welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. John Stephen Menton
John Stephen Menton
John Stephen Menton
Visitors: 231
0
Bar #331181(FL)     License for 44 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you John Stephen Menton? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

18-000068CON  MARION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A WEST MARION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND OCALA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND FLORIDA HOSPITAL WATERMAN, INC., D/B/A FLORIDA HOSPITAL WATERMAN  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 2018
Should the Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency) approve Certificate of Need (CON) Application No. 10499 of Marion Community Hospital, Inc. (Marion Community), d/b/a West Marion Community Hospital (West Marion), to add 12 comprehensive medical rehabilitation (CMR) beds to its facility? Should the Agency approve CON Application No. 10496 of Florida Hospital Waterman, Inc. (Waterman), to add 12 CMR beds to its facility?Waterman Hosp., Lake Co., better for "needed" 12-bed CMR unit. Not normal circumstances proved need for two 12-bed CMR units, one in Lake Co. and one in Marion Co. Not normal argument was not an application amendment.
18-000075CON  FLORIDA HOSPITAL WATERMAN, INC., D/B/A FLORIDA HOSPITAL WATERMAN vs MARION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC.  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 2018
Should the Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency) approve Certificate of Need (CON) Application No. 10499 of Marion Community Hospital, Inc. (Marion Community), d/b/a West Marion Community Hospital (West Marion), to add 12 comprehensive medical rehabilitation (CMR) beds to its facility? Should the Agency approve CON Application No. 10496 of Florida Hospital Waterman, Inc. (Waterman), to add 12 CMR beds to its facility?Waterman Hosp., Lake Co., better for "needed" 12-bed CMR unit. Not normal circumstances proved need for two 12-bed CMR units, one in Lake Co and one in Marion Co. Not normal argument was not an application amendment.
16-005837RP  SHANDS JACKSONVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., D/B/A UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Whether proposed rules 64J-2.010, 64J-2.012, 64J-2.013, and 64J-2.016 of the Florida Administrative Code (“the Proposed Rules”) are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes (2016).1/Petitioners demonstrated that the Proposed Rules contravene chapter 395, Florida Statutes.
16-005838RP  FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, INC., D/B/A TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Whether proposed rules 64J-2.010, 64J-2.012, 64J-2.013, and 64J-2.016 of the Florida Administrative Code (“the Proposed Rules”) are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes (2016).1/Petitioners demonstrated that the Proposed Rules contravene chapter 395, Florida Statutes.
16-005839RP  LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM, D/B/A LEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Whether proposed rules 64J-2.010, 64J-2.012, 64J-2.013, and 64J-2.016 of the Florida Administrative Code (“the Proposed Rules”) are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes (2016).1/Petitioners demonstrated that the Proposed Rules contravene chapter 395, Florida Statutes.
16-005840RP  BAYFRONT HMA MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, D/B/A BAYFRONT HEALTH - ST. PETERSBURG vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Whether proposed rules 64J-2.010, 64J-2.012, 64J-2.013, and 64J-2.016 of the Florida Administrative Code (“the Proposed Rules”) are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes (2016).1/Petitioners demonstrated that the Proposed Rules contravene chapter 395, Florida Statutes.
16-005841RP  ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 06, 2016
Whether proposed rules 64J-2.010, 64J-2.012, 64J-2.013, and 64J-2.016 of the Florida Administrative Code (“the Proposed Rules”) are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes (2016).1/Petitioners demonstrated that the Proposed Rules contravene chapter 395, Florida Statutes.
16-004128RU  FLORIDA QUARTER HORSE RACING ASSOCIATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 22, 2016
Whether Respondent, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering (“Division”), relied on an unadopted rule when it issued a 2016-2017 annual operating license and cardroom license to the South Florida Racing Association, LLC, d/b/a Hialeah Park (“Hialeah”), and continued to authorize slot machine operations at Hialeah beyond June 30, 2016.Agency's disregard of statutory application deadline and/or submission requirements was an unadopted rule.
17-000554CON  MARION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A OCALA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER; CITRUS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A CITRUS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; AND MARION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A WEST MARION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL vs MUNROE HMA HOSPITAL, LLC, D/B/A MUNROE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AND AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 23, 2017
This proceeding involves Certificate of Need (“CON”) application number 10449, submitted to the Agency by Munroe Regional, seeking to establish a 66-bed general acute care hospital in Marion County, Florida, District 3, Subdistrict 3-4. The nature of the controversy is whether, on balance, the CON application satisfies the applicable statutory and rule criteria and should be approved.Petitioners proved by a preponderance of evidence that the Certificate of Need requested by Munroe Regional should not be approved.
17-001543BID  JOE MORETTI PHASE THREE, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 14, 2017
The issue for determination in this consolidated bid protest proceeding is whether the Florida Housing Finance Corporation (“Florida Housing”) acted arbitrarily, capriciously, or contrary to competition by deeming the applications of Joe Moretti Phase Three, LLC. (“Moretti Phase Three”) and Stirrup Plaza Phase Three, LLC. (“Stirrup Plaza Phase Three”) ineligible for Request for Applications 2016-114, Housing Credit Financing for Affordable Housing Developments Located in Miami-Dade County (“RFA 2016-114”).Petitioners failed to demonstrate that Florida Housing's actions regarding their requests to amend Extended Use Agreements were arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to competition.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer