Leon FL Administrative law, Aviation and Environmental Law L -- eLawyers

96-1148 Beazer v. Agrico (1998)

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: Aug. 24, 1998

Filed: August 24, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1148 (CA-89-2851-2-8) Beazer Materials and Services, etc., et al, Defendant & Third Party Plaintiff - Appellants, versus Acrico Chemical Co., et al, Defendant & Third Party Plaintiff - Appellees. O R D E R The court amends its opinion filed January 21, 1998, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 1 - the status is changed from “UNPUBLISHED” to “PUBLISHED.” On page 2, section 4, line 1 - the status line is changed..

NN-364-T1-83 Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Trevethan (1980)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 27, 1980 Citations: 390 So. 2d 724

390 So. 2d 724 (1980) COTTON STATES MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Jeanne H. TREVETHAN, Appellee. No. NN-364/T1-83. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. June 27, 1980. Rehearing Denied August 28, 1980. Monroe E. McDonald of Sanders, McEwan, Mims & McDonald, Orlando, for appellant. Anthony I. Provitola, DeLand, for appellee. ORFINGER, Judge. We review an "excess judgment" entered against appellant following a jury trial. Jeanne Trevethan was seriously injured when a motorc..

96-1148 Beazer Materials v. Agrico Chemical Co (1998)

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: Jan. 21, 1998

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT H. GEORGE DENT, JR.; ASHLEY REALTY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, a South Carolina Corporation; SOUTHERN DREDGING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, a South Carolina Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. BEAZER MATERIALS AND SERVICES, INCORPORATED; BEAZER EAST, INCORPORATED, Defendant & Third Party Plaintiff-Appellants, v. AGRICO CHEMICAL COMPANY; No. 96-1148 CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY; AMERICAN AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL COMPANY; FOS-KEM LIQUIDATION CORPORATION, Defen..

18-002124EPP IN RE: TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY BIG BEND UNIT 1 MODERNIZATION PROJECT POWER PLANT SITING APPLICATION NO. PA79-12A2 vs * (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 25, 2018

Whether Tampa Electric Company's (Tampa Electric) application for site certification of existing Big Bend Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and authorization to construct and operate the Big Bend Unit 1 Modernization Project should be approved under section 403.5175, Florida Statutes.Sierra Club did not prove its case in opposition, therefore, the Siting Board should approve certification of Tampa Electric Company, Big Bend Power Generating Station's existing Units 1, 2, and 3, and the Modernization Project.

2D08-1807 Butler v. State (2008)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 24, 2008 Citations: 996 So. 2d 860

996 So. 2d 860 (2008) BUTLER v. STATE. No. 2D08-1807. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. December 24, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

83-2692 Koenig v. State (1986)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 02, 1986 Citations: 497 So. 2d 875

497 So. 2d 875 (1986) Robert KOENIG, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 83-2692. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. January 28, 1986. On Rehearing December 2, 1986. *876 Gelber, Glass & Durant and N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Miami, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Anthony C. Musto, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ. DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge. Although we agree with the defendant that, absent a dete..

3354 Price v. Florida Power and Light Co. (1963)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 13, 1963 Citations: 159 So. 2d 654

159 So. 2d 654 (1963) Gerald W. PRICE, Appellant, v. FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CO., a Florida corporation, Appellee. No. 3354. District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District. December 13, 1963. Rehearing Denied January 29, 1964. *655 Michael K. Davis, of Watson, Hubert & Sousley, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. Norman C. Roettger, Jr., of Fleming, O'Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee. SMITH, Chief Judge. This is an appeal from a final judgment in favor of the defendant, Florida Po..

12-003369EPP IN RE: TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY, POLK POWER STATION, POLK 2-5 COMBINED CYCLE CONVERSION PROJECT vs * (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 11, 2012

The issue to be determined in this proceeding is whether the Governor and Cabinet, sitting as the Siting Board, should certify the Polk 2-5 Combined Cycle Conversion Project (“Project”) of Tampa Electric Company ("TEC"), including its associated electrical transmission lines, subject to the proposed Conditions of Certification.It is recommended that the Siting Board certify the Project because it favorably satisfies all of the statutory factors that are to be considered under section 403.509(3), Florida Statutes.

08-002727EPP IN RE: PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA LEVY NUCLEAR PROJECT UNITS 1 AND 2 vs * (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 09, 2008

Nuclear power plant and associated facilities and transmission lines met certification requirements.

07-005691TL IN RE: TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY AND PROGRESS ENERGY COMPANY`S LAKE AGNES-GIFFORD TRANSMISSION LINE SITING APPLICATION NO. TA07-16 vs * (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 17, 2007

The issue for determination is whether either of the proposed transmission line corridors for the proposed Lake Agnes-Gifford 230 kV transmission line comply with the criteria in Section 403.529(4), Florida Statutes, and if so, which of those corridors has the least adverse impacts with respect to the criteria in Section 403.529(4), Florida Statutes, including cost. If one of the corridors proper for certification is determined to have the least adverse impacts, the issue is whether certification of that corridor should be approved in whole, with modifications or conditions, or denied. See § 403.529(4) and (5), Fla. Stat. If the two corridors are found to be substantially equal in adverse impacts regarding the criteria in Section 403.529(4), Florida Statutes, including costs, the Siting Board shall certify the Joint Applicants' Preferred Corridor. See § 403.529(5)(c), Fla. Stat.Applicants` proposed corridor for new transmission line in Orange, Polk and Osceola counties was certified as proposed and determined to be superior to the alternate corridor proposed by intervenor.

Lawrence N Curtin