Miami-Dade FL Lawyers | James Harrell Greason -- eLawyers

James Harrell Greason

Visitors: 35

305-582-9158

Bar #247911(FL) License for 47 years

Miami FL

Are you James Harrell Greason? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

19-10888 Pilar Tovar (2000)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Jan. 20, 2000 Citations: 244 B.R. 480

244 B.R. 480 (2000) In re Melvyn M. BAEZ and Jessica J. Baez, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 99-16396-BKC-AJC. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. January 20, 2000. Nancy N. Herkert, Hialeah, FL, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee. Timothy S. Kingcade, Miami, FL, for debtors. Amy McGrotty, P.A., North Miami Beach, FL, for FirstPlus Financial, Inc. Enrico G. Gonzalez, Temple Terrace, FL, for Household Finance Corp. III. ORDER (i) VACATING JANUARY 10, 2000 ORDER ON CONTESTED CONFIRMATIO..

18-000513FEC FLORIDA ELECTIONS COMMISSION vs JOHN B. RILEY (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 31, 2018

Whether Respondent, John B. Riley ("Respondent"), willfully violated sections 106.11(4) and 106.19(1)(d), Florida Statutes (2016), with regard to a check drawn on his campaign account in the amount of $316.00, made payable to the City of Opa-Locka, without sufficient funds on deposit to pay the $316.00 fee to run in a special election for a seat on the City of Opa-Locka City Commission; or willfully violated section 106.07(5) and willfully and knowingly violated section 106.19(1)(c), with regard to accurately reporting information on his September 12, 2016, M8 Campaign Treasurer's Report ("M8 Report"); and, if so, what civil penalties are appropriate.FEC failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent willfully violated campaign finance laws with regard to submission of filing fee check, which was returned for insufficient funds and filing of M8 treasury report.

07-001082 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES vs ST. MICHAEL`S ACADEMY, INC. (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 06, 2007

Whether Respondent, in November 2006, violated child care facility licensing standards relating to supervision set forth in Florida Administrative Code Rule 65C-22.001(5), as alleged by the Department of Children and Family Services (Department) in its December 15, 2006, letter to Respondent. If so, whether Respondent should be fined $1,000.00 for this violation, as proposed by the Department in the aforesaid December 15, 2006, letter.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent was guilty of inadequate supervision in connection with an injury suffered at the facility.

01-001820EC IN RE: TIMOTHY HOLMES vs * (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 09, 2001

Whether the Respondent, Timothy Holmes, violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by making personal, long distance telephone calls at the expense of the City of Opa Locka, and, if so, what penalty is appropriate.Respondent improperly used public property for private gain.

98-000370EC IN RE: WELLINGTON ROLLE vs * (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 15, 1998

The issues for determination are: (1) whether Respondent Wellington Rolle, as the former Director of Personnel for the City of Opa-Locka (City of Opa-Locka or City), violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by using his position to seek from the City payment to which he was not entitled; and (2) whether Respondent John Riley, as the former Assistant City Manager of the City of Opa- Locka, violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by using his position to seek from the City payment to which he was not entitled; and (3) if so, what penalty is appropriate.No corrupt intent shown where assistants to city manager signed personnel forms that resulted in their receiving retroactive salary payments. Assistants had performed work for which they were compensated.

92-001647EC IN RE: ROBERT B. INGRAM vs * (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 13, 1992

The issue for disposition is whether the individuals styled as Respondents above are entitled to costs and attorney's fees from Timothy Holmes. This requires a determination of whether Timothy Holmes' complaint to the Commission on Ethics regarding the three respondents was filed with a malicious intent to injure their reputations and was frivolous and without basis in law or fact, as provided in Section 112.317(8), Florida Statutes.Fees denied for failure to prove malicious intent. Complainant relied in good faith on own perception and statement of former city employee.