welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Joanna Daniels
Joanna Daniels
Joanna Daniels
Visitors: 97
0
Bar #118321(FL)     License for 28 years; Member in Good Standing
Lealman FL

Are you Joanna Daniels? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

CFR: 42 CFR 481.13, 42 CFR 481.13, 42 CFR 481.13, 42 CFR 483, 42 CFR 483 .25, 42 CFR 483.25, 42 CFR 483.75, 42 CFR 483.75, 42 CFR 483.75, 42 CFR 483.75, 42 CFR 483.75, 42 CFR 483.75, 42 CFR 483.75

Florida Laws: 11.242, 11.2421, 11.2422, 11.2423, 11.2424, 120.52, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.68, 194.171, 20.04, 20.05, 20.42, 39.001, 395.4001, 400.021, 400.022, 400.102, 400.121, 400.19, 400.23, 400.235, 408.035, 415.102, 415.103, 415.1034, 415.111, 415.1111, 440.015, 440.02, 440.125, 440.13, 440.192, 440.20, 440.44, 518.01, 57.105, 574.08, 689.25, 75.01, 90.801, 90.956

05-002257  FCCI INSURANCE GROUP vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 21, 2005
The issue for determination is whether Intervenors are entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to Section 120.595, Florida Statutes (2003).1Petitioner did not participate for an improper purpose by reducing the amount of hospital reimbursement, requesting a hearing, or challenging Respondent`s interpretation and enforcement of a rule promulagated by the Department of Financial Services.
05-000926  HUBERTO E. MERAYO vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 10, 2005
Whether Petitioner, a health care provider, filed a timely, valid petition with Respondent to challenge Intervenors’ disallowance of payment for certain dates of service to a workers’ compensation claimant.The correspondence from a workers` compensation provider was not a valid petition for Respondent to resolve a reimbursement dispute with the carrier.
04-003860  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs DELTA HEALTH GROUP, INC.,D/B/A WINDSOR MANOR  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 26, 2004
The primary issue for determination is whether Windsor Manor (Respondent) committed the deficiencies as alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint dated September 29, 2004. Secondary issues include whether Petitioner should have changed the status of Respondent's license from Standard to Conditional for the time period of April 30, 2004 until June 7, 2004; and whether Petitioner should impose administrative fines for alleged deficiencies that are proven to be supported by the evidence.Petitioner failed to prove allegations of improper care of a resident. Recommend that the Administrative Complaint be dismissed and that the "conditional" license status be removed.
02-004442  PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES, INC., D/B/A WESTMINISTER TOWERS vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 18, 2002
Whether Petitioner, Presbyterian Retirement Communities, Inc., d/b/a Westminster Towers: (1) should be given a "conditional" or "standard" license effective June 17, 2002; and whether Petitioner is subject to an administrative fine of $2,500.Respondent, Agency for Health Care Administration, failed to prove that Petitioner failed to provide appropriate treatment; Class II deficiency not proved. Standard license restored; no fine.
03-000192  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs ENGLEWOOD HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, LLC, D/B/A ENGLEWOOD HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 17, 2003
The issue in these cases is whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaints filed by the Petitioner against the Respondent are correct, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Facility practice related to tobacco use by residents does not constitute a Class I violation.
03-000193  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs ENGLEWOOD HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, LLC, D/B/A ENGLEWOOD HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 17, 2003
The issue in these cases is whether the allegations of the Administrative Complaints filed by the Petitioner against the Respondent are correct, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Facility practice related to tobacco use by residents does not constitute a Class I violation.
02-003858  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs DELTA HEALTH GROUP, INC., D/B/A BAYSIDE MANOR  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 02, 2002
Whether Respondent’s nursing home license should be disciplined, and whether Respondent’s nursing home license should be changed from a Standard license to a Conditional license.Evidence showed only one violation remained uncorrected; RO discusses meaning of "work schedule" in rules; $500 fine for staff not certified to assist with medications; good faith efforts to comply.
02-003848  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs BRADENTON HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES, LLC, D/B/A BRADENTON HEALTH CARE  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 02, 2002
The issue is whether the deficiencies cited by the Agency for Health Care Administration during its survey of Respondent's facility in March 2002, justify the imposition of a conditional license and/or the assessment of fines and costs against Respondent.Agency failed to prove deficiencies at nursing home based upon sexually inappropriate behavior of demented resident. No justification for conditional license, fines, six-month survey cycle, or fees and costs.
02-003950  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs ROCKLEDGE NH, L.L.C., D/B/A ROCKLEDGE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 11, 2002
(1) Whether Respondent, Rockledge NH, L.L.C., d/b/a Rockledge Health and Rehabilitation Center, should be given a "Conditional" or "Standard" license effective February 12, 2002, or March 7, 2002; (2) Whether Respondent is subject to an administrative fine in the amount of $2,500.Certified nursing assistant reported suspected abuse 48 hours after discovery; institution improperly charged with failure to make mandatory, immediate report to the Department of Children and Family Services abuse hotline.
02-003951  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs ROCKLEDGE NH, L.L.C., D/B/A ROCKLEDGE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 11, 2002
(1) Whether Respondent, Rockledge NH, L.L.C., d/b/a Rockledge Health and Rehabilitation Center, should be given a "Conditional" or "Standard" license effective February 12, 2002, or March 7, 2002; (2) Whether Respondent is subject to an administrative fine in the amount of $2,500.Certified nursing assistant reported suspected abuse 48 hours after discovery; institution improperly charged with failure to make mandatory, immediate report to the Department of Children and Family Services abuse hotline.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer