Duval FL Consumer protection and Probate Lawyers | Joseph W. -- eLawyers

8:10-bk-19731-MGW In Re Young (2010)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Sep. 28, 2010 Citations: 439 B.R. 211

439 B.R. 211 (2010) In re Cledus J. YOUNG, Debtor. No. 8:10-bk-19731-MGW. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. September 28, 2010. *213 Christopher A. Ewbank, Esquire, Allan C. Ewbank, PA, Tampa, FL, for Debtor. Keith T. Appleby, Esquire, Fowler White Boggs PA, Tampa, FL, for Bank. ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING DEBTOR'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY MICHAEL G. WILLIAMSON, Bankruptcy Judge. On the date of the petition, the Debtor maintain..

Bankruptcy No. 88-2095-8B3 In Re Fulks (1988)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Nov. 10, 1988 Citations: 93 B.R. 274

93 B.R. 274 (1988) In re Donald FULKS, and Polly Fulks, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 88-2095-8B3. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. November 10, 1988. *275 Joel Treuhaft, Tampa, Fla., for debtor. Chris C. Larimore, Bradenton, Fla., Trustee. Lisa M. Castellano, Tampa, Fla., for FDIC. ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS THOMAS E. BAYNES, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge. THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Motion to Dismiss filed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The..

Bankruptcy No. 94-04154-6J1 In Re Puff'N Stuff of Winter Park, Inc. (1995)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: May 02, 1995 Citations: 183 B.R. 959

183 B.R. 959 (1995) In re PUFF 'N STUFF OF WINTER PARK, INC., jointly administered with Glenn F. Dietel and Christine B. Dietel, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 94-04154-6J1. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. May 2, 1995. *960 Kevin E. Mangum, Orlando, FL, for debtors. Margaret Hull, Orlando, FL, for U.S. Trustee. ORDER SUSTAINING OBJECTION TO EXEMPTION KAREN S. JENNEMANN, Bankruptcy Judge. This case [1] came on for hearing on the Objection to Exemptions (the "Objection") fi..

11-11021 Florida Ex Rel. Attorney General v. US Dept. of Health and Human Services (2011)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Aug. 12, 2011

648 F.3d 1235 (2011) State of FLORIDA, by and through ATTORNEY GENERAL, State of South Carolina, by and through Attorney General, State of Nebraska, by and through Attorney General, State of Texas, by and through Attorney General, State of Utah, by and through Attorney General, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of the Treasury, Sec..

00-004803PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF FUNERAL DIRECTORS AND EMBALMERS vs MARK L. TISHMAN (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 01, 2000

The issue is whether Respondent is guilty of fraudulent advertising or violation of other laws directly applicable to the funeral business.Revocation for funeral director who placed ad for unlicensed funeral home and who was found guilty of failing to cooperate with another agency; examination of pre-need contracts, fined $10,000, and failed to pay fine.

00-001794 MICHELLE C. PHILLIPS vs ORANGE LAKE COUNTRY CLUB REALTY, INC. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 27, 2000

Whether the Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction to conduct a formal hearing under the provisions of Sections 120.569 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, if the Petition for Relief was not timely filed pursuant to Section 760.11(7), Florida Statutes.Petitioner proved she was disabled and qualified for a job selling timeshare, but failed to prove she was fired due to discrimination against persons with hepatitis C.

96-001380 JOHN T. WHITE vs DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 1996

Whether Petitioner is eligible for firefighters' supplemental compensation.Firefighters major in communications was not readily identifiable with fire department duties. Not entitled to supplemental compensation.

93-006982 ALDEN PONDS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 10, 1993

Whether Petitioner is entitled to a wetland resource permit to construct an artificial waterway to be connected to the Indian River and, if so, the conditions that should be attached to the permit. Whether Respondent is estopped to deny the issuance of the wetland resource permit to Petitioner for the subject project. Whether Respondent should grant to Petitioner a variance to dredge and fill in Class II waters that have been conditionally approved for shellfish harvesting. Whether Petitioner is entitled to a default variance pursuant to Section 120.60(2), Florida Statutes, to dredge and fill in Class II waters that have been conditionally approved for shellfish harvesting.Dredge and fill project in Outstanding Florida Waters not clearly in public interest even when mitigation plan and recommended conditions are considered.

90-005803 GERALD M. SWINDLE vs SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 13, 1990

Whether Petitioner was wrongfully dismissed from his position as Field Service Technician II by the Southwest Florida Water Management District.Petitioner failed to prove prima facie case of discrimination.

92-002002 CHARLES P. PAGE vs SARASOTA COMPANY UTILITIES AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 27, 1992

Whether Respondent Sarasota County Public Utilities Department (Sarasota County) has provided reasonable assurances pursuant to Rule 17- 555.530(1)(a), Florida Administrative Code, that its proposed water treatment plant will comply with each applicable water quality standard contained in Part III, Chapter 17-550, Florida Administrative Code. Whether Respondent Sarasota County has provided reasonable assurance pursuant to Rule 17-555.530(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code, that its proposed water treatment plant meets adequate engineering design complying with the applicable engineering principles established in Rules 17-555.310 through 17-555.160, Florida Administrative Code.Where applicant makes preliminary showing of entitlement to permit protestor must establish facts to show applicants entitlement not based on prepondence evidence.

Joseph W. Jacquot