Miami-Dade FL Lawyers | Karen Milia Annunziato -- eLawyers

Karen Milia Annunziato

Visitors: 46

786-257-5072

Bar #101952(FL) License for 12 years

Miami FL

Are you Karen Milia Annunziato? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

CFR: 49 CFR 571

Florida Laws: 1006.22, 1006.25, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.60, 120.68, 316.003, 316.613, 316.614, 316.615, 39.01, 402.26, 402.281, 402.301, 402.302, 402.305, 402.3055, 402.308, 402.310, 402.311, 402.318, 402.319, 435.04, 489.103, 491.012, 517.07, 57.111, 72.011, 775.082, 775.083, 790.221, 90.803

16-006033 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES vs LINCOLN MARTI COMMUNITY AGENCY, INC., D/B/A LINCOLN MARTI (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 18, 2016

Whether Respondent's employee hit or forcefully grabbed children in care, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint; and, if so, whether Petitioner should impose a fine of $400.00 against Respondent, a licensed child care facility, for the commission, by an employee, of an act that meets the statutory definition of child abuse.Although Respondent's employee hit or forcefully grabbed children in care, the act did not meet the statutory definition of child abuse, and thus Petitioner should not impose a fine of $400.00 against Respondent, a licensed child care facility.

15-002426F CHILDREN'S HOUR DAY SCHOOL vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 21, 2015

The issues in this case, which arises from Petitioner's application for an award of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to section 57.111, Florida Statutes, are whether Petitioner was a prevailing small business party in a disciplinary proceeding that Respondent initiated, and, if so, whether Respondent's decision to prosecute Petitioner was substantially justified or whether special circumstances exist that would make an award unjust.As a prevailing small business party, Petitioner was awarded attorney's fees and costs because Respondent's decision to prosecute Petitioner for alleged disciplinable offenses was not substantially justified.

15-006474 CHILDREN'S ACADEMY PRESCHOOL INC., D/B/A CHILDREN'S ACADEMY PRESCHOOL I vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 17, 2015

Whether sufficient grounds exist to justify denial of Petitioner's license renewal application to operate a child care facility.For the first Class I health and safety violation and other violations, the Department was obligated under Rule 65C-22 to renew the Petitioner's day care license, but convert it to probationary status and impose monetary fines and other sanctions.

14-004539 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES vs CHILDREN'S HOUR DAY SCHOOL (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 29, 2014

Whether Respondent, a day-care center, committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, the penalties Petitioner should impose against Respondent.Department failed to prove factual predicates for alleged violations.

15-000896 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES vs WORTHLEY FAMILY DAY CARE HOME (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 17, 2015

The primary issue in this case is whether Respondent, a licensed family day care home, failed to have an operable pool alarm for its backyard swimming pool, as Petitioner alleges. If Respondent is found guilty of this disciplinable offense, then it will be necessary to determine the appropriate penalties for such violation.Respondent, a licensed family day care home, failed to have an operable pool alarm for its backyard swimming pool, a Class I Violation for which imposition of a $100 fine and termination of Respondent's Gold Seal designation were appropriate sanctions.

14-004586 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES vs PLAY AND LEARN CHILD CARE CENTER (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 02, 2014

The issues are: 1) whether Respondent seated a child in a non-excluded vehicle without an individual seat belt or federally approved child safety restraint, as allegedly required by section 402.305(10), Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rule 65C-22.001(6)(d) and (e); 2) if so, whether this is a Class I violation, as provided by section 402.305(10) and rule 65C-22.001(6)(d) and (e); and 3) if so, whether this Class I violation necessitates the termination of Respondent's Gold Seal designation, as provided by section 402.281.Petitioner failed to prove that school bus owned and operated by child care facility was not an excluded vehicle so as to be subject to seat-belt requirements.

14-000945 DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES vs MY FIRST SCHOOL, INC. (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 03, 2014

The issues in this case are: (1) whether Respondent misrepresented or fraudulently provided information to Petitioner regarding compliance of its child care facility with the annual physical examination and annual vehicle inspection requirements in Florida Administrative Code Rule 65C- 22.001(6)(a) and (c), in violation of section 402.319(1)(a), Florida Statutes, and Child Care Facility Standard No. 63, incorporated by reference into rule 65C-22.010(1)(d)1.; and (2) if Respondent committed the alleged violations, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that Respondent committed misrepresentation and fraudulently provided information related to its child care facility license.