welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. James Timothy Schulte
James Timothy Schulte
James Timothy Schulte
Visitors: 45
0
Bar #769169(FL)     License for 37 years
Orlando FL

Are you James Timothy Schulte? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

18-001558BID  MADISON HIGHLANDS, LLC, AND AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 26, 2018
The issue is whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (Florida Housing) intended decision on January 29, 2016, to award low-income housing tax credits for an affordable housing development in Hillsborough County pursuant to Request for Applications 2015-107 (RFA-107) was contrary to Florida Housing’s rules, policies, or solicitation specifications; and, if so, whether that determination was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioners failed to prove that Florida Housing's intended award of tax credits violated section 120.57(3)(f).
17-003270BID  MADISON POINT, LLC AND AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 07, 2017
The issue for determination in this bid protest proceeding is whether the Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (“Florida Housing”) intended award of tax credits for the preservation of existing affordable housing developments was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Intervenor's exclusion of existing, occupied units on the proposed development site constituted a material non-waivable error; tax credits should be awarded to Petitioners.
20-001779BID  MADISON SQUARE, LLC AND ARC 2019, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 09, 2020
Whether Respondent, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s ("Florida Housing") intended action to award housing tax credit funding to Intervenors Westside Phase, I, LLLP ("Westside"), HTG Edgewood, Ltd. ("HTG Edgewood"), Diplomat South, LLC ("Diplomat"), and Tranquility at Milton, LLC ("Tranquility"), under Request for Applications 2019-113 Housing Credit Financing for Affordable Housing Developments Located in Medium and Small Counties (the "RFA"), is contrary to governing statutes, rules, the RFA specifications, and clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioners HTG Addison and Madison Oaks failed to prove that Florida Housing's determination of eligibility and intended award of tax credits were contrary to statutes, rules, the RFA, clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious.
20-001780BID  MADISON OAKS EAST, LLC, AND ARC 2019, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 09, 2020
Whether Respondent, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s ("Florida Housing") intended action to award housing tax credit funding to Intervenors Westside Phase, I, LLLP ("Westside"), HTG Edgewood, Ltd. ("HTG Edgewood"), Diplomat South, LLC ("Diplomat"), and Tranquility at Milton, LLC ("Tranquility"), under Request for Applications 2019-113 Housing Credit Financing for Affordable Housing Developments Located in Medium and Small Counties (the "RFA"), is contrary to governing statutes, rules, the RFA specifications, and clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioners HTG Addison and Madison Oaks failed to prove that Florida Housing's determination of eligibility and intended award of tax credits were contrary to statutes, rules, the RFA, clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious.
21-000146BID  MADISON LANDING II, LLC AND ARC 2020, LLC AND NEW SOUTH RESIDENTIAL, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 13, 2021
The issue in this case is whether Florida Housing's proposed action to deem Madison Landing eligible for an award of housing tax credit funds, as contemplated under Request for Applications 2020-202 Housing Credit Financing for Affordable Housing Developments Located in Broward, Duval, Hillsborough, Orange, Palm Beach and Pinellas Counties ("the 2020 RFA"), is contrary to governing statutes, rules or policies, or the 2020 RFA specifications. The standard of proof is whether Florida Housing's proposed action is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Florida Housing’s proposed action to deem Madison Landing eligible for an award of housing tax credit funds, as contemplated under a Request for Applications, was not clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.
21-000516BID  MADISON GROVE, LLC AND ARC 2020, LLC AND NEW SOUTH RESIDENTIAL, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2021
The issues to be determined are whether, with respect to each application filed, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (Florida Housing) review and decision-making process in response to the Request for Applications 2020-201 (RFA) was contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, the agency’s rules or policies, or the RFA.Florida Housing's determination that two applicants demonstrated committed funding from the same jurisdiction was clearly erroneous; determination that errors in another application were a minor waivable irregularity was supported by evidence.
21-000517BID  MADISON OAKS EAST, LLC AND ARC 2020, LLC AND NEW SOUTH RESIDENTIAL, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2021
The issues to be determined are whether, with respect to each application filed, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (Florida Housing) review and decision-making process in response to the Request for Applications 2020-201 (RFA) was contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, the agency’s rules or policies, or the RFA.Florida Housing's determination that two applicants demonstrated committed funding from the same jurisdiction was clearly erroneous; determination that errors in another application were a minor waivable irregularity was supported by evidence.
21-000518BID  MADISON OAKS WEST, LLC AND ARC 2020, LLC AND NEW SOUTH RESIDENTIAL, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2021
The issues to be determined are whether, with respect to each application filed, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (Florida Housing) review and decision-making process in response to the Request for Applications 2020-201 (RFA) was contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, the agency’s rules or policies, or the RFA.Florida Housing's determination that two applicants demonstrated committed funding from the same jurisdiction was clearly erroneous; determination that errors in another application were a minor waivable irregularity was supported by evidence.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer