The issue is whether Respondent committed the acts alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint, and if so, what discipline should be imposed.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent improperly "coached" students on the 2003 FCAT. The students` accounts were not credible. Recommended that the complaint be dismissed.
The issue in this case is whether Respondent violated Sections 231.28(1)(a), (c), (d), and (i), Florida Statutes (1997), and Florida Administrative Code Rule 6B-1.006(5)(a) and (h) by having his teaching certificate permanently revoked in New Jersey for dealing in stolen property and failing to disclose the revocation on the application for renewal of his Florida teaching certificate. (All chapter and section references are to Florida Statutes (1997) unless otherwise stated. Unless otherwise stated, all references to rules are to rules promulgated in the Florida Administrative Code in effect on the date of this Recommended Order.)Teacher who applied for renewal of his Florida teaching certificate and failed to disclose prior revocation of New Jersey certificate for dealing in stolen vehicles should have his Florida certificate permanently revoked.
The issue is whether Petitioner is entitled to a permanent teaching certificate.Petitioner entitled to permanent teaching certificate because she has shown good moral character and is not guilty of acts or omissions for which certificate could be revoked. Also entitled to license by default.
