Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Kimberly Clark Menchion
Kimberly Clark Menchion
Visitors: 86
0
Bar #425613(FL)     License for 25 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Kimberly Clark Menchion? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 33 U.S.c 40840 U.S.C 747942 U.S.C 201142 U.S.C 202142 U.S.C 213342 U.S.C 460142 U.S.C 4701

CFR: 10 CFR 2014 CFR 7718 CFR 4023 CFR 750.15123 CFR 750.70723 CFR 750.70723 CFR 750.70723 CFR 750.70733 CFR 20833 CFR 38533 CFR 385.2033 CFR 385.2033 CFR 385.2033 CFR 385.2633 CFR 385.2633 CFR 385.2640 CFR 122.2640 CFR 122.2640 CFR 122.2640 CFR 14140 CFR 144.3940 CFR 144.3940 CFR 144.3940 CFR 144.4040 CFR 144.4040 CFR 144.4040 CFR 144.4140 CFR 30 240 CFR 4040 CFR 50.240 CFR 50.240 CFR 50.240 CFR 5140 CFR 6040 CFR 60.1140 CFR 60.1240 CFR 60.1340 CFR 60.13040 CFR 60.1940 CFR 60.421140 CFR 60.421440 CFR 60.424540 CFR 60.432040 CFR 60.442040 CFR 60.4840 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.840 CFR 6340 CFR 63.659040 CFR 63.659040 CFR 63.659040 CFR 6840 CFR 7240 CFR 7549 CFR 2449 CFR 24.20749 CFR 24.20749 CFR 24.20749 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.404

Florida Laws: 10.1110.1511.45120.52120.536120.54120.56120.569120.57120.60120.68120.69122.26163.3164163.3180163.3194163.320917.00117.00220.331252.34253.02253.115253.75253.77258.397267.061290.002334.01334.03334.044335.182335.188337.11337.14337.16337.18337.401337.402337.403337.404339.05339.09339.2819361.01366.02366.03366.04366.041366.05366.051366.055366.80366.92366.93373.016373.019373.042373.0421373.044373.085373.086373.089373.103373.113373.129373.1391373.1501373.1502373.219373.223373.229373.246373.308373.309373.316373.319373.342373.403373.413373.4135373.4136373.414373.4145373.416373.421373.4211373.428373.429373.4592373.603376.301377.601379.1025379.2291379.2431380.04380.06380.23403.031403.061403.067403.087403.0872403.088403.0885403.111403.121403.131403.141403.151403.161403.501403.502403.503403.504403.506403.5064403.5065403.5066403.50665403.507403.508403.509403.510403.511403.5112403.5113403.5115403.512403.514403.515403.516403.5175403.518403.5185403.519403.522403.526403.527403.5271403.531403.5315403.5317403.722403.73403.814403.859403.861403.9404403.941403.9411403.9416403.9418403.9419421.55479.01479.015479.02479.04479.07479.08479.10479.105479.106479.107479.11479.111479.15479.155479.156479.1648.2048.21487.031487.041489.129489.142557.1116.057.017.0270.00170.20713.0179.01872.0290.202

Florida Administrative Code: 14-10.00414-10.004214-10.00614-10.00714-22.01214-22.014114-60.00914-66.00718-18.00418-18.00618-2.01818-21.00318-21.005125-6.034225-6.034528-106.20128-106.21740D-4.09140D-4.30140E-2.09140E-2.10140E-2.30140E-2.38140E-20.30240E-3.04140E-3.10140E-3.30140E-3.46140E-4.09140E-4.30240E-6.01140E-6.04140E-6.22140E-6.31140E-6.35162 -520.60062 -701.51062-110.10662-160.11062-160.30062-160.34062-17.13362-17.19162-17.20562-17.21162-17.28162-17.66062-204.80062-210.20062-210.30062-210.37062-210.65062-210.70062-212.30062-212.40062-296.32062-296.47062-297.10062-297.31062-297.52062-297.62062-341.62062-343.07062-343.09062-343.90062-345.10062-345.40062-345.50062-345.90062-4.02062-4.02162-4.03062-4.07062-4.08062-4.11062-4.12062-4.13062-4.16062-4.22062-4.24262-520.31062-520.40062-520.41062-520.42062-520.60062-520.90062-532.50062-555.31062-621.30062-672.87062-701.30062-701.51062-701.63062-701.90062-730.22562-730.30062-807.61068A-16.00168A-16.00268A-9.002

12-001855  CALUSA CAMPGROUND CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 21, 2012
Whether the subject sign, owned by Calusa Campground Condominium Association, Inc. (Calusa), is illegally erected because it is (1) located in the right-of-way of the Florida Department of Transportation (the Department) on U.S. Highway 1 in Monroe County, Florida, and/or (2) it does not have a required permit.Sign located on U.S. 1 in Monroe County should be removed because it is in DOT right-of-way and lacks a required permit.
12-001196  NORTH AMERICA MEDIA, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 04, 2012
The issue in this case, as set forth in a Notice of Violation initially issued by Respondent, Department of Transportation (the "Department"), on February 15, 2011, is whether Petitioner, North American Media, Inc. ("NAM"), illegally erected and maintained a roadside billboard for which a permit was required, but not obtained.1/Petitioner's sign is not visible from a regulated highway and needs no permit.
11-001681  CARTER OUTDOOR ADVERTISING vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 05, 2011
The issues in this case are: whether the Department of Transportation ("Department") properly issued a Notice of Intent to Revoke Sign Permit for Violation to Carter Outdoor Advertising a/k/a Carter Pritchett Advertising ("Carter") for the outdoor advertising sign permitted with tag numbers BV314/315 and whether the Department properly denied CBS Outdoor, Inc.'s ("CBS") application for outdoor advertising sign permit based on a spacing conflict with the outdoor advertising sign permitted with tag numbers BV314/315.DOT met its burden and demonstrated that Carter abandoned its nonconforming sign because it no longer exists at the permitted location after Carter voluntarily removed it in violation of rule 14-10.007(6)(b). Therefore, Carter's permit should be revoked.
11-001682  CBS OUTDOOR, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 05, 2011
The issues in this case are: whether the Department of Transportation ("Department") properly issued a Notice of Intent to Revoke Sign Permit for Violation to Carter Outdoor Advertising a/k/a Carter Pritchett Advertising ("Carter") for the outdoor advertising sign permitted with tag numbers BV314/315 and whether the Department properly denied CBS Outdoor, Inc.'s ("CBS") application for outdoor advertising sign permit based on a spacing conflict with the outdoor advertising sign permitted with tag numbers BV314/315.DOT met its burden and demonstrated that Carter abandoned its nonconforming sign because it no longer exists at the permitted location after Carter voluntarily removed it in violation of rule 14-10.007(6)(b). Therefore, Carter's permit should be revoked.
11-002777  JOHN AND PATRICIA KIRKWOOD vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 01, 2011
The issue in this case is whether the Department of Transportation (Respondent) should approve the request filed by John and Patricia Kirkwood (Petitioners) for an additional relocation mortgage interest differential payment.Respondent is not entitled to additional payment of mortgage interest differential.
09-003444  OUTLOOK MEDIA OF SOUTH FLORIDA, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 23, 2009
What final agency action should the Department of Transportation take on Petitioner's Application for Outdoor Advertising Permit.Recommend that application for sign permit be denied on grounds that the proposed sign failed to meet minimum spacing requirements and that local government permission was more than 6 months old.
08-003175  LAMAR OF TALLAHASSEE vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 02, 2008
At issue in this proceeding is whether the Department of Transportation's Notice of Denied Application for an outdoor advertising permit at State Road 61 (U.S. 319), 168 feet west of Thomasville Road, Leon County, issued to Lamar of Tallahassee on May 30, 2008, should be upheld pursuant to Section 479.07, Florida Statutes,1/ or whether the sign should be permitted as a nonconforming sign as defined by Section 479.01(14), Florida Statutes.Despite its status as a "nonconforming sign," Petitioner's sign did not meet the relevant criteria for a Department permit.
09-001560  CARTER-PRITCHETT ADVERTISING, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 24, 2009
The issue in the case is whether Carter-Pritchett Advertising, Inc.’s (Petitioner), applications for the outdoor advertising sign permits referenced herein and filed by the Petitioner should be approved.Zoning does not support approval of sign permit applications.
09-005187  WOODY DRAKE ADVERTISING, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 21, 2009
The issue is whether Respondent's Notices of Intent to Revoke Sign Permit should be upheld.Petitioner was entitled to re-erect its non-conforming outdoor sign since it was not "destroyed" as defined by Florida Administrative Code Rule 14-10.007(6)(a).
08-004039  ANDRES MONSALVE vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 19, 2008
The issue for determination is whether Petitioner’s applications for a State sign permit should be granted.Petitioner failed to demonstrate that his applications for outdoor advertising sign permits met the requirements for approval. Recommend denial of the applications.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer