Hendry FL Lawyers | Mark F Lapp -- eLawyers

AB-90 Florida State Bank of Tallahassee v. Honey (1982)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 1982 Citations: 407 So. 2d 1082

407 So. 2d 1082 (1982) FLORIDA STATE BANK OF TALLAHASSEE, Appellant, v. Curtis HONEY and Hearl Brogan, Appellees. No. AB-90. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. January 5, 1982. L. Lee Williams, Jr., of Peeples, Earl, Moore & Blank, Tallahassee, for appellant. R. Lee Dorough, Tallahassee, for appellee Honey and Neil H. Butler of Pennington, Wilkinson, Gary & Dunlap, Tallahassee, for appellee Brogan. McCORD, Judge. Appellant, Florida State Bank (Bank), appeals the trial court's de..

14-001441GM THE SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA vs HENDRY COUNTY, FLORIDA, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 27, 2014

Whether the amendments to the Hendry County Comprehensive Plan adopted on February 25, 2014, by County Ordinance No. 2014- 03, are “in compliance,” as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2013).1/Petitioner proved beyond fair debate that the Plan Amendment was not "in compliance," as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.

98-002927 COUNTY LINE COALITION, INC. vs PASCO COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 02, 1998

The issue in this case is whether the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) should grant Individual Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) Application No. 4316067.00 for approval of a proposed surface water management system (SWMS) for a planned road improvement project.Surface water management system permit application was opposed after Water Management District`s intent to grant. Applicant proved all permitting criteria were met. Unreasonable to require existing fill to be replaced by a bridge.

02-003790BID PAUL J. SIERRA CONSTRUCTION, INC. vs SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 27, 2002

The issue is whether Respondent's decision to reject all proposals on RFP No. 008-02 to design and build an ancillary building at the Tampa Service Office was arbitrary, as alleged by Petitioner.Challenger failed to show that agency`s action in rejecting all proposals to achieve cost savings on project was arbitrary.

02-000282 ALAN BEHRENS AND DESOTO CITIZENS AGAINST POLLUTION, INC. vs MICHAEL J. BORAN AND SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 17, 2002

The issue in this case is whether Water Use Permit (WUP) Application Number 20009478.005 meets the conditions for issuance as established in Section 373.223, Florida Statutes (2001), Florida Administrative Code Rule 40D-2.301 (April 2001), and the District’s Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications.Application to modify Water Use Permit to add well and increase use, but decrease overall per acre use, to irrigate sod farm. Evidence proved all conditions for issuance. Request for prevailing party attorneys fees denied.

99-001415 CRYSTAL SPRINGS RECREATIONAL PRESERVE, INC. vs SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 1999

The issues presented for decision in this case are whether Petitioner, Crystal Springs Recreational Preserve (the "Preserve") has provided reasonable assurances, on an individual and cumulative basis, that it has satisfied the conditions for permit issuance set forth in Rule 40D-2.301(1), Florida Administrative Code, with respect to Water Use Permit ("WUP") Modification Application No. 209132.03 (the "Application").Petitioner failed to provide reasonable assurances that its request for modification of its existing water use permit satisfied all conditions for permit issues set forth in Rule 40D-2.301(1), Florida Administrative Code.

01-002571 FRANK C. KUNNEN, JR. vs SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 29, 2001

The issue is whether Respondent, Southwest Florida Water Management District (the "District"), should approve the application of Respondent, Florida Department of Transportation ("DOT"), for modification of a standard general environmental resource permit: modification permit no. 44011760.010 (the "modification permit").Department made prima facie showing it is entitled to modification permit.

99-004158 CARLOS M. BERUFF vs SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 04, 1999

The issue is whether Petitioner is entitled to an environmental resource permit for a surface water management system and the alteration of a wetland in connection with the construction of two warehouses, paved parking and loading areas, a detention pond, and enhancement of the remainder of the existing wetland. If not otherwise entitled to the permit, an additional issue is whether Petitioner is entitled to the permit through an exemption, waiver, or variance from the standard requirements for mitigation.No environmental resource permit because proposed activity would increase post-development runoff rate by 50 percent, decrease historic basin storage by more than 40, and destroy wetlands with an enhancement mitigation ratio of six to one.

99-004159 CARLOS M. BERUFF vs SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 04, 1999

The issue is whether Petitioner is entitled to an environmental resource permit for a surface water management system and the alteration of a wetland in connection with the construction of two warehouses, paved parking and loading areas, a detention pond, and enhancement of the remainder of the existing wetland. If not otherwise entitled to the permit, an additional issue is whether Petitioner is entitled to the permit through an exemption, waiver, or variance from the standard requirements for mitigation.No environmental resource permit because proposed activity would increase post-development runoff rate by 50 percent, decrease historic basin storage by more than 40, and destroy wetlands with an enhancement mitigation ratio of six to one.

98-004925 ALAFIA RIVER BASIN STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL, INC. vs TAMPA BAY WATER AND SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 04, 1998

The issue presented for decision in this case is whether Respondent, the Southwest Florida Water Management District (the "District"), should issue Water Use Permit ("WUP") No. 2011794.00 to the Respondent, Tampa Bay Water, pursuant to the Notice of Proposed Agency Action and Draft Water Use Permit issued on September 30, 1998.Applicant, Tampa Bay Water, provided reasonable assurances that its proposed Alafia River withdrawal project meets conditions set forth in Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, and Rule 40D-2.301, Florida Administrative Code.

Mark F Lapp