welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Kelly Ann Bennett
Kelly Ann Bennett
Kelly Ann Bennett
Visitors: 154
0
Bar #112178(FL)     License for 28 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Kelly Ann Bennett? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

CFR: 21 CFR 1304.04

Florida Laws: 116.13, 120.52, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.68, 20.19, 20.21, 287.012, 287.017, 287.057, 30.29, 400.021, 408.806, 409.901, 409.907, 409.908, 409.910, 409.913, 409.919, 465.003, 465.015, 465.016, 465.019, 465.023, 465.025, 7.10, 713.19

Florida Administrative Code: 59G-6.010

99-003941  NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 20, 1999
The issues in this case are whether six outdoor advertising sign permits previously issued to Petitioner should be reinstated; or, if not, whether new permits should be issued for the six advertising facings (two on each of three sign structures) in Clearwater, Florida.Sign permits cancelled in March 1995 for lack of jurisdiction. Jurisdiction began in November 1995. Signs became illegal under local ordinance on January 19, 1996. Subsequent applications for new permits/reinstatement denied; illegal under ordinance.
99-003942  NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 20, 1999
The issues in this case are whether six outdoor advertising sign permits previously issued to Petitioner should be reinstated; or, if not, whether new permits should be issued for the six advertising facings (two on each of three sign structures) in Clearwater, Florida.Sign permits cancelled in March 1995 for lack of jurisdiction. Jurisdiction began in November 1995. Signs became illegal under local ordinance on January 19, 1996. Subsequent applications for new permits/reinstatement denied; illegal under ordnance.
99-005307  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 16, 1999
The three major issues for consideration in this hearing are whether the sign structure in issue has been moved or removed from the location for which it was permitted and improperly re- erected; whether the sign in issue is being operated and maintained without the required proper state permits; and whether the sign in issue is a conforming or nonconforming structure.Sign company`s failure to place its sign at the spot for which it was permitted made it illegal and required a permit to move; it must be removed.
99-005308  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 16, 1999
The three major issues for consideration in this hearing are whether the sign structure in issue has been moved or removed from the location for which it was permitted and improperly re- erected; whether the sign in issue is being operated and maintained without the required proper state permits; and whether the sign in issue is a conforming or nonconforming structure.Sign company`s failure to place its sign at the spot for which it was permitted made it illegal and required a permit to move; it must be removed.
99-005309  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 16, 1999
The three major issues for consideration in this hearing are whether the sign structure in issue has been moved or removed from the location for which it was permitted and improperly re- erected; whether the sign in issue is being operated and maintained without the required proper state permits; and whether the sign in issue is a conforming or nonconforming structure.Sign company`s failure to place its sign at the spot for which it was permitted made it illegal and required a permit to move; it must be removed.
99-005310  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 16, 1999
The three major issues for consideration in this hearing are whether the sign structure in issue has been moved or removed from the location for which it was permitted and improperly re- erected; whether the sign in issue is being operated and maintained without the required proper state permits; and whether the sign in issue is a conforming or nonconforming structure.Sign company`s failure to place its sign at the spot for which it was permitted made it illegal and required a permit to move; it must be removed.
00-001783BID  BURNS INTERNATIONAL GUARD SERVICES, INC., OF FLORIDA, D/B/A NYCO vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 27, 2000
Petitioner protests the method by which Respondent Department of Transportation (DOT) advertised RFP-DOT-99/00-3002 and RFP-DOT-99/00-3003 and the specifications contained in the RFP's SCOPE OF SERVICES, Sections 1.7.2, 2.0-A, 14.0-A, 14.0-B, and 14.0-C.Each Request for Proposals is de novo; potential bidders cannot rely on a prior course of dealing if advertisement meets rule requirements. Redundant background checks are contrary to competition, if not contrary to statutes.
99-003346  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 06, 1999
With respect to DOAH Case No. 99-3345T, whether the Respondent must remove the double-faced outdoor advertising sign located adjacent to I-95, on the west side of the highway, 1.25 miles south of North Lake Boulevard, in Palm Beach County, Florida, for the reasons set forth in the Notice of Violation - Illegally Erected Sign, dated March 31, 1999. With respect to DOAH Case No. 99-3346T, whether the Respondent's permits for a double-faced outdoor advertising sign located adjacent to I-95, on the west side of the highway, 1.25 miles south of North Lake Boulevard, in Palm Beach County, Florida, and bearing permit numbers AZ346-35 and AZ347-35, should be revoked for the reasons set forth in the Notice of Violation - Maintenance of Nonconforming Signs dated March 31, 1999.Department failed to prove that sign company removed and re-erected an outdoor advertising sign. Notices of Violation should be dismissed.
99-003345  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 06, 1999
With respect to DOAH Case No. 99-3345T, whether the Respondent must remove the double-faced outdoor advertising sign located adjacent to I-95, on the west side of the highway, 1.25 miles south of North Lake Boulevard, in Palm Beach County, Florida, for the reasons set forth in the Notice of Violation - Illegally Erected Sign, dated March 31, 1999. With respect to DOAH Case No. 99-3346T, whether the Respondent's permits for a double-faced outdoor advertising sign located adjacent to I-95, on the west side of the highway, 1.25 miles south of North Lake Boulevard, in Palm Beach County, Florida, and bearing permit numbers AZ346-35 and AZ347-35, should be revoked for the reasons set forth in the Notice of Violation - Maintenance of Nonconforming Signs dated March 31, 1999.Department failed to prove that sign company removed and re-erected an outdoor advertising sign. Notices of Violation should be dismissed.
99-004915  AK MEDIA GROUP, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 23, 1999
Whether the Petitioner's applications for two outdoor advertising permits, dated June 1, 1999, and received by the Respondent on June 10, 1999, should be granted or denied.The proposed site of an outdoor advertising sign was for commercial use under the future land use map, and the proposed site was zoned as "general commercial." Grant permit because the proposed site is "commercially zoned."

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer