Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Kimberly Clark Menchion
Kimberly Clark Menchion
Visitors: 76
0
Bar #425613(FL)     License for 25 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Kimberly Clark Menchion? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 33 U.S.c 40840 U.S.C 747942 U.S.C 201142 U.S.C 202142 U.S.C 213342 U.S.C 460142 U.S.C 4701

CFR: 10 CFR 2014 CFR 7718 CFR 4023 CFR 750.15123 CFR 750.70723 CFR 750.70723 CFR 750.70723 CFR 750.70733 CFR 20833 CFR 38533 CFR 385.2033 CFR 385.2033 CFR 385.2033 CFR 385.2633 CFR 385.2633 CFR 385.2640 CFR 122.2640 CFR 122.2640 CFR 122.2640 CFR 14140 CFR 144.3940 CFR 144.3940 CFR 144.3940 CFR 144.4040 CFR 144.4040 CFR 144.4040 CFR 144.4140 CFR 30 240 CFR 4040 CFR 50.240 CFR 50.240 CFR 50.240 CFR 5140 CFR 6040 CFR 60.1140 CFR 60.1240 CFR 60.1340 CFR 60.13040 CFR 60.1940 CFR 60.421140 CFR 60.421440 CFR 60.424540 CFR 60.432040 CFR 60.442040 CFR 60.4840 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.740 CFR 60.840 CFR 6340 CFR 63.659040 CFR 63.659040 CFR 63.659040 CFR 6840 CFR 7240 CFR 7549 CFR 2449 CFR 24.20749 CFR 24.20749 CFR 24.20749 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.30149 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.40249 CFR 24.404

Florida Laws: 10.1110.1511.45120.52120.536120.54120.56120.569120.57120.60120.68120.69122.26163.3164163.3180163.3194163.320917.00117.00220.331252.34253.02253.115253.75253.77258.397267.061290.002334.01334.03334.044335.182335.188337.11337.14337.16337.18337.401337.402337.403337.404339.05339.09339.2819361.01366.02366.03366.04366.041366.05366.051366.055366.80366.92366.93373.016373.019373.042373.0421373.044373.085373.086373.089373.103373.113373.129373.1391373.1501373.1502373.219373.223373.229373.246373.308373.309373.316373.319373.342373.403373.413373.4135373.4136373.414373.4145373.416373.421373.4211373.428373.429373.4592373.603376.301377.601379.1025379.2291379.2431380.04380.06380.23403.031403.061403.067403.087403.0872403.088403.0885403.111403.121403.131403.141403.151403.161403.501403.502403.503403.504403.506403.5064403.5065403.5066403.50665403.507403.508403.509403.510403.511403.5112403.5113403.5115403.512403.514403.515403.516403.5175403.518403.5185403.519403.522403.526403.527403.5271403.531403.5315403.5317403.722403.73403.814403.859403.861403.9404403.941403.9411403.9416403.9418403.9419421.55479.01479.015479.02479.04479.07479.08479.10479.105479.106479.107479.11479.111479.15479.155479.156479.1648.2048.21487.031487.041489.129489.142557.1116.057.017.0270.00170.20713.0179.01872.0290.202

Florida Administrative Code: 14-10.00414-10.004214-10.00614-10.00714-22.01214-22.014114-60.00914-66.00718-18.00418-18.00618-2.01818-21.00318-21.005125-6.034225-6.034528-106.20128-106.21740D-4.09140D-4.30140E-2.09140E-2.10140E-2.30140E-2.38140E-20.30240E-3.04140E-3.10140E-3.30140E-3.46140E-4.09140E-4.30240E-6.01140E-6.04140E-6.22140E-6.31140E-6.35162 -520.60062 -701.51062-110.10662-160.11062-160.30062-160.34062-17.13362-17.19162-17.20562-17.21162-17.28162-17.66062-204.80062-210.20062-210.30062-210.37062-210.65062-210.70062-212.30062-212.40062-296.32062-296.47062-297.10062-297.31062-297.52062-297.62062-341.62062-343.07062-343.09062-343.90062-345.10062-345.40062-345.50062-345.90062-4.02062-4.02162-4.03062-4.07062-4.08062-4.11062-4.12062-4.13062-4.16062-4.22062-4.24262-520.31062-520.40062-520.41062-520.42062-520.60062-520.90062-532.50062-555.31062-621.30062-672.87062-701.30062-701.51062-701.63062-701.90062-730.22562-730.30062-807.61068A-16.00168A-16.00268A-9.002

