications.Petitioners failed to prove that the Department's rejection of all replies due to unclear criteria for award is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent.
13-003041BID  GLOBAL TEL LINK CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 2013
Whether the Department of Corrections? action to withdraw its Intent to Award and to reject all replies to ITN 12-DC-8396 is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent, and if so, whether its Intent to Award is contrary to governing statutes, rules, policies, or the solicitation specifications.Petitioners failed to prove that the Department's rejection of all replies due to unclear criteria for award is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent.
12-001970PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs LARRY M. PROVENCAL  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 01, 2012
The issue to be determined is whether Respondent violated section 489.129(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), by being convicted or found guilty of, or entering a plea of nolo contendere to, regardless of adjudication, a crime directly related to the practice or the ability to practice contracting. If so, it must also be determined what penalty should be imposed for the violation.Respondent's guilty plea to conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud is directly related to contracting. Two-year suspension, three-year probation and $5000 fine imposed.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer