Seminole FL Administrative law, Health care and Licensing La -- eLawyers

18-006496FL LOVING TOUCH "A BRIGHTER FUTURE" HOME, OWNED AND OPERATED BY ZULIA BRENOVIL, LOVING TOUCH ADULT FAMILY CARE, INC. vs AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 10, 2018

Whether Petitioners' applications to license their group home facilities should have been approved by Respondent, Agency for Persons with Disabilities ("APD" or "Respondent").Utilizing the provisions of chapter 393.0673, Florida Statutes, the preponderance of the evidence showed that the agency properly denied Petitioners' initial applications for licensure.

18-006497FL LOVING TOUCH "DYNAMIC" HOME, OWNED AND OPERATED BY ZULIA BRENOVIL, LOVING TOUCH ADULT FAMILY CARE, INC. vs AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 10, 2018

Whether Petitioners' applications to license their group home facilities should have been approved by Respondent, Agency for Persons with Disabilities ("APD" or "Respondent").Petitioners' license application should be denied by the agency.

16-005641MPI AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs RONALD M. MARINI, D.M.D., P.A. (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 27, 2016

Whether Ronald M. Marini, D.M.D., P.A. (Respondent), received Medicaid overpayments that the Agency for Health Care Administration is entitled to recover; and whether sanctions and costs should be imposed against Respondent.Respondent received Medicaid overpayments that Petitioner is entitled to recover. Petitioner is also entitled to recover its costs and impose sanctions against Respondent.

18-004513PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY vs MICHAEL T. CORONEOS, L.M.T. (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 28, 2018

The issues presented in this case are whether Respondent has violated the provisions of chapters 456 and 480, Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaint; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner presented clear and convincing evidence that Respondent engaged in sexual misconduct in the practice of massage therapy. Recommend $2,500.00 fine and revocation.

13-000502PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY vs JINCHUN CUI, L.M.T. (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 11, 2013

The issue to be determined is whether Respondent violated sections 456.072(1)(h), 456.072(1)(w), and 480.041(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), as alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove Respondent obtained her license by fraud. Recommend dismissal of Amended Administrative Complaint.

12-003666PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY vs SHIYING PENG, L.M.T. (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 14, 2012

The issues in this case are whether Respondent, a massage therapist, obtained a license: (a) by means of fraudulent misrepresentations; (b) which she knew had been issued in error; and/or (c) without having completed a course of study at an approved school, as Petitioner alleges. If so, it will be necessary to determine an appropriate penalty.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent, using fraudulent misrepresentations, obtained a message therapy license due to an agency error, without having completed a course of study at an approved school.

21-000180PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY vs TERRENCE GRYWINSKI, L.M.T. (2021)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 15, 2021

The issues to be resolved are whether Respondent committed the offenses charged in the Administrative Complaints and, if so, what penalties should be imposed.Petitioner did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent committed sexual misconduct. Recommends dismissal of Administrative Complaint.

21-000181 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY vs TERRENCE GRYWINSKI MASSAGE (2021)