welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Marc Ito
Marc Ito
Marc Ito
Visitors: 70
0
Bar #61463(FL)     License for 16 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Marc Ito? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

CFR: 42 CFR 418.20, 42 CFR 418.22, 42 CFR 418.22, 42 CFR 418.22, 42 CFR 418.24, 42 CFR 418.24, 42 CFR 418.24, 42 CFR 418.3, 42 CFR 418.64, 42 CFR 418.70, 42 CFR 483.15

Florida Laws: 120.52, 120.54, 120.542, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.60, 120.68, 120.80, 120.81, 2.01, 20.43, 287.057, 381.001, 381.0011, 381.986, 393.0661, 395.1031, 395.3025, 395.40, 395.4001, 395.401, 395.4015, 395.402, 395.4025, 395.403, 395.404, 395.4045, 395.405, 400.23, 400.6005, 400.601, 400.609, 400.6095, 408.031, 408.032, 408.034, 408.035, 408.036, 408.037, 408.039, 408.043, 408.0455, 408.07, 408.809, 408.813, 408.814, 408.821, 409.901, 409.902, 409.905, 409.908, 409.920, 409.975, 418.20, 418.22, 418.24, 420.504, 420.507, 420.5099, 429.19, 429.41, 550.002, 550.01215, 550.2415, 57.105, 57.111, 601.03, 601.40

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.217, 59C-1.012, 59C-1.039, 64J -2.010, 64J -2.012, 64J-2.010, 64J-2.012, 64J-2.016

17-005301CON  UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI, D/B/A UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI HOSPITAL AND CLINICS vs BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF MIAMI, INC., AND AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 22, 2017
Whether the Certificate of Need (“CON”) Application No. 10490 submitted by Baptist Hospital of Miami, Inc. (“Baptist Hospital” or “Baptist”), to establish a new adult autologous and allogeneic bone marrow transplant program in Florida’s Organ Transplant Service Area 4 (“TSA 4”) should be approved.Respondents demonstrated that not normal circumstances justified granting the application for a bone marrow transplant program.
17-003265  SHANDS JACKSONVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., D/B/A UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 06, 2017
Whether the application timely filed with the Department of Health (“Department”) by Memorial Healthcare Group, Inc., d/b/a Memorial Hospital Jacksonville (“Memorial”), met the applicable standards for approval to operate as a provisional Level II trauma center; and whether the Department’s approval of the application was based upon an unadopted rule.Memorial met its burden--establishing that its trauma center application met applicable standards; Shands' argument that the Dep't acted pursuant to an unadopted rule is contrary to §395.4025, Fla Stat. Memorial is entitled to provisional Level II status.
16-003369  SHANDS JACKSONVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., D/B/A UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 15, 2016
Whether the application filed on April 1, 2016, by Orange Park Medical Center, Inc., d/b/a Orange Park Medical Center (Orange Park), to operate as a Level II trauma center met the applicable statutory and rule criteria to receive provisional approval? Whether the Department of Health’s (Department) approval of the application was based upon an unadopted rule?There is no available "slot" for a new trauma center in TSA 5, and, therefore, Orange Park's application for provisional approval must be denied. The Department improperly relied upon an unadopted rule in accepting Orange Park's application.
15-005549CON  NORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, D/B/A BROWARD HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER vs SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, D/B/A MEMORIAL REGIONAL HOSPITAL, AND AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 02, 2015
Whether Certificate of Need (CON) applications 10386 and 10388 filed by South Broward Hospital District, d/b/a Memorial Regional Hospital (Memorial), to establish a pediatric kidney transplantation program at Joe DiMaggio Children’s Hospital and an adult kidney transplantation program at Memorial Regional Hospital in Broward County, both of which are proposed for organ transplantation service area (OTSA) 4, should be approved. Alternatively, do competing CON applications 10387 and 10389 filed by North Broward Hospital District, d/b/a Broward Health Medical Center (Broward Health), to establish a pediatric kidney transplantation program at Chris Evert Children’s Hospital and Broward Health Medical Center, on balance, better satisfy the applicable statutory and rule review criteria for award of a CON to establish a pediatric or adult kidney transplantation program in OTSA 4?As between two competing applicants to establish adult and pediatric kidney transplant programs in OTSA 4, Memorial's proposals are superior to those submitted by Broward Health, and should therefore be approved.
15-005550CON  NORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, D/B/A BROWARD HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER vs SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, D/B/A MEMORIAL REGIONAL HOSPITAL AND AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 02, 2015
Whether Certificate of Need (CON) applications 10386 and 10388 filed by South Broward Hospital District, d/b/a Memorial Regional Hospital (Memorial), to establish a pediatric kidney transplantation program at Joe DiMaggio Children’s Hospital and an adult kidney transplantation program at Memorial Regional Hospital in Broward County, both of which are proposed for organ transplantation service area (OTSA) 4, should be approved. Alternatively, do competing CON applications 10387 and 10389 filed by North Broward Hospital District, d/b/a Broward Health Medical Center (Broward Health), to establish a pediatric kidney transplantation program at Chris Evert Children’s Hospital and Broward Health Medical Center, on balance, better satisfy the applicable statutory and rule review criteria for award of a CON to establish a pediatric or adult kidney transplantation program in OTSA 4?As between two competing applicants to establish adult and pediatric kidney transplant programs in OTSA 4, Memorial's proposals are superior to those submitted by Broward Health, and should therefore be approved.
20-001733CON  SUNCOAST HOSPICE OF HILLSBOROUGH, LLC vs CORNERSTONE HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE, INC., AND VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF FLORIDA  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 03, 2020
Whether the certificate of need (“CON”) applications filed by Cornerstone Hospice & Palliative Care, Inc. (“Cornerstone”); Suncoast Hospice of Hillsborough, LLC (“Suncoast”); and VITAS Healthcare Corporation of Florida (“VITAS”), for a new hospice program in Agency for Health Care Administration (“AHCA” or the “Agency”) Service Area 6A (Hillsborough County), satisfy the applicable statutory and rule review criteria sufficiently to warrant approval, and, if so, which of the three applications, on balance, best meets the applicable criteria for approval.With a published need for one new program, as between three competing applicants, Suncoast's proposed hospice best satisfies statutory and rule criteria, and should therefore be approved for Hillsborough County.
21-000725BID  HTG ASTORIA, LTD vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 23, 2021
Whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (“Florida Housing”) preliminary award of funding to University Station I, LLC (“University Station”), was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious, or contrary to Florida Housing’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or RFA specifications.Petitioner failed to carry its burden of demonstrating that Florida Housing's proposed award to University Station was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.
21-000726BID  MHP FL VIII, LLLP vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 23, 2021
Whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (“Florida Housing”) preliminary award of funding to University Station I, LLC (“University Station”), was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious, or contrary to Florida Housing’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or RFA specifications.Petitioner failed to carry its burden of demonstrating that Florida Housing's proposed award to University Station was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.
21-000727BID  VISTA AT COCONUT PALM, LTD vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 23, 2021
Whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (“Florida Housing”) preliminary award of funding to University Station I, LLC (“University Station”), was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious, or contrary to Florida Housing’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or RFA specifications.Petitioner failed to carry its burden of demonstrating that Florida Housing's proposed award to University Station was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer