Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Jennifer Leigh Blakeman
Jennifer Leigh Blakeman
Visitors: 263
0
Bar #506877(FL)     License for 24 years
Orlando FL

Are you Jennifer Leigh Blakeman? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

12-001537PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs RICHARD PATRICK TRUHAN  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 25, 2012
The issues are essentially whether Respondent failed to use reasonable diligence on four appraisals of residential condominiums in Orlando done in 2007, and whether he failed to register his appraisal business with Petitioner; and, if so, how he should be disciplined.Real estate appraiser used inappropriate comparables, did not use reasonable diligence, and arrived at unreasonably high value conclusions.
12-001538PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs RICHARD PATRICK TRUHAN  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 25, 2012
The issues are essentially whether Respondent failed to use reasonable diligence on four appraisals of residential condominiums in Orlando done in 2007, and whether he failed to register his appraisal business with Petitioner; and, if so, how he should be disciplined.Real estate appraiser used inappropriate comparables, did not use reasonable diligence, and arrived at unreasonably high value conclusions.
12-001539PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs RICHARD PATRICK TRUHAN  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 25, 2012
The issues are essentially whether Respondent failed to use reasonable diligence on four appraisals of residential condominiums in Orlando done in 2007, and whether he failed to register his appraisal business with Petitioner; and, if so, how he should be disciplined.Real estate appraiser used inappropriate comparables, did not use reasonable diligence, and arrived at unreasonably high value conclusions.
12-001541PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs RICHARD PATRICK TRUHAN  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 25, 2012
The issues are essentially whether Respondent failed to use reasonable diligence on four appraisals of residential condominiums in Orlando done in 2007, and whether he failed to register his appraisal business with Petitioner; and, if so, how he should be disciplined.Real estate appraiser used inappropriate comparables, did not use reasonable diligence, and arrived at unreasonably high value conclusions.
11-006007F  VICTOR JESUS MONZON vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 22, 2011
Whether Petitioner, Victor Jesus Monzon (Mr. Monzon), should be awarded attorney's fees and costs pursuant to section 57.111, Florida Statutes (2011). Because of a stipulation reached by the parties, the only issues are (1) whether Mr. Monzon qualified as a "small business party," and (2) whether the Department of Business and Professional Regulation (the Department) was "substantially justified" in initiating the disciplinary proceedings against Mr. Monzon that culminated in DOAH Case No. 10-9926PL.Costs and fees denied because agency was substantially justified in bring administrative complaint and because petitioner failed to prove his status as a small business party.
10-000387  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs CARA S. CACIOPPO  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 26, 2010
The issues are as follows: (a) whether Respondent acted as a real estate agent/sales associate without being the holder of a valid and current real estate license in violation of Section 475.42(1)(a), Florida Statutes, and therefore, in violation of Section 455.228, Florida Statutes; and, if so, (b) what penalty should be imposed.Respondent is not guilty of acting as an unlicensed real estate agent/sales associate.
09-002995PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs GREGORY JOHN OWEN  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 01, 2009
Whether Respondent, Gregory John Owen, committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Respondent was found not guilty of allegations on four counts of real estate violations.
10-005606PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs GAYLE GOTTFRIED  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 15, 2010
Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent hindered investigation by belatedly providing appraisal logs, nor did Petitioner demonstrate that Respondent failed to maintain appraisal work file. Recommend dismissal of Administrative Complaint.
10-005607PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs GAYLE GOTTFRIED  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 15, 2010
Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent hindered or obstructed investigation. Petitioner also failed to demonstrate that Respondent failed to maintain appraisal work file. Recommend dismissal of Administrative Complaint.
10-000389PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs HERIBERTO ALONSO  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 26, 2010
The issue in this case is whether Respondent, Heriberto Alonso, violated Section 475.25(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2005- 2006), as alleged in a one-count Administrative Complaint filed with the Petitioner, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against his Florida real estate associate license.Respondent found guilty of "concealment" for failing to inform sellers of properties that selling price had been increased significantly over their asking price and agreed-contract price.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer