77 B.R. 913 (1987) In the Matter of John Herman MANCINI and Elizabeth Capone Mancini, Debtor. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF LARGO, Plaintiff, v. John Herman MANCINI, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 85-3830, Adv. No. 86-105. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. August 27, 1987. Charles M. Tatelbaum, Tampa, Fla., for plaintiff. Harley E. Riedel, Tampa, Fla., for defendant. ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Chief Judge. THIS C..

This case was referred for hearing by the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission (FLAWAC) based upon an appeal, filed by the Department of Community Affairs, of a development order (City of Jacksonville Resolution #89-821-339) adopted by the City, authorizing a development of regional impact identified as "Gran Park at Bayard". The DCA's Petition for review contained allegations related to the DRI's failure to adequately mitigate any unfavorable impact on the environment and natural resources (specifically the endangered species identified as Bartram's Ixia), the DRI's failure to adequately mitigate an undue burden on public transportation, and the failure to include certain documents with the development order when submitted to DCA for review. These three issues were resolved by the parties prior to hearing. Findings of Fact related to the settlement agreements are provided herein. The DCA's Petition further alleged that the proposed Gran Park at Bayard DRI is inconsistent with the State Comprehensive Plan and State Land Development Plan 1/ provisions primarily related to housing and urban sprawl, and that the DRI fails to mitigate an adverse impact on the ability of people to find adequate housing reasonable accessible to their places of employment. Accordingly, these issues are addressed in this Recommended Order. The ultimate issue is whether the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission should approve, deny, or approve with conditions or restrictions, the application for the Gran Park at Bayard DRI.Proposed Development of Regional Imapct is inconsistent with State comprehensive plan; is premature and inappropriate; and FLAWAC should deny ADA.

The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Respondents, Christina Saunders and Tim Saunders (hereinafter referred to as the "Saunders" or "Developers"), have complied with the applicable land use regulations for Franklin County, whether the Respondent, Franklin County ("County"), has properly enforced the applicable land use regulations with regard to the Saunders and their real property at issue and whether corrective action should be required of the Saunders.Subdivision not sufficiently developed to be exempt from ordinance; prior use as army post and] abandonment was devel of different character which lapsed

The ultimate issue is whether the Applicant, Florida-Georgia Venture Group, is entitled to development orders for its proposed development of regional impact, Hunter's Ridge, in Flagler County and the City of Ormond Beach, Florida.Development consistent with rule and statutory standards. Entitled to development order with conditions.