19-000499RU  ALL SEASONS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 28, 2019
The issue in this case is whether a liquidated damages term in the Department’s specification for Invitation to Bid (“ITB”) constitutes an unadopted rule, as defined in section 120.52(20), Florida Statutes, in violation of section 120.54(1)(a).Petitioner failed to prove that the alleged agency statement was an unadopted rule.
16-002567  M AND B LAWN MAINTENANCE SERVICE, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 06, 2016
Whether Petitioner's conduct, omissions or actions in failing to execute and provide required documentation regarding roadway maintenance contracts awarded by Respondent, warrants a finding that Petitioner is "non-responsible" for a two-year period and prohibited from contracting with the state for that period of time.Petitioner's conduct in not signing or providing documents concerning mowing contracts awarded by DOT, did not justify finding Petitioner non-responsible, particularly in light of DOT's discontinuation of payments on another contract with Petitioner.
13-001623RX  CARTER SIGN RENTALS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 01, 2013
Whether Florida Administrative Code Rule 14-10.007(6)(b), which provides for revocation of outdoor advertising permits for nonconforming signs that are abandoned or discontinued, is an "invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority" as alleged by Petitioners.Petitioner failed to prove that F.A.C.R. 14-10.007(6)(b) is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
13-003518RX  NISSI, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 13, 2013
Whether Florida Administrative Code Rule 14-10.007(6)(b), which provides for revocation of outdoor advertising permits for nonconforming signs that are abandoned or discontinued, is an "invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority" as alleged by Petitioners.Petitioner failed to prove that F.A.C.R. 14-10.007(6)(b) is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
15-001101  STRAIGHT AND NARROW STRIPING, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 02, 2015
The issue is whether the Department of Transportation (Department) properly issued a Notice of Intent to Declare Non-Responsible (Notice) to Straight and Narrow Striping, Inc. (S&NS).Petitioner's failure to complete the work order, after repeated extensions of time given by the Department, leads to the conclusion it is a non-responsible contractor. Petitioner should be suspended for a period not to exceed one year.
15-000733  KATHRYN HOGAN PEREDA AND MARGARET HOGAN MARKER, D/B/A HFT ADVERTISING vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 13, 2015
The issue in this case is whether the Department of Transportation (“Department”) properly issued a Notice of Denied Outdoor Advertising Permit Application for the eastward face of the Monument Sign owned by Kathryn Hogan Pereda and Margaret Hogan Marker, d/b/a/ HFT Advertising (“Petitioner” or “HFT”).The Department properly denied Petitioner's permit application because the sign failed to meet the spacing requirements of section 479.07 and no exemptions apply.
13-004043  SALVATORE ROMANELLI vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 16, 2013
Whether Petitioner, the owner of an outdoor advertising sign structure with two faces, is entitled to a Vegetation Management Permit for the respective view zones set forth in his application.Application for Vegetation Maintenance Permit should be denied because requested view zones are inconsistent with applicable statute and rule.
13-001659  R AND J ENTERPRISES OF BREVARD, LLP vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 07, 2013
The central issues in this case are whether Petitioner knowingly submitted an application with false or misleading information for the purpose of securing sign permits and, if so, whether the sign permits should be revoked.Submission of a false parcel number and erroneous zoning constituted adequate grounds for revoking sign permits.
13-001283  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs GREEN'S GARAGE AND WRECKER SERVICE, INC.  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2013
The issue in this case is whether Respondent?s Outdoor Advertising Permits should be revoked pursuant to section 479.08, Florida Statutes, because the associated sign has not remained substantially the same, has been disassembled and re-erected, or has been destroyed, as set forth in the Amended Notice of Intent to Revoke.Respondent's nonconforming sign was not destroyed and re-erected under section 479.08, Florida Statutes, and the Outdoor Advertising Permit should remain in effect.
12-003537  STEFAN AND DANA GHEORGHE vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 31, 2012
The issue is whether the Department of Transportation's calculation of Petitioner's replacement housing payment determination was correct.Petitioners failed to establish entitlement to additional replacement housing funding.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer