Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Joshua E Doyle
Joshua E Doyle
Visitors: 85
0
Bar #25902(FL)     License for 18 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Joshua E Doyle? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

  State Bd. of Funeral Directors Embalmers v. Cooksey  (1941)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 15, 1941
Appellee, pursuant to our disposition of this cause by our opinion and judgments filed here on the 30th day of May, 1941, and the 18th day of *Page 272 July, 1941, respectively, has now presented his Motion praying that he be allowed to file herein an extraordinary petition for rehearing. He contends that the statute involved, Chapter 17950, Acts of 1937, is unconstitutional and void because, as he alleges, it contravenes the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution and he avers that this..
  State Bd. of Funeral Directors Embalmers v. Cooksey  (1941)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 15, 1941
Appellee, pursuant to our disposition of this cause by our opinion and judgments filed here on the 30th day of May, 1941, and the 18th day of *Page 272 July, 1941, respectively, has now presented his Motion praying that he be allowed to file herein an extraordinary petition for rehearing. He contends that the statute involved, Chapter 17950, Acts of 1937, is unconstitutional and void because, as he alleges, it contravenes the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution and he avers that this..
  State Ex Rel. Urquhart v. Johnson  (1933)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jan. 09, 1933 Citations: 107 Fla. 624, 145 So. 880
This case is before us on motion to quash alternative writ of mandamus directed to the Respondents, commanding them: *Page 626 "As and constituting the Board of Bond Trustees of Ocean Shore Improvement District, a Special Taxing District in Flagler and Volusia Counties, Florida, and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, that you forthwith convene as such Board of Bond Trustees and make and submit to the Boards of County Commissioners of Flagler and Volusia Counties, Florida, instanter,..
  State Ex Rel. Urquhart v. Johnson  (1933)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jan. 09, 1933 Citations: 107 Fla. 624, 145 So. 880
This case is before us on motion to quash alternative writ of mandamus directed to the Respondents, commanding them: *Page 626 "As and constituting the Board of Bond Trustees of Ocean Shore Improvement District, a Special Taxing District in Flagler and Volusia Counties, Florida, and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, that you forthwith convene as such Board of Bond Trustees and make and submit to the Boards of County Commissioners of Flagler and Volusia Counties, Florida, instanter,..
  State Ex Rel. v. Lunsford  (1939)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 08, 1939 Citations: 141 Fla. 12, 192 So. 485
This is a case of original jurisdiction. The State of Florida, upon the relation of George Couper Gibbs, Attorney General of Florida, filed in this Court a petition for writ of quo warranto against N.B. Lunsford and W.R. Grice, who are, it is made to appear, usurping the duties of Constable of the Justice of the Peace District *Page 14 No. 1, in and for Bay County, State of Florida. The writ of quo warranto issued and was served on the respondents, N.B. Lunsford and W.R. Grice, and each filed ans..
  State Ex Rel. v. Lunsford  (1939)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 08, 1939 Citations: 141 Fla. 12, 192 So. 485
This is a case of original jurisdiction. The State of Florida, upon the relation of George Couper Gibbs, Attorney General of Florida, filed in this Court a petition for writ of quo warranto against N.B. Lunsford and W.R. Grice, who are, it is made to appear, usurping the duties of Constable of the Justice of the Peace District *Page 14 No. 1, in and for Bay County, State of Florida. The writ of quo warranto issued and was served on the respondents, N.B. Lunsford and W.R. Grice, and each filed ans..
  Electrical Equipment Co. v. Cook  (1933)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Dec. 19, 1933 Citations: 113 Fla. 312, 151 So. 483
Defendant in error brought an action at law against plaintiff in error to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from being struck on the head by a cash carrier when in the employ of plaintiff in error. This writ of error is to a judgment in the sum of $3,000.00. The record discloses that plaintiff in error operated a store in which it sold electrical equipment, radios, and automobile supplies. To expedite its business it had cash carriers running from various points in its store to a ce..
  City of Sarasota v. State  (1937)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Feb. 16, 1937 Citations: 127 Fla. 126, 172 So. 728
During the preceding term of this Court, the June Term, 1936, this Court affirmed the judgment of the Circuit Court for Sarasota County in a mandamus proceeding wherein a peremptory writ had been granted requiring the entire levy in one current year of a tax sufficient to pay the relator's past-due bonds, and mandate went down in due course. After the dismissal of an injunction which had been granted by the United States Court, the relator applied to the Circuit Court for Sarasota County for an o..
  City of Sarasota v. State  (1937)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Feb. 16, 1937 Citations: 127 Fla. 126, 172 So. 728
During the preceding term of this Court, the June Term, 1936, this Court affirmed the judgment of the Circuit Court for Sarasota County in a mandamus proceeding wherein a peremptory writ had been granted requiring the entire levy in one current year of a tax sufficient to pay the relator's past-due bonds, and mandate went down in due course. After the dismissal of an injunction which had been granted by the United States Court, the relator applied to the Circuit Court for Sarasota County for an o..
  Rocher Watkins Towing v. 3rd Natl. Bank  (1932)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Aug. 23, 1932 Citations: 106 Fla. 466, 143 So. 768
This cause is before us upon motion to quash a writ of certiorari heretofore issued out of this Court and directed to the Circuit Court of Dade County for the purpose of reviewing the judgment of *Page 467 that court in affirming a judgment of the Civil Court of Record in and for said County. The mover bases the motion upon the grounds that it affirmatively appears from the record that the writ was improvidently issued, that it appears from the application for the writ that the inferior court had..

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer